On the right, I have restored Oswald's shoulder to what it must have looked like before they altered the Altgens photo. But, I'm not saying that's how the photo looked. It's how Oswald looked because he did have a left shoulder, but the man behind him wasn't there at all. They put him in there to cover up the unique construction of Oswald's Russian shirt.

And don't you find it strange that nobody ever asked who that weird guy next to Doorman was? Nobody even acknowledged his presence there. They just ignored him, even though he is in an impossible arrangement with Doorman. Their union is an absolutely freaky abomination.
We have an opportunity now because Trump is going to be President, and he so independent, that he could overturn the official JFK story. And RFK Jr. will be a member of his Cabinet, and he's been saying, for decades, that "rogue CIA" killed his uncle. So, he's got Trump's ear. And he helped Trump get elected, so Trump owes him.
And, Trump was the leader of the Birher movement, as well as the Stolen Election movement. And when he was in France, he challenged the official dogma of World War 1 He refused to visit the American military cemetery and questioned whether we were the good guys in that war. If he's capable of doing that, he's capable of questioning the JFK story, as well. And I'm sure he wouldn't be afraid to do it.
The freaky alteratons that were made to the Altgens photo are a smoking gun. And no, it did not go out at 1:00. The photo of Clint Hill riding on the back of the limo, with Jackie sprawled on tthe trunk, which is Altgen7, got published in dozens of newspapers on November 22, and I am referring to ones that did not publish Altgens6. So, if all those papers got 6 and 7 at the same time, why would they just publish 7? If they were going to publish just one, I should think it would have been 6. But, they didn't have 6.
Altgens6 was first shown to the public by Walter Cronkite at 5:30 Central. Now, if CBS had it at 1:00, why didn't they show it sooner? They cancelled their regular programming and were covering the assassination all afternoon. So, why not show it right away, if they had it at 1:00 and then have Cronkite show it again on the Evening News? That wouldn't have hurt anything.
But, in regard to the impossible configuration of Doorman and Black Tie Man in Altgens6, if anyone wants to defend it, the only way to do so is to take a camera out and reproduce it. If you think it's legit, you have only one recourse: to reproduce it.

 I am showing you now the different ways they coped with the presence of Oswald in the doorway. And I want you to start with the image in the lower left, which is from Wiegman. Start there because it was a straight-on shot with no parallax. You can see that Doorman (who was Oswald) is standing in the center of the doorway, and the black man, Carl Jones, is standing at the bottom, at the extreme west side of the doorway, right next to the column. There was no side handrail there at the time. There is today, but there wasn't then. I put a white line between them to show that they weren't close together.

Now look above that at Altgens. In Altgens, there was a lot of parallax because Altgens shot it at an extreme angle. He was way down on Elm Street. And the effect of the parallax was to cut out of view most of the west side of the doorway. Even Doorman's right shoulder was cut off, even though he was standing in the center of the doorway, just as in Wiegman. They were taken at the same time. There is no basis to assume that Doorman moved.

And, there is no basis to assume that Carl Jones moved or changed his position. In Altgens, he appears to be looking east, while in Wiegman, he's looking where you expect him to look, which is west. That's because the limo went that way. Then, there were sounds, and the limo stopped, and apparently, people were concerned that something was wrong; something had happened. So, why would he be looking east at a time like that?

He wasn't looking east. That is a phony image of Carl Jones in the Altgens photo, taken by Congressman Phil Willis at 3 pm. I inserted the image from Willis, and you can see that it's the same image. That is the exact same face. And there's no way that Altgens and Willis caught Jones the exact same way because they were shooting from opposite poles of Dealey Plaza. The reason the two images of the black man look exactly the same is because they are the same image. They moved Willis' image into the Altgens photo.

Why? It's because the bottom of Oswald's shirt was tattered and torn, and if they had let that show, it would have given away that it was him.

And notice that there is Jones' face in profile, then the cuff of Oswald's shirt beneath it, and then this white shamrock below that. So, what the hell is that shamrock? Well, that is supposed to be Jones' body. How could a shamrock pass for a body? It could because in the context of the whole photo, it's so small that nobody is going to notice. Carl Jones may have been completely out of view to Altgens.

