Friday, October 21, 2016

That is Bookhout. James W. Bookhout. And they were going to move Heaven and Earth to hide that fact. Why? Because if word got out that Bookhout was that short, then the parallel to the short short Garage Shooter would be obvious.

So, they altered this cadet photo, and in ways more devious than anyone ever imagined- until now. 

And I don't mind using the word "imagine," and I don't mean it in the sense that I am imagining things. I mean it in the sense of opening one's mind to possibilities that are beyond everyday experience and expectations. Another way I could put it is the way Kevin Costner did in JFK the movie. "We are through the Looking Glass, people." Let's hone in:

 OK, so we are going to look at Bookhout, but before we do, let's look at the guy next to him, to his left, so our right. Skip the guy who is a row up. Now, as we look at this other guy, I want you to look at his ears. Notice our shriveled his right ear looks. Note first that ears tend to be VERY symmetrical in people. EXTREMELY symmetrical. Note also that in this case, we are seeing more of the right side of his face. Look how the right side of his neck (on our left) is in view, but the left side is not. So, we have a greater perspective and a better view of the side with the shriveled ear. So, why does that ear look so small and shriveled and so completely out of sync with the other ear? It's because "they" did it. And the reason they did it is because they wanted to ease into acceptance, make easy to swallow, what they did to Bookhout's left ear. So, let's look at that now. You notice that it looks half missing. And no, it's not because he has his head turned; he doesn't. It's because "they" took out half his ear. Why? Because they didn't want us comparing it to other images of Bookhout. So, we are less likely to be put off by that with the other distorted ear in the picture. 

Now, the other thing they did was mess with his nose. Bookhout had a very narrow nose and pinched nostrils. They had to get rid of that on the short, fat guy. 

Compare the width of the left side of his nose (on our right) with the right side of his nose (on our left). His left side is a lot wider. And no, it is not due to the angle of the picture because we are looking at him straight-on. He does not have his head turned, and the camera is right in front of him. The two sides of his nose should look symmetrical. Now, it's true that noses can be asymmetrical, but not as asymmetrical as that. That's beyond the pale. That is an altered image. They plopped more nose on him to hide the fact that he is James Bookhout, short James Bookhout. 

Tonight, I did The New JFK Show with Gary King, Don Fox, and Jim Fetzer. It was #121, and it was all Bookhout. And I think it was a great show. We had a lot of laughs, a lot of fun, while going over some very important stuff. I was just thinking tonight how the scheme to keep James Bookhout hidden was really very intricate. Just think: officially, there are NO images of him from the JFK assassination. None. 

You've got Linda Zambinini speculating that a certain tall young man from the Midnight Press Conference was Bookhout, but Bookhout made it clear that he did not attend the Midnight Press Conference. And then, on the basis of this one person speculating without foundation that this guy was Bookhout, the Idiot Backes treats it like money in the bank and starts declaring the guy to be Bookhout as if it's part of the official record. It is not.

And I realize that images that I assign to him from the assassination aren't officially recognized either. But, the point is that there are no images of him that are officially recognized, even though he was practically attached to Oswald at the hip for two days.

In other words: that's a smoking gun in itself.

But, what's worse is the fact that the few images we have from his earlier life have all been doctored, with drag queen eye brows and more.  And that too is a smoking gun.

The discovery by XXX that in the cadets photo, he's the short, roly-poly guy not the tall guy on the far right is another smoking gun.

You see, they didn't want to admit that he was short- like the Garage Shooter. He was shorter than Ruby- as was the Garage Shooter. 

So, watch the The New JFK Show #121 which Gary King will be posting on Youtube tomorrow. 

Thursday, October 20, 2016

For the first time, my page Likes for the Oswald Innocence Campaign on Facebook has exceeded 1000. It's up to 1004, at this moment. And it's due to Bookhout. It's all due to Bookhout. 

I call this the long face/round face collage:

This is brandished as a movie frame that mimics the Jackson photo, but who took it? What film is it from? If someone duplicated the Jackson photo in a film, then the cameraman must have been over where Jackson was, and his entire film should reflect that. So, where is this from?

I want to see it in the movie. I want to watch the movie and stop it when it gets to that frame. And if it isn't possible, then it tells me everything I need to know about this frame. Fake. Fake. Fake. 
Here is how I've done up this collage. I called it the Cheese collage.

This is the whole Jackson photo, and it gives us an idea where Bob Jackson was, which is on the opposite side from where "Ruby" was.

So, there was his cubbyhole, and most of the Newsmen were to the right of it.

Do you, or do you not, see that it shows the throng of Newsmen to the right? But, obviously, Jackson must have been to the left, and way to the left.

 Jackson was well to the left of the left corner. "Ruby" was way over on the right, amidst the throng of Newsmen.

Considering how far away Jackson was, I'm surprised that Jackson glibly said that "Ruby" was to his right. "Ruby" was nowhere near him. Ruby was at the other pole of the area, and approached from the opposite angle.

I am just going to have to talk to Bob Jackson.