Friday, November 30, 2018

This really is a very good match. Realize that the cartilage of the nose and the ears continue to grow throughout life, and it is stimulated by gravity. And I am guessing that he has a little rosacea going on there above, accounting for the redness in his face. But notice two things: first, the slightly Asian look of his eyes. You're seeing it top and bottom. And second, the pattern of his smile, which involves the whole face- there is a lot of similarity in the nueromuscular response there, what he is doing with his eyes, his mouth, and his peri-oral region. So, I am really convinced that that younger man is him, Rafael Cruz, on Main Street, close to Houston, and close enough to lower Elm Street to see it.  
Rafael. That's my birth name. My father called me Rafael. My grandpa called me "Raff." But now, we are going to revisit a Rafael I wrote about in 2016 during the Presidential primary: Rafael Cruz.

If you recall, there was a tabloid ruckus about him being seen with Lee Harvey Oswald in New Orleans, handing out pro-Castro leaflets. I'm not so sure about that image, but I found one of what appears to be him, and certainly looks like him, watching the JFK motorcade in Dallas. 

Well, six days ago, for the first time, Rafael Cruz admitted that he was in Dallas at the time, and he DID watch the motorcade. 

Even the author of the Ft. Worth Star-Telegram article, whose name happens to be Bud Kennedy, said that, although everyone can remember where they were on that fateful day, "as far as I can tell, he never told reporters." 

And I agree. that at the time, Cruz NEVER admitted that he was in Dallas, and he was at the scene watching the JFK motorcade. 

Well, if you recall, I made a big stink because I thought I found an image of him there. 







That is certainly enough likeness to suspect that it was him. 

And Jim Fetzer recognized the man standing next to him at the motorcade: anti-Castro hit man Antonio Veciana. 





In his new 2018 admission, Cruz said that he was having lunch with co-workers at a restaurant named the Music Box on Cedar Springs Road.  “I was having lunch at that restaurant and we came outside and stood on the sidewalk,” he said.

However, the image I found is the famous Dallas Times-Herald photo of the JFK limo taken by Robert Allen on Main Street, shortly before it turned right on Houston Street, at the entrance of Dealey Plaza. The Cruz-like figure could probably see the Kill Zone from where he was.


But, the question now is this: Why didn't Rafael Cruz admit in 2016 that he did indeed watch the JFK motorcade? It's a big deal, don't you think? He could still have denied knowing Lee Harvey Oswald, but why not admit it? Why did he wait until now? And why bother admitting it now? Is it because his son had already been reelected, so he might as well grab some more spotlight while he can? 

Does Rafael Cruz' late admission of being in Dallas at the JFK motorcade give me more confidence that that was him in the Robert Allen photo? Yes, it does.   


Wednesday, November 28, 2018

Thank you, Bill Benton.


Bill Benton The first thing to notice about "Altgens-6" is that there is a LOT of "weird sh*t" going on with this picture...which translates into photo manipulation. Then, as a prime example of this...we have the face of "Door-man" (looking very strange) which clearly appears to be a composite of two or more images. I've been convinced, for sometime, that this is suspect Oswald, but BARE MINIMUM, an honest researcher must needs admit (as indicated above) that there are many strange aspects to this photo...which should raise SERIOUS suspicions. Of course, if you've been at this work for awhile, you'd know that virtually all of the photographic (and other physical) evidence in this case was either altered or destroyed, key chains of evidence were broken, and that witness testimony--in many, many cases--was either ignored or manipulated. Some of these key witnesses (apparently deemed especially problematic), such as Craig Roberts, were even disposed of...even as our 35th American president was in Dallas in 1963.
Manage
Reply1wEdited
Bill Benton The entire case was just FILTHY with corruption and cover-up, and if you cannot see this, this does not speak well of your perception or, perhaps, your integrity. Even the HSCA (which was beset with many problems and determined obstruction) finally conSee More
Manage
Reply13mEdited
Bill Benton Now--finishing up--I should probably remind you that--significantly--Lovelady was wearing a short-sleeved, vertically stripped shirt on that day, which bore NO RESEMBLANCE to the shirt worn by the "Doorman" figure in this photograph. Anyone STILL maintaining that this is Lovelady needs a new eyeglass Rx...or a thorough spanking!!!! The issue was long ago resolved...and I have no interest AT ALL in LN "True Believer" Blockhead propaganda about it (like found on the "Fairplay for JFK" webpage or a terribly embarrassing "Mysteries in the Museum" recent episode. These people are as intelligent and honest as the members of the "Flat-Earth Society"...or those who are convinced that 2 + 2 = 5. (or those who insist that anyone not believing in the Holy Trinity should be put excommunicated, or maybe STONED)!!
Manage
Reply8mEdited
Bill Benton Lone Nutter idiots fall solidly in the category of "Special Pleading." No amount of evidence which contradicts the Official Narrative will satisfy them, because--FROM THE VERY START--they have ALREADY made up their minds. Attempting some polite dialog with one of these lunkheads is a futile enterprise, about as promising as a hitting your head against a brick wall, and expecting some brilliant idea to suddenly and miraculously appear. Their "meat" is LN doctrine-dogma, and NOTHING ELSE!!!
I found a JFK assassination video that I like very much. It was made by a young couple, Aaron and Melissa Dykes of truthstreammedia.com. And when I say they are young, I mean in their 20s. It is very heartening to me to see people that young championing JFK truth because they weren't alive when JFK was President or when he was gunned down, and they weren't close to being alive. And yet, they care. Imagine that. 