Then, there is Towner, which is upper right. There, they just blackened out the doorway but added a few unrecognizable contrasts. I don't know what those weird streaks are supposed to be, but for all practical purposes, they are nothing. Don't even try to decipher it because it's just art.

Finally, there is Hughes in the lower right, and that is a whole can of worms in itself. At the beginning, I said that Doorman (Oswald) was standing in the center of the doorway. And again, this is the same time. It is all the same time. So, why in Hughes is Doorman hovering right above the black guy? It's because they put him there, and if you watch the Hughes film, you'll see that he's a very unstable image. He fades in and out. Sometimes he has a head, and sometimes he doesn't. The technology then was very crude.

And then, there is Toni Glover and her mother standing on the pedestal. Do you know what they're doing there? They are covering up Oswald. Because remember: Doorman was in the center, just as we see him in Wiegman, and he didn't move. So besides using a phony Doorman to put over Jones, they put a phony Toni Glover and her mother on the pedestal to cover up Oswald.

In the Dorman film, it shows Toni and her mother as the limo is approaching the intersection, and they are not on the pedestal. They're just standing on the grass in front of the reflection pool. I have stood on the pedestal, and it is elevated. It's unnerving to stand on it. As you're standing on it, you're looking down to make sure you're far rom the edge, and you're thinking about your balance. And you're not moving around. All that hoopla that you see Toni and her mother doing in Dorman, that was done from the ground. And you notice that they don't look like they're any taller than anyone else. But, on the left, in the Hughes film, look how high they are. They are towering. They may have had less oxygen way up there.

So, do you really think that frumpy, middle-aged woman climbed on top of that pedestal? And look at the order. The mother, who was taller was in front, and 13 year old Toni was behind her. What could she possibly see? She couldn't see through her mother. If they were going to do that, don't you think the mother would have had Toni stand in front, and gotten behind her, so that they both could see? It's fake. It's a shield to cover up Oswald in the doorway.

And finally, upper right, it's the Bell film, where I believe they did some foliage enhancement to hide the doorway. On the left of it, you see the tree as it appears in Hughes, and on the right, there is the effusion of green in Bell, right in front of the doorway.

These were different solutions for the same problem, which was how to cover up Oswald in the doorway, and it is staggering.

So, I no longer assume that Black Hole Man was visoring his eyes because he would have made his hand like a visor to do that. So, is he supposed to be resting his hands on top of his head? Why would he be doing that? -and especially when JFK was passing by.

The closest thing I could find is this black man in this collage. Not saying he's exactly the same, but he's close.

But, we have another image of Black Hole Man, from the Wiegman film. And it's a joke. He doesn't even look photographic. He looks like a cartoon. He looks like art; very crappy art. I would think the CIA could have gotten better artists. There is absolutely nothing real about that image. They were just trying to approximate what they did with the Altgens photo.

And the Altgens photo corresponds very close in time to the beginning of the Wiegman film, where the press car is rounding the corner from Houston to Elm. They are within 2 seconds, for sure.

Obviously, the Wiegman guy is just a crude rendering by someone who wasn't trying too hard. He doesn't look remotely like the guy in Altgens, nor does he look the least bit real.

Look: the U.S. Government killed Kennedy. It wasn't Oswald. It wasn't the Mafia. They may have provided a shooter or two, but it was an operation of the CIA, the FBI, and the Vice President. And that means it was the U.S. Government that did it. And the second Kennedy died, LBJ became President. and instantly, the entire U.S. government got behind the official story.

And the U.S. Media got behind it even before that. And that's because the CIA and the FBI controlled the Media. They had their people installed in all the major media outlets, including the print media and television.

But, you're seeing now how crude and shabby the photographic fixing was. If I were them, I would be embarrassed.

And they're not going to get away with it. It's all going to come to light.

 This is one of the best analytic works I've ever seen in JFK assassination research. The researcher goes by Saintly Oswald. I don't know his real name. But, in this video he reveals the involvement of several Dallas motorcycle cops who were in on the assassination: Two, in particular are HB McClain and James H Taylor.

