You heard about Russian dissident Alexei Navalny being poisoned with the nerve agent Novichok and almost dying from it. And it was absorbed through the skin, the intact skin. This is what it does: 

It overstimulates the nervous system, interfering with muscle function, causing spasms.

 Does that sound familiar? I can show you a picture of it. JFK was not in control of his muscles. He was in spasm, the effect of a nerve agent. And it didn't absorb through his intact skin, rather his violated skin. A frozen missile tore into his skin, and the chemical agent got immediately into his bloodstream. I doubt it was Novichok. Shellfish toxin is what CIA Director William Colby referred to at the Church Hearings. But, that is also a nerve agent. We are seeing the effect of that poisoning here. That's what the back shot was all about. It was not a bullet. It was a frozen dart embedded with a powerful toxin, a nerve agent. 

 I've delved into many aspects of the JFK assassination, but this issue of what hit JFK in the back has risen to the top for me. And that's because it goes to the core of the BIG LIE. And what is at the core of the BIG LIE? It's the Single Bullet Theory; the ridiculous and preposterous Single Bullet Theory. 

If JFK had been shot in the back of the neck with a bullet that traversed his neck, he would not have gone on sitting there. And no, the back brace wasn't holding him up. He surely would have been instantly paralyzed on one side, because even if the bullet miraculously avoided the spinal cord, there are nerves coming out on each side of spinal cord, and considering the supposed path of the bullet, it surely would have bored through those nerves. 

And remember that inflammation sets in immediately, and the only way they were able to save Christopher Reeves was to give him massive doses of steroids. It's just ridiculous to think that JFK sustained such a trauma prior to the fatal headshot. 

And of course, people objected to it right away. They made fun of it by calling it the Magic Bullet theory. But, what did they propose happened instead? That's where they dropped the ball. 

Think about it intuitively. A man is riding in a convertible, and he gets shot in the back. Is he going to have any trouble knowing that he's been shot? Is there going to be any doubt in his mind? Isn't he going to act like a man who's been shot? And once he knows that he is being shot at, he also knows that they are going to keep shooting until he's dead. So, he's going to get down, right? And he's going to get his wife to get down. And the people in front of him, he's going to want them to get down too. But, he didn't do any of that. so, WHY WASN'T HIS MIND WORKING? How did he get so instantly lobotomized? 

But, it's not just his strange behavior. His wife was sitting next to him. So ladies, if you were riding in a convertible, and your husband sitting right next to you, was shot in the back, don't you think you would know it? We know from watching the Zapruder film that Jackie knew that something was wrong with Jack, but she didn't know what. If she knew he had been shot, don't you think she would have gotten down? And we also know from her own testimony that she did not know that he had been shot. And I'm not just talking about the sound of the gunshot. She, like others, said she thought it was the sound of the motorcycles backfiring. But, when she looked at him and realized that something was wrong, the first thing she noticed was that he had a "quizzical" look on his face. Who responds that way to getting shot with a bullet in the back? "Hmmm, I think I felt something. What was that? That's weird." That is not what is going through your mind when you have been shot in the back with a bullet, let alone for the bullet to tunnel through your neck from back to front.   

And, I hope I have convinced you that JFK was shot in the back high on the hill. We have three photographs of him riding down the hill NOT WAVING. You know he was a very engaging and very personable President. Look at the Croft photo with the enthusiastic, "Croft Ladies." Look how adoring they are. Why isn't he responding to them? It's because he was shot in the back. This whole photo is so goofy. Jackie could not have had her head turned that much. That is way too much rotation. And why does she look so glum? Look: either she thinks that all is well, or she knows he's been shot. She did not that he was shot. Therefore, why is she looking like that? She is a politician's wife, and she has a job to do. It's to wave at the people and be nice. Why isn't she does it? It's because that is a manipulated image, and the objective was to obscure JFK's face. Notice that we can't see his eyes, or it looks like his eyes were closed. He probably had a startled look on his face. Why? Because was just shot! It was just a little before this that he was shot in the back.  

But again, if it were a bullet, he would have felt it and known it. They all would have known it. But, whatever it was was so slight, that it was hard to tell that anything major had happened. 

Do you know how they like to say which frame of the Zapruder film corresponds to the Altgens photo? I'm sure the famed JFK researcher John Costella would say that it is a complete waste of time to do that, and I agree. But, they do it anyway, and it's usually frame 255 that they settle on, which is ridiculous. 

But, what frame of the Zapruder film corresponds to the Croft photo? NOBODY EVEN ASKS! It isn't even on the radar. That's because there is nothing remotely close to what we see in the Croft photo in the Zapruder film. Why isn't it there? It's because they cut out that whole swath of him riding down the hill having been shot in the back! They took out a big, huge section of the film. Of all the alterations they made, and they made a ton of them, that's the biggest one. 

But, JFK did get shot in the back. and it was well below his neck. You can see the bullet hole in his jacket.

Now, look at this image because you are looking at it correctly for the first time in your life. It's one of many images from the JFK assassination that is shown left-to-right flipped. I unflipped it. He was shot on the right side of his back. That is not in dispute. So, this is how the picture should look.