The title of it is deceiving. It is: The Open and Shut Case of Lee Harvey Oswald, Lone Assassin.  It's facetious, and they are facetious throughout the video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnjFREGmVcQ


They do a great job of destroying the so-called evidence against Oswald. It includes video of Lee Bowers. They repeatedly refer to the suspicious and untimely deaths. And the whole thing is immersed in cynicism, mockery, and humor. They are laughing at the official story of the JFK assassination, and it deserves to be laughed at by all people of intelligence. 

Now, what I hope for is that the next 20-somethings to get involved in the JFK truth movement are those with the last name of Kennedy. Why not? He was their own flesh and blood.  Why should they support the Big Lie? It's time we got a Kennedy to roll up his or her sleeves and join the fight.  


Here's something else: Since this was mid-morning on Sunday morning, and it was after the final interrogation, it means that that final interrogation didn't last that long. It was no marathon session, as they would have us believe.  In fact, just the opposite, it was very brief. 

If Oswald was checked out of his 5th floor jail cell between 9:30 and 10, and this was shortly after 10, then they weren't in Fritz' office long at all.


 So, how could they have that long discussion about Mexico City, where Oswald reversed himself and talked about how cheap everything was there, as per the lying Harry Holmes.

Mr. BELIN. Did he ever say anything about going to Mexico? Was that ever covered?
Mr. HOLMES. Yes. To the extent that mostly about--well--he didn't spend, "Where did you get the money?" He didn't have much money and he said it didn't cost much money. He did say that where he stayed it cost $26 some odd, small ridiculous amount to eat, and another ridiculous small amount to stay all night, and that he went to the Mexican Embassy to try to get this permission to go to Russia by Cuba, but most of the talks that he wanted to talk about was how he got by with a little amount.
They said, "Well, who furnished you the money to go to Mexico?"
"Well, it didn't take much money." And it was along that angle, was the conversation.
Mr. BELIN. Did he admit that he went to Mexico?
Mr. HOLMES. Oh, yes.

Mr. BELIN. Did he say what city in Mexico he went to?
Mr. HOLMES. Mexico City.
Mr. BELIN. Did he say what he did while he was there?
Mr. HOLMES. He went to the Mexican consulate, I guess.
(Discussion off the record.)
Mr. BELIN. Now, with regard to this Mexican trip, did he say who he saw in Mexico?
Mr. HOLMES. Only that he went to the Mexican consulate or Embassy or something and wanted to get permission, or whatever it took to get to Cuba. They refused him and he became angry and he said he burst out of there, and I don't know. I don't recall now why he went into the business about how mad it made him.
He goes over to the Russian Embassy. He was already at the American. This was the Mexican--he wanted to go to Cuba.
Then he went to the Russian Embassy and he said, because he said then he wanted to go to Russia by way of Cuba, still trying to get to Cuba and try that angle and they refused and said, "Come back in 30 days," or something like that. And, he went out of there angry and disgusted.
Mr. BELIN. Did he go to the Cuban Embassy, did he say or not?
Mr. HOLMES. He may have gone there first, but the best of my recollection, it might have been Cuban and then the Russian, wherever he went at first, he wanted to get to Cuba, and then he went to the Russian to go by Cuba.
Mr. BELIN. Did he say why he wanted to go to Cuba?
Mr. HOLMES. No.
Mr. BELIN. Did--this wasn't reported in your interview in the memorandum that you wrote?
Mr. HOLMES. No.
Mr. BELIN. Is this something that you think you might have picked up from just reading the papers, or is this something you remember hearing?
Mr. HOLMES. That is what he said in there.