HB McClain was supposed to be the motorcycle cop riding opposite of Marrion Baker. And Saintly Oswald agrees with me that Baker was clean. He was NOT in on it.

In the official record, HB McClain was riding opposite Baker. But, Baker

said no, that it was JW Williams. And as Saintly Oswald rightly pointed out, Baker would surely knew who it was.

In the Darnell clip, which we have been discussing lately, everyone, including me, has assumed that the running motorcycle cop was Marrion Baker. Saintly Oswald says no, that it was HB McClain. His conclusion is based on the location of the guy's parked motorcycle. We have a photograph in which Baker marked where he parked his bike. It was on the island between Elm Street and the Elm Street Utility Rd and east of the traffic light. Well, the motorcycle in the Darnell clip and the Couch film (which shows it better) is west and south of that, and remember that Elm Street curves. Saintly Oswald also claims that the running cop doesn't climb the steps; he runs past them. And of course, Baker did climb the steps.

Then, Saintly Oswald asserts that the Darnell clip did originally show Baker pulling up and stopping where he said he did. And since the clip already shows "Baker" running to the steps, that had to be eliminated. So, they did it by putting this man in a suit over it. And he's right that the resolution and lighting of that man is way off from everything else in the scene. I am posting it here.

Now, one thing that I have said that Saintly Oswald missed, is that the people on the steps, are bogus, that it's just crappy art. IT IS NOT PHOTOGRAPHY. And I have circled it.

So, it's the guy in the lower right, whose resolution is much better than anyone else, he was put into the film. And you see him walking along for a second or so, taking the place of Baker's motorcycle. Now, the other motorcycle cop that Saintly Oswald exposes is James H Taylor. He is in the famous color photo of Oswald under arrest in front of the Texas Theater, where Paul Bentley was smoking his celebratory cigar. Standing in back is a motorcycle cop in a leather jacket, and that's Taylor. However, there is no insignia on the helmet. It's just a plain white helmet. And he's not in uniform. So, how could he be a cop? But, he was a cop,. He was James H Taylor. And you see him later in the same outfit, except his helmet does have a police insignia.

So, Saintly Oswald thinks that Taylor entered the theater as a civilian but came out a cop. And the hijinks that were followed, up to Taylor's death decades later, are phenomenal. They flipped his image in his obituary so that you wouldn't recognize him. Then, near the end, you learn that like John Armstrong, Saintly Oswald thinks that Captain Westbrook was involved in the Tippit shooting. And there's a film in which Taylor and Westbrook are together, and you see Taylor putting a gun in Westbrook's car, which Saintly Oswald thinks was Tippit's gun. So, was Taylor involved in the Tippit shooting?

This is brilliant research and analysis. I commend Saintly Oswald, whoever he is. It's over an hour, but it is well worth watching.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8PiiSH7fQA

 This is strange. The order of the tramps got changed. The guy who was in second place took the lead. What, were they racing? Who would do such a thing? And why? Why wasn't he content to be in second place? Was it just his competitive nature? And how strange it must have been for the first tramp to see the second tramp overtake him.

But, that's not the only thing that got changed. The order of the two cops got reversed too. The cop who was way in back in the version on the left is in the lead in the version on the right. At first, all I noticed was that they were different men. One had two emblems above his shirt collar, while the other just had one. And one had a long, horse-like face and flabby neck, while the other guy was younger and had a rounder face. I put their faces side by side.

But then, it occurred to me that they just swapped places. The guy leading in the second photo is way in back in the first photo.

But, how and why did this happen? What could possess someone to do it? And how did he bring it about? Did he start race-walking? Running? And what did he tell the other cop? That it was his turn to be in front?

You can't rationalize any of this. I'm a scriptwriter, so I'm used to story-telling, but this story is just too whacky. It's beyond credulity.

So, what shall we make of it? What I make of it is that these were staged photos. Maybe they went out at 2:00 to reshoot the photos, so if anyone noticed Oswald in the doorway of the first one, they could say, "No, it's can't be him because it was 2:00." Nice try.

 This is the Bagman putting something over the head of James  Bookhout during the phony melee' after his hat fell off. 

