These two are the same shirt, and the image on the right from the Malcolm Couch film is the ONLY authentic image of Billy Lovelady on 11/22/63. All the rest are bogus. Can't you see it's the same shirt, with the short sleeves, the cuff on the sleeves, and you can even see the neat square margin on both of them, except that on the right, they must have added that tail in back just to throw us off. But, if you look at it in front and then compare to the other side, you'll see that it's the same shirt. It's also the same man. That's what Billy Lovelady wore that day, so obviously, he wasn't Doorman. The whole idea that he was Doorman was a grotesque, Kennedy-killing lie. 

 

It should be obvious at first glance that this can't possibly be Mary Moorman's photo, and that's because she had waited there for hours, just standing there, to obtain that picture, and there is no way she would have waited to snap the shutter until the Kennedy's were past her, to where it was just the back of their heads. She wouldn't even have waited until they were in profile. She would have shot them before that, where their faces were in view. Because: it's all about capturing the faces. 

So, this image has to be VERY different from the one she took. And of course, there is the thumbprint. They told her that an FBI agent accidentally imparted the thumbprint, but are you buying it? He would have had to have white paint or white glue on his thumb. There is no way a plain thumb could have done that to a dry photo. That's what the thumbprint is doing: hiding him. This is how it looked before they did it. 

Clearly, it was done on purpose to cover up BJ Martin who was captured from Babushka's angle but not Mary's angle. 

But again, the whole photo has got to be very different from the one Mary took. So, how did they get her to go along with this fraud? I think I know. I think they must have paid her a large sum of money. 

"You see, Mary, we realize that we damaged your historic photo with that thumbprint, and you deserve to be compensated for that. So, we are going to give you x amount of money, but we are going to have to ask you to sign this confidentiality agreement. It means that you can't tell anyone that we paid you; ever. It's our little secret. But, at least now, you have your photo back, and you also have enough money to change your financial status for the rest of your life. So, are we good?"

Keep in mind that it is absolutely certain that to get Marina Oswald to go along with all the things they wanted her to say, that they directed a large sum of money to her. In her case, it didn't come directly from the government. It came from various media outlets; from gifts from the American people who felt sorry for her; from an Italian film company who paid her $125,000 for the rights to her story for the purpose of making a film that was never made, and that, I think, was the largest chunk. I think all together it was about $250,00, but that was in 1964 money. In today's money it would be about $2 million.  So, it was a hell of a green poultice, and it had Marina singing like a canary about Oswald and his rifle, and shooting at Walker, and wanting to shoot Nixon, etc. etc. etc.  It was all bull shit. She said she took the Backyard photo in February, even though it was obviously a warm day, a lot warmer than February. And even worse was that, according to the story, he didn't even own the rifle yet in February. Those kind of blatant dealbreakers were riddled throughout her stories.   

Marina was thoroughly MK-ULTRA'd which included giving her not just money but also love in the form of sex plus full immersion in a "Oswald as monster" world. They took her through the Looking Glass or down the Yellow Brick Road. 

Now, I'm not saying it was that bad with Mary Moorman. She got the milder version of it. She was visited by federal agents frequently because they had to come often to borrow and return her photo. I'm sure that they were sizing her up; working her; and trying to figure out how moldable she was. Apparently, her photo contained something that was very damaging to the Official Story. The decision to replace it was probably not made all at once. They probably started by trying to alter it. But, they were never satisfied. But eventually, from talking to her, they gained confidence and conviction that she would accept the swap without protest. 

But, of course, they would have sought to sweeten the deal by attaching a large sum of money to it. After all, that didn't cost anything. Money is something that the government prints, and they were printing it then. Of course, they weren't printing trillions then as they are today. But, they were printing millions and billions, and whatever they had to give Mary was bupkis.  

So, that's what I think happened. I think they paid her off to vouch for the phony "Moorman photo" that was really taken by Babushka Lady. 

The history of the issue of Oswald in the doorway is so strewn with lies, fraud, and deception by those denying it was him, that their malfeasance- in creating the phony debate about it- is blatantly and nakedly obvious. 

First, realize that people from all over the world recognized Oswald in the doorway. I heard from a woman in Russia who said that her uncle knew Oswald, and as soon as he saw the Altgens photo, he said, "That is Alek." 

Of course, it was followed by a public announcement stating that it was another TSBD employee Billy Lovelady who happened to look a lot like Oswald.