All of the above is complete, total, utter fabrication. And notice that Holmes referred to Oswald going to the Mexican embassy and then the Mexican consulate, but there is no Mexican embassy or consulate in Mexico. It was Mexico, and only other countries have embassies and consulates in Mexico, not Mexico itself.  Holmes was just blabbering, and he wasn't thinking. 

Oswald never reversed himself on Mexico City. He said he didn't go there in the very first interrogation. All this is bull shit; evil and demonic bull shit.  
I found something big! And it starts with this video, which shows Oswald on Sunday morning. The garage shooting took place at 11:20, and this couldn't have happened much before that. So, here we get to see the real Oswald on Sunday morning. Start at 5 minutes and 30 seconds. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FDDuRSgzFk


Of course, that's a blurry image, but there is a lot I can tell you about it. We know it's Sunday morning because we see Leavelle, and he is wearing his Easter suit, which he only wore on Sunday, and because we hear a reporter say, "they are moving Oswald to the County Jail later today." Notice that Oswald is STILL in a t-shirt. They took his outer shirt from him on Friday at 4 PM, and here on Sunday morning, he is still in just a t-shirt. This was Dallas in late November, and the day after the assassination was distinctly cooler. There was a shift in the weather. When you see men who are comfortable indoors in shirts and ties and hats and jackets, how dare they keep Oswald in just a t-shirt? And, it was a very flimsy t-shirt at that. But, I digress.  

Now, we know that it was the 3rd floor. We know that because that is where the press room was, and that's where they let reporters go. They didn't let them go any higher. Plus, you can hear a reporter say that "they have taken Oswald back upstairs to the 4th floor where the Dallas City Jail is located." Actually, the City Jail was on the 5th floor. But remember, Oswald spent the night up there. So, if they brought him down to the 3rd floor, it was probably for that last interrogation. Why else? And now they were taking him back to the jail. However, the official story has it different. This is what Professor John McAdams shows on his interactive timeline of the life of Lee Harvey Oswald.  

9:30 AM: LHO is signed out of jail in anticipation of a transfer to the county facility.

11:15 AM: The transfer party leaves Fritz' office after a final round of questions.

11:21 AM: LHO is shot by Jack Ruby in the basement of the Dallas city jail.

So, he claims that Oswald was signed out of his jail cell BEFORE the final interrogation, which took place in Fritz' office on the 3rd floor. And it specifically states that "the transfer party leaves Fritz' office after a final round of questions." 

But wait. We just saw that Oswald was taken back upstairs from the 3rd floor. Therefore, what McAdams says can't possibly be true.  

And remember that Oswald still has to change his clothes, or at least, add some clothes. He has to put on a long sleeved shirt and a pull-over sweater. 

So, what time do you think it was? I seriously doubt it was very early in the morning. People aren't that spry very early in the morning, and especially not on Sunday mornings. It seems more like mid-morning. Plus, there was no need  to bring him down to the 3rd floor twice. So, that means this was after the final interrogation, and the transfer party did NOT leave from Fritz' office. You'll notice in the video that Leavelle remains behind. He doesn't go along. Oswald was still in the custody of his usual handlers: Boyd, Sims, and Hall, at least two of whom did off-duty security for Lyndon Johnson when he came to Dallas.  So, where were Boyd, Sims, and Hall taking Oswald at that moment? 

Well, as I said, we know Oswald had to put on other clothes. So, considering the late hour, I think it's very likely that Boyd was taking Oswald to do that, to change his clothes. So, this was Oswald shortly before the spectacle. 

That is DEFINITELY Oswald. Notice how vee-ish his t-shirt is, just like in the doorway. That is his ear, his nose, his eyes, his hair. Also, his neck, with the visible sterno-cleido-mastoid muscle, which was typical of Oswald when he turned his head. 

But wait! The reporter! The one who said they were taking Oswald up to the 4th floor! Maybe that was no mistake. Maybe that is what he was told. And you can't tell me that the Dallas Police didn't know which floor the jail was on. So, why the 4th floor? Well, remember my thesis: THAT JACK RUBY REACHED THE GARAGE MUCH EARLIER THAN 11:17 AND WAS POUNCED UPON AND HUSTLED UP TO THE 5TH FLOOR. 