 If you look closely at the man in the Three Tramps photo on the left, you can make out Oswald's wrist band that he wore. I put an arrow to it. That's him: Lee Harvey Oswald. So, that photo was taken when Oswald was still there. I'm sure it was right before he left. So, figure 12:34.

Now, I am not making any claims for the other 6 Three Tramps photos, as to when they were taken. I'm just say that this one was taken at 12:34, and Lee Harvey Oswald is in it.

 This is another comparison of Oswald to the man in the doorway talking to the cop, and it is striking. It is obviously the same man. That much likeness says that it is. And if anyone is going to dispute this, there is only one way that they can, and that is to identify the man. If he was some other TSBD employee, then who? And if you don't have anyone, then you need to shut up because it defaults to Oswald. Unless you have someone better you can put forward, with images, it's Oswald.

And that means that the photo must have been taken when Oswald was still there.

When you have this image comparison in one hand, and the claim that the photo wasn't taken until 1:30 in the other hand, I hope you know which hand to drop. I hope you know what trumps what.

Since it appears to be Oswald, and without any other prospects, it means that the photo had to have been taken prior to 12:35.

It's a pity there are people who don't have the intelligence to follow that logic, but that's their problem, not mine.

This is Oswald talking to a cop in the doorway right before he left for home.

 I did a podcast with Dr. Kevin Barrett recently about my upcoming film DOVEY'S PROMISE. It is a courtroom drama about the Towpath Murder Trial of 1965, in which the victim was Mary Pinchot Meyer, who was the last mistress of JFK. The defendant was a poor, hapless black man, Raymond Crump, and famed Civil Rights attorney Dovey Roundtree was so convinced of his innocence that she offered to defend him for one dollar. 

Of course, we talked about the film, but I'd say we talked more about the history, including the relationship between JFK and Mary, and why there was really nothing plausible about the case against Crump, that you really can't conjure up a motive for Crump. Neither robbery nor rape make sense in the context of what happened, and I get into it in the podcast. 

So, here is the link, and I'm sure you'll find it interesting. 

https://rumble.com/v5rmc7w-ralph-cinque-on-doveys-promise-jfk-assassination-related-feature-film.html?fbclid=IwY2xjawGw4LVleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHc8OSwEgoeJ4eFWMG6jlVjM0mVUno4ZJuT52HepxlL0wRq-OI-Ep1Q_7iw_aem_mZdpSF2g1ejRbEHUoCrwFg

 

 

You have to know how to think to do this; and sadly, most people don't know how. It's like a game of rock-paper-scissors. Most people know that rock beats scissors, and paper beats rock, and scissors beat paper, and they know the basis for each of these "trumps."

Well, the same mental process applies here. If the photo shows that it's Oswald standing there, but there is also the claim that it wasn't taken until 1:30 or later, then it's the time claim that must be wrong. The claim that it's Oswald can't be wrong because the likeness is too great. And the guy must have worked there because there is no other reason why he would be up there. And all the people who worked there were known. It's not as though there was another employee who looked and dressed like Oswald. And there is no chance that that guy is Lovelady. And Lovelady didn't look and dress like Oswald anyway.

Are you aware that the public didn't become aware of the Three Trumps until several years later? The Morning News, the Times Herald, and the Star-Telegram all took photos of the Three Tramps, seven in total, but they didn't publish them. It wasn't until January 31, 1968 that Richard E. Sprague appeared on the Tonight Show and showed them to the public. If it weren't for Sprague, we wouldn't know about the Three Tramps at all.

I've done quite a few comparisons of the Oswald figure in the photo to other images of Oswald, such as this one, and it is certain that it's him. And therefore, the photo must have been taken right when Oswald was leaving the building at approximately 12:34. Rock breaks scissors.

Dennis Cimino:

The "another employee that looked like Oswald" is both 'preposterous' and 'lame' being that we effectively know who all of the employee's at T.S.B.D. were on that date in 1963, and there was only ONE person who looked like Oswald.

And that was Oswald.