If that were the truth, they would have called a press conference and presented Lovelady to the world. And they would have let him speak to the world. And they would have disseminated pictures of him to the press. But, all they did was lip-flap it. They just claimed it. They never showed any pictures of Lovelady, and they never intended to. Even when the FBI took pictures of Lovelady, they neve showed them to the world. They just sent them to the Warren Commission along with a letter from J. Edgar Hoover.  And the WC didn't publish the images either. The only reason the world found out about those images is because Harold Weisberg dug them out of the "document pile" that the Warren Commission left behind. 

So, they didn't show Lovelady to the world, and they didn't show pictures of Lovelady to the world. The first image of Lovelady that they finally showed the world was introduced 3 years later in 1966. And it was phony! It wasn't him. 

That image was supposedly taken 15 minutes after the shooting in front the TSBD, but Billy Lovelady was not there at the time. He was inside the building. He was guarding the freight elevator, and then he was taking the police up to the 6th floor. There is no chance that he was out in front at that time. So, that guy can't be Lovelady, but neither can he be Doorman.

How could those two be the same man, when Doorman looks thin and gaunt, while "Gorilla Man" (as Jim Fetzer dubbed him) looks burly? How can they be the same man when Doorman's shirt was gaped open while Gorilla Man's shirt was closed and snug? And by the way: their shirt patterns are very different. Gorilla Man's was plaid, while Doorman's was splotchy. And actually, what we're seeing on Doorman's shirt is due to photographic haze and distortion and also light reflection. We should not assume that his shirt actually looked like that, that that was the "pattern." 

The whole case for Doorman being Lovelady was strewn with lies and corruption and downright evil- from the beginning.  It's rank, exposed, naked evil. 

And that was just the start. More phony images of Lovelady were to follow; images that did not look like him; that did not look like Doorman; and that did not look like each other. It has been a cavalcade of fraud and contradictions. 

And by the time of the HSCA which started in 1976, so 13 years after the assassination, Lovelady was a wreck. He was hiding out in Colorado, avoiding the press as much as he could. And when HSCA lawyer Ken Booten went to see him, Lovelady pleaded with him not to make him go to Washington to testify. And Booten agreed. Why? It's because he could see for himself that Lovelady was a wreck and would make a lousy witness. Simply put: Lovelady was not a good liar; he was a terrible liar. So, Booten quit his job with the HSCA to become Lovelady's lawyer. When has that ever happened before or since in the history of jurisprudence? And Lovelady wasn't even a defendant. He wasn't being accused of anything. So, what did he need a lawyer for? 

And then, just when the HSCA Final Report was being released, 41 year old Billy Lovelady died suddenly of a "heart attack." I think it's more likely that he died from the heart attack gun. You know, the one that was loaded with an ice dart containing a nerve agent, shot into JFK high on the hill to soften him up for the turkey shoot, so that he would be a helpless and cooperative victim when he entered the Kill zone. Except: in Billie's case, they stuck with the original plan and armed the gun with a drug that would mimic a heart attack. 

Realize also that the Altgens photo containing Oswald in the doorway is probably the most abominated photograph in the history of  photography. It was so crudely and grossly altered, it turned the doorway into a freak show. 

The Altgens Family

Da dah nah nah.

Da dah nah nah.

Da dah nah nah; Da dah nah nah; Da dah nah nah.

They're creepy and they're kooky, 

Mysterious and spooky, 

They're all together ooky, 

The Altgens Family. 

 

Their doorway's a museum 

When people come to see 'em 

They really are a scree'um 

The Altgens Family. 

 

Neat.

 

Sweet.

 

Petite.

 

So get a witches shawl on 

A broomstick you can crawl on 

We're gonna pay a call on 

The Altgens Family.

 

 

Their names are still debated,

Black Hole and Obfuscated,

Their histories are related,

The Altgens Family.

 

See Oswald is the Doorman,

He doesn't have a prayer, Man,

Lovelady's got no hair, Man,

The Altgens Family

 

Lee.

 

 

Shel-ly'.

 

 

Bil-ly'.

 

 

Lee's innocent, you dodo,

Scan Altgens' altered photo

For characters we all know,

The Altgens Family.

The point is: there is no debate. There is just the truth and an outrageous, egregious campaign to lie about it. And that's from the very beginning, from the very day of it. The fact is that Doorman looks like Oswald, and he is wearing Oswald's clothes. It's one thing to lie and say that Oswald and Lovelady looked alike, that they were doppelgangers. But, even doppelgangers don't wear the same clothes, unless perhaps they're both participating in an Elvis impersonation contest. 

Anyone who says that these two aren't the same man is either very stupid or very evil. But, that/s not to say that they can't be both. 