So, if Ruby was being handled up on the 5th floor, then they couldn't take Oswald up there to change. So, they took Oswald up to the 4th floor to get him ready, to change his clothes, etc. 

So, this was probably about 10:15 AM. Watch the clip again with that in mind. It doesn't seem like early in the morning. It seems like mid-morning.  


So, Oswald is being led. Boyd has got his arm. But, notice that Oswald sought to respond to a reporter. He is listing towards him, as he says something. Oswald is holding Boyd up. But, at some point, Boyd has had enough, and he yanks on Oswald.

Wizard, who is the bald guy? He looks familiar. 

Then, this is the last image of Oswald that we know was really him.


Then, notice that Leavelle stayed behind on the 3rd floor. Hall and Sims went with Boyd and Oswald, but not Leavelle in his Easter suit.

So, how was Oswald transferred to the custody of Leavelle and Graves from Boyd, Sims, and Hall? Where and when did it happen? 

I don't think it happened on the 3rd floor, not with all those reporters there. Leavelle and Graves (and Fritz) must have gone up to the 4th floor, shortly after this, and that is where it happened. 

And, I just realized something. Elmer Boyd said that he learned of the Oswald shooting while eating brunch with his wife and her parents at their home, that he saw it on live television. But, you, me, and the lamppost know that he was lying through his teeth, because he was there all morning. You're looking at him right here. 
What a liar! 

I am pretty sure Boyd is still alive. I can't find an obituary for him, and I guarantee you he is a guy who would have a published obituary. 

And you know that that same team of Boyd, Sims, and Hall became Bookhout's handlers. They were waiting in the jail office to swift Bookhout away after the spectacle. Here they are with Bookhout a few minutes later, back up on the 3rd floor. 


OK, now I know exactly what we are looking at in the video. They exited the Homicide Bureau and walked down the corridor to the lobby of the jail elevator. Look at this diagram:

Note that there was a main elevator but also a jail elevator, and that's what they used: the jail elevator. So, they came from the Homicide Bureau, which had Fritz' office where Oswald was interrogated; they turned left and walked a short ways down the corridor, then turned left into the lobby of the jail elevator to get to the jail elevator. 

Here is the first glimpse we get of Oswald coming out of the Homicide Bureau. He is about to pop out there. 


He then turns left, walks down the corridor, then turns left again thru a door. It's a perfect match to this: his movement went from right to left. 

So, they didn't use the main elevator; they used the jail elevator. And they took him upstairs, not downstairs. But, they could not have taken him to the 5th floor because Ruby was there, or soon to be there. So, they took him to the 4th floor. Not long after that, Fritz, Leavelle, and Graves came and took possession of Oswald from Boyd, Sims, and Hall. And they descended that same jail elevator to the basement level jail office. 

But wait. They still had to take those iconic photos using the real Oswald. So, Oswald was taken upstairs to change and then down to the garage, which was closed off to reporters and everyone else at the time. He was taken there for the photo-shoot.  



Now, just reason with me for a moment. Directly above is the Jackson photo, which was reportedly taken after the shot. It's pretty ridiculous that, after a gun blast, Detective Lowery (to the left of Leavelle and close to the wall) is still clasping his hands. Why isn't he reacting? Because there was no gun blast. It was just a staged photo. If there was a real gun blast, then the men in the picture would be displaying a "startle reaction". That's where you clinch your neck and raise your shoulders. 

Here's the Reagan shooting a split-second before.


And then after:

You hear the shot, and it startles you. You react, and it's a reflex. But, Lowery didn't react. He looks perfectly relaxed.  None of them in the Jackson photo reacted. None of them are flinching. Not even Fritz. He has his hand out, but he's not flinching his neck and shoulders, and that's what I'm talking about. 


Here's a guy demonstrating the Colt 38 Special outdoors, in an open area, and notice that he has an ear plug. That's because it's so loud.  

And, if you listen to it, you really get a sense of how loud it is.

Imagine if it was shot in a cramped cubby hole, and where no one expected it, how startling and jarring it would be.  


So, how can that be a real shooting? No one is startled. No one is having a visceral reaction to the blast. There was no blast. It's just a staged photo.