There was no 'look alike' and to be blunt about it, asserting Lovelady looked like Oswald is like saying that Michelin Man looked like 'Twiggy' and could pass as her 'double' then. :)

the other thing that is obvious is that every minute that Oswald stayed on that doorstep talking to the Inspector, further meant that he hadn't shot anyone because a man who just committed CAPITOL MURDER of a PRESIDENT is not going to arbitrarily go have a chat session with a POLICEMAN who'd smell CORDITE ON HIM

had he fired a rifle of WW-II vintage such as the Carcano was.

There has probably not been one single MURDER in the history of the world where the 'shooter' hung around to talk to POLICE after killing a public figure.  If you can cite that, I'd love to see it.

No killer hangs out to chat with POLICE.  None.  Zero. Every second Oswald hung out there at T.S.B.D. made him more innocent of a capitol crime of MURDER by virtue of the fact that he clearly had no reason to flee a crime scene which didn't involve him as a PERPETRATOR OF ANY CRIME.

 There is no doubt that Lee Harvey Oswald is in one of the Three Tramps photos talking to a police officer in the doorway. I suspect that officer was Police Inspector J. Herbert Sawyer. That's him on the left standing in the exact same spot and very close to the same time. Notice his distinctive white hat in both pictures. It would be a strange coincidence if that was someone else. It would be like Sawyer had a twin. 

And for the people who dispute that it's Oswald, just remember that it definitely isn't Lovelady. So, if it that's not Oswald, then it means there was another employee, besides Lovelady, who happened to look and dress like Oswald. (not that Lovelady looked and dressed like Oswald; he didn't; but that is their story)

Sawyer did testify to the Warren Commission, and of course, he didn't say anything about having interacted with Oswald. But, he did admit to spending a lot of time at the TSBD, including in the doorway. 

So, let's consider the story of that picture. It's clear to me that Oswald started the conversation. I say that because he is facing Sawyer and looking at him.  Sawyer is not facing Oswald, and he isn't looking at him either. At that instant, he appears to be looking down. These things tell me that Oswald was the instigator. He went to talk to Sawyer; not vice versa. 

So, what could Oswald have had to say to Sawyer? Obviously, I can only speculate. But, this was about 4 minutes after the shooting, as Oswald was going home. So, I think it's reasonable to suggest that Oswald was asking Sawyer if it was OK if he went home because there wasn't going to be any resumption of work that day. And if that's what he asked, then Sawyer must have given him the go-ahead, since we know that Oswald left.  Obviously, Sawyer didn't stop him. 

But, why would he give him the go-ahead to leave when the police were determined to question every employee about what they saw and heard? Then, they took most of them to City Hall to get their statements in writing. Sawyer must have anticipated that, so why would he tell Oswald he could go home?

Well, let's remember: they wanted Oswald to leave. They did NOT want to arrest him at the TSBD. The plan was to get him armed, so that hopefully, he would die in a shootout with the police. 

And the proof is that Roy Truly, upon seeing Oswald in the 2nd floor lunch room, brushed him off to Baker. He assured Baker that Oswald worked for him. And he must have said it in a way that communicated that there was no chance that Oswald could be the shooter. Because think about it: just because Oswald worked for him didn't mean he couldn't be the shooter. So, Truly must have given Baker a vibe that Oswald was harmless. 

But then, shortly afterwards, a roll-call was taken, that Oswald wasn't present for. Truly's response to that was to inform the police, and obviously, his vibe must have been very different: that they need to find Oswald.  Charles Givens also wasn't present; he had left. Yet, Truly didn't raise any concerns about him. Just Oswald. 

Make no mistake: Truly was in on it. The TSBD was a CIA front company. Truly was in on the operation to kill Kennedy and frame Oswald. Of that, I am certain. And I suspect that Sawyer was also in on it. And I say that because he let Oswald leave.

And it doesn't even matter what Oswald approached him about. No matter what it was, Sawyer let Oswald leave when he shouldn't  have. Look at this from his testimony:

Mr. BELIN. Was that before or after you told the men there to guard the front door and not let anyone in or out?
Mr. SAWYER. That was after.

So now, we know for sure that Sawyer had the mindset not to let anyone in or out. So, if he had that mindset, why did he let Oswald out? 