Look how close to the center that is. Stop thinking that a full met jacket bullet bored into his back there. And stop thinking that a bullet hit him at flight speed there and came to zero velocity in one inch. That is an impossible degree of deceleration. And anything that did decelerate that fast would do a colossal amount of damage and destruction. That's because the energy has to go somewhere. Energy can't be created or destroyed. The bullet can't just stop. It has to take its energy out on something, including itself. But, he wasn't hit with a bullet. It was a dart. An ice dart, loaded with a drug. It never happened before, but it happened then. 
 

Tomorrow is the final day of the shoot of The Pro Bono Watchman which stars the Emmy award-winning actor Mike Gassaway. Although I'm sure the CIA already has a file on me, they should definitely watch this film because they're in it. The CIA plays a big role in the story. I'm going to make them famous. It's what I do.  

  

I don't know who is filling in for Biden's brain right now, but he or she is one hell of a chess player. And it's really quite amazing because the United States signed the Doha agreement in front of representatives from many countries, organizations, and the United Nations. And the terms were very clear: we agreed to be completely out of Afghanistan by May 1.

So now, like an actor, Biden announces the glad tidings that we are leaving Afghanistan, that the 20 year war is ending, the Forever War is behind us now, etc. etc. He didn't say one word about us breaching the contract-  to just helping ourselves to a 4 month extension. 

Some are saying that the May 1 deadline isn't practical because it takes time to remove 2500 troops, but that deadline was on the books for almost a year. It wasn't just sprung on us. 

And be aware that the blather about leaving in September is just that: blather. Without the slightest stumble, they could just glibly say later that because of this or that that the Taliban did, that we ain't leaving; we're staying. 

In other words, the difference between saying "we're leaving in September" and "we're staying indefinitely" is bubkis.

The Taliban responded to it, as I expected, saying that it's a breach, a violation, a non-compliance. The big question is: are they going to resume attacking Americans after May 1? Of course, I don't know. But, see if you think this sounds like a threat because to me it sounds like a threat.  

Now as the agreement is being breached by America, it in principle opens the way for the Mujahideen of Islamic Emirate to take every necessary countermeasure, hence the American side will be held responsible for all future consequences, and not the Islamic Emirate.

I knew we weren't going to leave, and I told you so. But, what I didn't anticipate is the psychological game they are now playing, where they are making staying look like leaving. Touche' Biden's brain. 

So, what is the Taliban going to do now? Again, I don't know. But, I think it's going to be worse than what Biden and his brain are expecting. 

 

The Splat Heard 'Round The World

The Splat. That's what JFK's shot in the back was. It wasn't a bullet that tunneled into his body. It was a sharp but delicate object that just pierced his skin a little and then shattered and splattered, and then poof, it was gone. 

A bullet can't do that. The JFK community dropped the ball on this. From the beginning, and all along, they rejected the ridiculous Single Bullet Theory. But when left with a super-shallow wound in his back, how did they explain it? Nothing but cockamamie ideas- as if the JFK assassination occurred within its own physical universe. 

Think back to high school when you took Driver's Ed. You were taught that a car requires one car length of stopping distance for every 10 miles per hour of speed. So, a car going 60 mph needs 6 car lengths to stop. A bullet travels  at least1200 mph and up to 2800. So, if it were a car, imagine how much distance it would require to stop. 

Of course, a car will eventually stop even with no braking at all. What causes it to stop? Friction. Friction from the road, and also, air resistance. 

Of course, a bullet entering the body is not going to encounter air resistance, but the body's tissues provide resistance. Remember Newton. The bullet and the tissues both act on each other. The tissues suffer damage and disruption, in a word: trauma. The bullet suffers loss of velocity, but it gets damaged too. It may not be much, but it's something. 

So, if a FMJ bullet hit JFK the back, at the speed that it was going, it is mathematically possible to calculate the resistance of his tissues (and we're not talking about a lot of tissue because the bullet did not even reach muscle. It went through the skin to the fascia.) 

If you know the momentum  and propulsive force of the bullet, and you also know the resistance of the tissues, you can determine the distance that a bullet will travel thorough any given tissues. It's a mater of physics and mathematics. 

And for an FMJ bullet traveling at bullet-speed, and going through skin and fascia, there is no way that such a bullet could reach zero velocity in that short a distance. From bullet speed to absolute stillness just from passing through skin and fascia? No way! The mathematics doesn't add up.

I keep telling you: it was not a bullet. It was a very specialized missile that was essentially made of ice. 

What do you know about the physics of water? Did you know that water is the only substance that expands when it's frozen? Are you aware of how unstable ice (frozen water) is? Have you noticed that all you have to do is pour room temperature water over ice cubes, and they start cracking and breaking apart. That's how unstable ice is. And there are ways of making it more unstable. For instance, the more minerals there are in the water, the more unstable the ice is. That's because the minerals interfere with the crystalline structure of the hydrogen/oxygen bonds in the ice. 

Just as an ice cube that you dig out of the tray can burst, so can an ice spicule that pierces your skin. And if it's formulated correctly, it can literally blow up. 