But, getting back to this:


They were taking Oswald back upstairs after the final interrogation. He isn't dressed yet, so the photos had to follow this. After the photos, they skirted Oswald away to wherever they skirted him. I assume they quickly sedated him. Maybe someone thrust a hypodermic needle, with a sedative, in his arm or thigh. And then they got things ready for the televised spectacle in the garage using the Oswald double. They put Roy Vaughn in place. Jack Ruby was already upstairs on the 5th floor. Ruby never got past Vaughn. 

I'll end with this new collage:

So, that's the same day, the same morning, about an hour apart. Look how gaunt the real Oswald was on the left. It's not him on the right.  


Tuesday, November 27, 2018

Apparently, it isn't as hard as some people think to come up with a body double. We know that Saddam Hussein had several body doubles who would make appearances for him. And, there are people today who say that the Saddam Hussein they tried and convicted and sentenced to death in Iraq was a double. And if he was a double, I presume he wasn't really put to death. 

This is from David Icke, who claims that the Saddam they tried was not the real Saddam Hussein.



So, on the right are presumably images of the real Hussein, and on the left is the impostor who was tried. Note his teeth, because the real Saddam had practically a Colgate smile.   

It struck me immediately upon seeing him that he was a different man. But regardless, it is absolutely certain that Hussein had body doubles who passed for him for years.

Many people believe that Hillary Clinton had a body double during the 2016 campaign, that she got very sick at a 9/11 event and had to be swifted away to Chelsea's apartment, and then shortly afterwards, she appeared in front of the building, fresh, lively and frolicking with a child. 

There are lots of videos about it on Youtube.  Here's one by a doctor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2msd66BABFs&t=960s

And there are also a ton of debunking articles about it, that mock the "conspiracy theorists" who believe it.   

I'm not saying it's true, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's true. And I am not putting up any pictures of her either. Too many people who have crossed the Clintons have shuffled off this mortal coil, if you catch my drift. And frankly, it was during the 2016 U.S. Presidential race, the most grueling race in the world. And she was running against Donald Trump, seen as a peril to the nation by many. So, if the idea surfaced to have a double for her, to cover for her on her bad days, and to relieve her of some of the hand-waving and baby kissing, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised. 

I'm just pointing out how possible it is, so that when I discuss an Oswald double being used that third weekend of November 1963, it isn't summarily dismissed.  

It is widely known that Joseph Stalin, who may have killed more people than anyone else who ever lived, used body doubles.


The double is on the left. His real name was Felix Dadaev.  The real Stalin is on the right. 

Another example is Osama bin laden. I don't know if he used them, himself. Maybe he did.  But the CIA has definitely used doubles of him. Here is Osama bin laden in 2001.


And here is an image of him that was released at the time of his "assassination" in 2011.
You would have to have just fallen off the turnip truck if you believe that a man who had kidney failure and was on dialysis could emerge 10 years later looking like that: markedly younger, healthier and stockier. I'm pretty sure aging just goes in one direction, and kidney failure only speeds up the process. 

Hitler had a body double. His name was Gustav Waler. It's Waler on the right below and Hitler on the left.  



There are rumors that Winston Churchill had a body double, but I haven't found any images. 

A Mexican politician, Renato Gomez, publicly sought some body doubles. 




So, if you believe as I do that Oswald was framed and innocent, and that the plan to use him that way was set up long in advance, then it's hardly surprising that they could come up with a double this good.


Yes, they look alike, but it isn't that hard to see that they are different men. 

Monday, November 26, 2018

Don Mitchell: 
In Afghanistan for example, JSOC/JTAC, along with CIA's "SAD," or "Special Activities Division," are running the entire show! First time since the Bay of Pigs, that CIA has run a theatre of operation...on their own and independent of the Military!
The largest CIA Station (ever since Laos) is in Afghanistan! where as: in Iraq, the Defense and State Department are running the show.
But what happens when America leaves? How much longer can America sustain the war effort independent of her allies...at 70 cents on the tax dollar going to the war effort?
The answer: Not much longer.

LikeShow more reactions
Comment
Comments

Ralph Cinque After 17 years of war, the Taliban controls as much of Afghanistan today as before the war started. We have NO CHANCE of beating them militarily, and isn't it obvious? So, how about we just get out, as we did in Vietnam? We killed 3 million Southeast Asians first, but then we left. You want to wait until we've killed 3 million Afghans? We've already killed hundreds of thousands. Isn't that enough?
Manage


Reply1mEdited