And we know what happened next: Oswald walked  a few blocks and then boarded the bus. Then, he got off right away and made his way to the Greyhound bus terminal.  But, after Oswald got off McWatters' bus, the police soon got on it. So, what does that tell you? It tells you that they were following him. Stuart L. Reed even photographed the bus while Oswald was on it. 

But, the most important thing about this photo is something Dennis Cimino said: that it is very exonerating of Oswald because a murderer wouldn't want to talk to the police. A murderer would just want to get out of there. So, it goes to show that Oswald had no guilt. He hadn't done anything, so he had nothing to feel guilty about. Hence, he was not afraid to talk to the police.   

 I have made a big discovery tonight, and I hope you'll share it. It clears everything up about the Prayer Man clip, and it proves that Prayer Man was NOT Oswald.

All along, I have had doubts about the authenticity of the Prayer Man clip. They said it was from the Darnell film, but we don't see it in that film. We only see it as a separate clip.

Look at this frame. There is an arrow pointing to Baker, whom we saw running to the steps. And he's running fast. And, there is an arrow pointing to Prayer Man at the top of the steps, who never moves at all.

The clip ends very soon after this, but from watching it, we have to assume that Baker flew up the stairs. Roy Truly said that Baker pushed people out of the way. We don't see Truly here, and why not? I'll tell you in a moment.

So, if Prayer Man wasn't going anywhere (and we have to assume that from how this unfolds) and he was Oswald, then it would mean that Baker passed Oswald in the doorway as he ran up the steps,. Then, wouldn't he remember him if he saw him little more than a minute later on the 2nd floor? Remember: Baker was a cop, and cops are trained to be observant.

And keep something in mind that is very important: Oswald got to the 2nd floor lunch room BEFORE Baker. Baker was in the stairwell while Oswald was already in the vestibule of the lunch room. Baker saw him through the glass in the door, just as Oswald was about to enter the lunch room proper. Then, Baker followed him in there, and once he got in there, he was facing the opening to the lunch room, and he saw Oswald again. He said Oswald had gone about 20 feet into the lunch room by the time he saw him again.

So, how could Oswald beat Baker to the lunch room if Prayer Man was Oswald? Baker was a cop on an urgent mission, and Prayer Man is just standing there doing nothing. He's like a lump on a log. We can't assume that Prayer Man went anywhere prior to Baker going inside. So, Baker had a head-start, and he was the one in an urgent state of mind and the drive of a cop.

Obviously, you can't claim that Prayer Man followed Baker. That doesn't work. So, if you're going to claim that he's Oswald, you have to say that he went a different way, which means that he used the stairs in the southeast corner and then walked across the great expanse of the second floor office area to get to the lunch room in the northwest corner of the building. But, even if you suggest that he did that, he was not going to be rushing the way Baker was. Baker was looking for a killer. So, how could Prayer Man have gotten to the lunch room ahead of Baker? He couldn't.

Now, I'm going to tell you something that I just figured out tonight, just in time for 61st anniversary. As I said, I have long doubted that the Prayer Man clip was from Darnell because we don't see it in the Darnell film. But, I've had an epiphany tonight: The reason we don't see the Prayer Man clip in the Darnell film is because they removed it before they released it. Why? BECAUSE THEY DID NOT WANT TO SHOW THAT DOORWAY. Why didn't they want to show the doorway? It was because Doorman was gone. Oswald had left. And he did use those stairs in the southeast corner and walk across the second floor. He was already on his way to the lunch room, and that's why he beat Baker there. So, they didn't want to show the doorway without a Doorman. And they also didn't want to show the other people who were there, and that's because they knew there were other images of the doorway, which had been altered, such as Altgens and Wiegman, and they couldn't show the Darnell doorway since it would contradict those other images of the doorway. There was enough disparity already. Could anyone say that the Altgens doorway looks like the Wiegman doorway? No!

So, they just cut it out of the Darnell film. It was the quickest and easiest solution. And by the way, the Couch film shows Baker on his run to the doorway in a very similar manner, and it's not surprising because Couch and Darnell were on the same press car. I just found that out tonight.