And that is what happened to John F. Kennedy. He wasn't hit in the back with a bullet. If he was, there is no way it could have stopped so fast. But, an ice flechette? Yes. That can be designed to burst on impact, where it just penetrates a little and then blows up. I'm not talking about melting. I'm talking about blowing up into tiny little pieces of ice, which then melt very quickly because they are so small.

And let's also remember that NO BULLET WAS FOUND IN JFK'S BACK. And no bullet was found anywhere else.  And that is another reason to reject the idea that he was hit with a bullet. 

Bullets don't hit their target and disappear, but an ice spicule does, or at least, it can- if it's made right. 

Stop thinking that this is a wild theory. The theory that a solid bullet hit him at speed and went to zero velocity just from passing through clothes and skin, that's the wild theory. That does not constitute enough resistance to stop such a bullet. But, the ice flechette? Don't you get it? It was designed to do just that.   

 

 

 

The world is waiting to see if Eric Nelson, the lawyer of Derek Chauvin, is going to have him take the stand in the George Floyd murder trial.  

I don't know if he is or isn't, but I do know that the dumbest decision ever made, in that regard, was that of Jack Ruby's legal team to not have Ruby take the stand. 

It was so incredibly stupid, I have to wonder if they were really working for the other side. What were they afraid of? That the prosecution would trip him up? Over what? All he had to do was tell the truth. The facts of the case spoke loudly that he had no intention of shooting Oswald. 

If Ruby intended to shoot Oswald, you know, because he was a big Mafioso and his Capo ordered him to do it, he would have known that shooting Oswald in a crowd of police was going to result in his immediate arrest. Right? And he would have known that he wasn't going home again after that- ever. He wasn't going back to his life again- ever. So, his nightclubs, his beloved dogs, and everything else in his life was going to be lost. He would have made arrangements. But, not only did he not make arrangements, he actually brought one of the dogs, Sheba, with him and left her in the car. He dearly loved Sheba, and he often referred to her as his wife. 

This was proof-positive that Ruby had no thought of killing Oswald, and all that talk about a Mafia order is complete, utter nonsense.  

Ruby would have made a great witness for himself if his lawyers just let him tell the truth. But no; right away, his first lawyer, Tom Howard, instructed him to say that he shot Oswald to spare Jackie a trip to Dallas. Howard made it up, and it was the worst legal advice ever given. And when Belli was in charge, he didn't use it. He didn't tell the jury that Ruby shot Oswald to make it easy on Jackie. He said that Ruby shot Oswald because he has a disease, psychomotor epilepsy. You know how an epileptic has involuntary movements, right? You know how an epileptic flails his arms and swings his body, etc.  Belli actually had the nerve to claim that in Ruby's case, his epilepsy manifested with the movement of him taking his gun out of his pocket, rushing Oswald, and shooting him. And you thought the Twinkie defense was bad. 

An epileptic seizure is a chaotic discharge of nervous energy; a wild, uncontrolled eruption of random, disordered and unorganized contractions. To attribute the honed action of taking a handgun, which involves intricate manual dexterity, and rushing someone and shooting him to epilepsy is beyond wrong. It's lunacy. 

So, why did Belli do it? It's because he knew that Ruby had no memory of shooting Oswald. Ruby told him that that all he remembered was going to the garage and being jumped by police. He didn't remember anything else. But, there was nothing else to remember. Ruby was telling him the truth, the literal and complete truth. It was the Dallas Police who were lying, and Belli should have realized it. 

Bill Gates posted an image of himself getting a Covid vaccine, except it isn't him.

That guy has a relatively round head while Gate's head is more geometric. 

Here they are side by side: 

They definitely have similar hair, but other than that, why would anyone think they are the same man?

He spoke of getting the vaccine, and I don't doubt that he did. This is the whole tweet:

Here is another comparison that shows how different their ears are. 

But again, I don't doubt that he got the vaccine. Why should I doubt it when I know very well that millions of people are clamoring to get it and are waiting one long lines to do it?  Even though he has made millions of dollars off vaccines,  the reason he invests in vaccine-makers is because he believes in vaccines.  

So, why didn't he use a real image of himself getting it? I don't know. I could only speculate. What interests me more is not that he used a body double but that he couldn't find a better one.  As body doubles go,  it was pretty shabby, as bad as this:

That is supposed to be Jack Ruby, but it definitely isn't him. His face was rounder; his nose was very narrow, from bridge to tip, whereas Ruby's nose was pyramidal, with a great deal of bulbous tip cartilage. You can see the short forehead on the guy in the big picture, which makes his face look round.  

But, that guy is supposed to be the Garage Shooter of Lee Harvey Oswald, seen hovering with detectives on the 3rd floor of the Dallas Police Department a couple minutes after the Oswald shooting.

I note in the picture that someone took a Sharpie to his eyes and blackened them out. He has black stripes instead of eyes, and that is not a photographic effect. And this really tells us something because if this guy was the Garage Shooter, then Jack Ruby wasn't.

So, to sum up: both are fake images involving body doubles, neither of which were very good. But, Gates really did get the Covid vaccine, while Jack Ruby did not kill Lee Harvey Oswald.