 

 

Mike, the Babushka Lady was not Beverly Arnold. Beverly Arnold was a 17 year old girl at the time. You can see at first glance that Babushka Lady was a middle-aged woman. Look at the girth on her. She might have had a 17 year old daughter.

 

 We couldn't beat the Taliban with guns or bombs, but we're still trying to beat them with words, as the anti-Taliban propaganda continues non-stop. 

And besides being unable to stop the Taliban, we couldn't stop ordinary Afghans from storming our cargo plane. And once they did, our crew apparently decided, "ah, what the hell."

So, they took off with them, but not before taking a picture.

So, this was a U.S. Military decision: to take off with all those people who forced themselves on the plane to Qater. But, I'm not buying it. If they really forced themselves on the plane, then it didn't happen in an orderly way; it was like a stampede. And you know what happens in a stampede; stampeders get hurt. They can even get killed. And they said that 7 people have died at the Kabul airport so far. But, these people look awfully relaxed and unrumpled for being in such a hazardous situation. 

And wouldn't this have to be a super-spreader event? What about Covid? What about the Delta variant? What's Fauci got to say about this? I see only one woman on the left wearing a mask. And that's amazing because here in Texas where I live, they ended the mask mandates, but when you go in the supermarket or Walmart, I'd say about half the people and all the employees are still wearing masks. Of course, I don't. I have never worn the mask when it wasn't mandatory. 

But, the Americans decided to just take off with them, eh? It's a 3 hour flight from Kabul to Doha, Qater. And you know how people are; they have to pee and poop. So, how was that going to happen here? And people can have all kinds of crises: medical, psychiatric, or both. So, what if somebody gets in a bad way? What if someone gets in acute pain? What if someone goes berserk? What if a fight breaks out between two or more people? How can you exert any control at all in a situation like this?  

People can go 3 hours without eating, but what if someone gets seriously thirsty? And look at the bald guy on the left holding the baby. Where's the baby's mother? Or is he a single father? And why does he looks so relaxed, considering how easily a baby can get hurt or killed in a mob commotion? Why do they all look so relaxed? 

And what happens when you get them to Doha? Do all these people know someone in Doha who was coming to the airport to pick them up? Of course not. These people were an instant humanitarian crisis for the U.S. government and the government of Qatar. So, did we actually fly them to Doha and dump them on the Qatar authorities? Where the hell did we get the nerve to do that? And if we really did do it, then it only goes to show that the U.S. thinks it owns the world and can just impose and commandeer with complete abandon. And we're not talking about just putting them up overnight. It's an instant ongoing responsibility to take care of them. But, if it really happened, I don't doubt that our State Department will eventually cut a huge check to Qatar because one thing we have an unlimited and unquenchable supply of is money. We can conjure up any amount of it. 

But, why spend the taxpayer's money that way? (although the U.S. government gets most of its money from Federal Reserve computers and printing presses rather than taxpayers) I can answer that: It's to make the Taliban look bad; to make it look like very few Afghans support the Taliban, when there is no way the Taliban could have done what it did over the last week without widespread support from the Afghan populace. 

Look at that mob. And notice that there are only a few children, even though the adults don't look that old. They don't look like grandparents; they look like parents.  So, how could you have so many people of child-rearing age fleeing the country without their children? And obviously there are a lot more males than females? So where were their wives? Left behind? 

And obviously the picture was taken from a high elevation. So, a crew member whipped out his cell phone? And then what? Turned it over to the press? 

And since the cargo plane was about to take off when the people forced themselves on, what was the cargo supposed to be? Had these people not shown up, what was the plane going to be flying away besides the crew? Or are we just sending planes there to take out any Afghans who want to leave Afghanistan? 

The photo came from Defense One, which is a news organization that focuses on the military. It's a publication of GovExec Media, which focuses on all things government. 

Government Executive Media Group Overview

• Website:www.govexec.com
• Headquarters:
  Washington, DC
• Size:
  51 to 200 Employees
• Founded:
  1969
• Type:
  Company - Private
• Industry:
  Publishing
• Revenue:
  $25 to $50 million (USD)

The public sector division of Atlantic Media, Government Executive Media Group is dedicated to providing government and national security leaders with trusted and useful insights and best practices to help them advance their organizations’ missions. Through its market-leading Government Executive, Nextgov, Defense One, and Route Fifty brands, GEMG reaches over one million government influencers nationwide each month across digital, print and events offerings.