So, at the time, they didn't know what to do with this clip of the Darnell doorway. And it was a redundant problem that called for different solutions. In the Towner film, when the camera passed the doorway, they just blackened the whole doorway. In the Hughes film, they put that 13 year old girl up on the pedestal and blew her up big, so that she obscured the doorway. Yes, that was fake too. But, in this case, they just took it out and put it aside. They didn't throw it away. And as time passed, they got to work cleansing that Darnell doorway. They got artists to just replace the images of the people who were there with crude, cartoonish, unrecognizable ones that don't even look photographic. And you can see it in this frame. That jumble on the right side is not photographic. It is art; crappy art. The guy at the top of the steps in the white shirt isn't real. I'm telling you, as a doctor, as a chiropractor, that he is not a human being. Do you see the way he is leaning? No human being could be configured like that. And Prayer Man isn't real either.

So, what I'm saying now is that, yes, the Prayer Man clip really WAS from the Darnell film, but Prayer Man wasn't it. He is fictional. And the reason we don't see Roy Truly, who should be there, is because he got thrown out with the bath water too.

It's very unfortunate that Oliver Stone put the Prayer Man clip in JFK. He got bamboozled. And Stone also depicted Oswald eating in the 2nd floor lunch room during the motorcade. That was false too. Oswald said he ate in the 1st floor lunch room, and Fritz, Hosty, and Bookhout all wrote it down. We have it writing 3 times! Why would Oswald lie about where he ate lunch? And if you realize, as I do, that he was innocent, why would he lie about anything?

So, the eerie and ironic fact is that Prayer Man was added to the clip not to represent Oswald, but to represent Lovelady. In other words, Prayer Man is supposed to be Doorman, and in there concocted story, Doorman was Lovelady. But, the fact is that PRAYER MAN WAS NOBODY. He is fictional. It was all damage control. And unfortunately, Oliver Stone fell for it.

Oswald was the Altgens Doorman. There is no doubt about it. It's his gaunt face, his slender body, his stance (clasping his hands in front of his body, left over right) his stretched, deformed t-shirt, his tattered, long-sleeved Russian shirt. We can match all that.

And the bogus Prayer Man claim has been a deliberate attempt to mislead and muddy the waters with a false narrative.

As I said, this is big find, and you should share it because Prayer Man died tonight.

 In 3 days, it will be the 61st anniversary of JFK's murder. The most important thing to realize about it is that Oswald didn't do it, and he was standing in the doorway of the Book Depository at the time.

To the people who admit that Oswald didn't do it, but who won't admit that he was in the doorway at the time, they need to realize that there's no place else he could have been. If he wasn't on the 6th floor shooting at Kennedy, then he HAD to be in the doorway.

He wasn't in the 2nd floor lunch at the time. He told the police that he ate his lunch in the 1st lunch room early in the lunch break. And they wrote it down. Fritz, Bookhout, and Hosty all wrote it down. Here is Hosty's note about it. It says that he ate lunch in the 1st floor lunch room and then went outside to watch the P. Parade,. "P" was short for Presidential.

The note says that he went to the 2nd floor to get a Coke to eat with his lunch, and then he returned to the 1st floor to eat it. And then he went outside to watch. Now, Baker and Truly both said that he had no Coke when they saw him after the shooting. But, Mrs. Reid said that when she returned to her desk on the 2nd floor after the shooting that she saw Oswald with a Coke as he was passing through, presumably on his way down, the same way he came up, using the stairs in the southeast corner of the building, next to the doorway. So, if he got a Coke between when he was with Baker and Truly and when he was with Mrs. Reid, was that his second Coke? Did he have one with lunch and then get another one? I don't know. It's certainly possible.

But, it's relatively unimportant. The important thing is that he ate in the 1st floor lunch room, and then he went outside to watch the Presidential Parade.

And Oswald said that while he was eating in the 1st floor lunch room, that Jarman and Norman were hanging around. He didn't say he ate with them. He didn't eat with anybody. He was a loner at the TSBD. He just wasn't interested in making friends with anyone. He just cited that they were around at the time, and they confirmed it.

So, there is NO CHANCE that Oswald ate in the 2nd floor lunch room.