51 to 200 employees? That's a 4-fold range. What accounts for that? Is it seasonal? Do they have part-time workers?  And that's a hell of a lot of revenue to be generated by that few employees. 

 

  

This rendering of the Moorman photo shows very well something that I have been claiming for a long time: that there are two motorcycles and two motorcycle cops close together there, and hiding one of them was the purpose for adding the white thumbprint. I put a 1 and a 2 to indicate the back of each motorcycle. 

 And if you look closely, you can see the other motorcyclist, BJ Martin, just his back, right in front of Hargis. 

So, what's going on? What's going on is that image was taken by Babushka Lady because she was the only one who was in position to take it. Look how big Cheney is in comparison to Kennedy. Look how big his head is in comparison to Kennedy's. Why is that? It's because near objects appear larger in a photo, and Hargis was closer to the photographer, Babushka Lady. Look:

The only one in that picture who could capture an image in which Hargis looms larger compared to JFK is Babushka Lady. That's because she was only a short distance from Hargis, and Kennedy was farther away ON THE SAME VECTOR. So, that extra distance was additive. Mary Moorman doesn't even have the camera up to her eyes at that moment. Look at the position of her arms compared to those of BL, who is shooting. 

Notice also that only one front motorcycle wheel stands out, even though you see both Cheney and Martin. This was taken by Muchmore, who was back and to the left of BL. So, the parallax shifted Martin back a little. But, from BL's position, we get a similar image except Martin appears slightly in front of Hargis.

 Babushka Lady took the Moorman photo. There is no doubt about it. There is no one else who could possibly have taken it. There is no chance that Mary Moorman took it, that is, if you believe in the laws of physics and optics. 

Mary took her photo much earlier. She came to claim that she took it when they were exactly even with her, but I have to believe that she said that just to accommodate the official story. She wouldn't have waited that long because if you do, the best you are going to do is capture a picture of them in profile, which is not as good as catching their faces more directly. So, I think she must have taken her picture slightly before that, and it must have captured something that they didn't want us to see. They kept "borrowing" her photo, even though they had numerous copies. They did it because if they were going to change them, they had to change hers. And I'm sure they tried to change her photo. But, eventually, they gave up on it. Or perhaps they accidentally destroyed it. And so, they took an image of BL's, which showed Hargis and Martin from her perspective, which is not how Mary's photo was, which apparently only showed Hargis, So they took Martin out of it by using the white thumbprint. 

I regret that the great Jack White spent oodles of time analyzing the Moorman photo from the perspective of line of sight to try to determine Mary's exact position. And he concluded from it that she was in the street. But, the whole premise was wrong because the photo he was measuring was not Mary's photo. It had nothing whatsoever to do with Mary. That whole analysis was defunct from the get-go. 

Mary Moorman did NOT take the Moorman photo. They have been bamboozling us for nearly 58 years.  

Americans mire in delusion rather than face reality. 

"I really bristle, and I know a lot of other veterans do too when I hear people say the Afghan war was a failure,’’  Congressman Waltz said. "I certainly think we could have done a lot of things better across multiple administrations. But the fact that we haven't suffered another 9/11 — and that al-Qaida has been pressured and decimated — is a success. From a counterterrorism standpoint, Americans are safe because of it.”

RC: I put that thought process to work in my film, The Pro Bono Watchman, in which an old man Hank is monitoring the visits between a 6 year old girl Bonnie and her wayward father who has a violent past. On one outing to the park, he observes her asking her father for a handkerchief, but he doesn't have one. Hank, however, does have a clean handkerchief, so he goes up and offers it to her. 

 HANK

Young Lady, may I offer you a nice, clean, fresh handkerchief?

Then he hands it to her. She takes it and blows her nose. Then, she makes it into a ball and hands it back to him. 

BONNIE

Thank you.    

HANK 

You’re welcome.

BONNIE

I know who you are. You’re the man who follows us. Daddy says you’re like his shadow. So, I call you Shadow Man. 

HANK

Hmmm, that isn't bad. In fact, that's pretty good. But, I think I would rather be called Watch Man. Because that’s who I really am: the Watchman.  

BONNIE

Who are you watching? 

HANK

I’m watching you, Darlin’. 

BONNIE

Why are you watching me?

HANK

To make sure nothing happens to you.  

BONNIE

What could happen to me? 

HANK

Well, let’s see. You could, ah... 

Hank is thinking.  

HANK (CONT’D)

You could get, ah...

Still thinking. 

HANK (CONT’D)

Bit by a tiger.

BONNIE

But, there are no tigers around here.

HANK

You see how good a Watchman I am?  

. 

I