And realize also that according to Officer Marrion Baker, Oswald was just arriving at the 2nd floor lunch room when he saw him. Well, if Oswald was just getting there at 12:31.5 then it means he wasn't there at 12:30. You can't assume that he was there and came back.

And there's no place else he could have been. He wasn't working. He wasn't on the phone. He wasn't writing a love letter to Judyth Baker or to his wife Marina, whichever you prefer.

Do you want to suggest he was in the bathroom relieving himself? Well, that doesn't take that long. And they deliberately released the workers 15 minutes earlier than usual at 11:45 precisely so that they could take care of their eating and drinking and ablutions and biological functions, so that they would be ready to watch the motorcade at 12:25. That was the expected time of arrival, not 12:30. it was 5 minutes late.

And Oswald said that he was "out with Bill Shelley in front." How could he even know that Shelley was there unless he was there himself?

So, if you call yourself an Oswald defender, you have to place him in the doorway. If you don't, you're a liar. If you don't, you are NOT an Oswald defender.

 The Gorilla Man clip was reenacted long after the assassination, perhaps 2 years later. Gorilla Man was not Lovelady, and Lovelady was not there at the time. Lovelady said that he left the entrance before Baker even reached the steps. In his WC testimony, he said that he had already walked  20 to 25 steps, and then turned around, and saw Baker and Truly climbing the steps in route to their fateful encounter with Oswald in the 2nd floor lunch room. So, Lovelady could not have been there 10 minutes after the shooting, when the Gorilla Man clip supposedly happened. 

 Billy Lovelady had protruding ears, which you can see in this photo by Mark Lane on the left. Of course, Oswald didn't have protruding ears, and neither did Doorman. Their ears look identical because they were the same man. But, Billy Lovelady was among the 3% who have protruding ears.

The FBI photos of Lovelady don't show it, but they were doctored. And they actually put the doctored right ear too low. I'll post it another time.

But, there is no doubt that Oswald was Doorman. Government and media have been lying about for 61 years to hide the fact that Oswald was innocent. But, he was.

The question of how Clint Hill was able to jump off the Queen Mary and then catch up to the Presidential limo has been in dispute. I maintain that the limo must have stopped or very nearly stopped. And of course, we don't see that in any film. 

The Secret Service admitted to slowing to 15 mph, but they never admitted going slower than that. But, if Clint Hill had jumped off a vehicle going 15 mph, he would have had to roll. That's because his direction in deboarding would not have been the same as the direction that his body was going from being on the moving car. So, as soon as he landed, his body would have kept going in the direction that it was going. And that would have caused him to tumble. 

And remember he was a Secret Service agent; not a circus stunt performer. 

And I'm not saying that he did tumble. Of course, he didn't. I'm saying that the cars had stopped or very nearly stopped. 

But, Stephen Smith claimed, in a comment to me, that both the Zapruder film and the Nix film show Hill jumping off the Queen Mary. 

They do not. The Zapruder film just shows him reaching the limo and climbing up it. And I should think that everyone should know that by now after all the times we've watched it. Here he is in frame 333 reaching it. By the time it gets to this, the Queen Mary is long out of view. 

We see him a couple frames before that, but that's it. We certainly don't see him jumping off the Queen Mary.

So, that statement of Stephen Smith was false. What about the Nix film? We don't see Hill jump off the Queen Mary there either. and what they did to introduce him was very tricky and sneaky. I'll go through it frame by frame.

So, that's frame 22, and I put MM to indicate Mary Moorman. Notice how non-photographic she looks. She looks like very crude art. And it gets worse from there.

So, this is frame 25, and now Mary looks practically headless. Maybe she is completely headless. Regardless, it is not a photographic image, even for the 1960s. 

In frame 27, for the first time, the head of Clint Hill peeks out. So, his head is at the same height as Mary's, but he is deep to her, and slightly in front of her. I put an arrow above the head of Clint Hill. Now, why would his head be as low as that? He was a very tall man, and she was a very short woman. Here is Clint Hill in the Willis image.

So, he was tall, and he was standing tall. So why again, would his head be at the same level as Mary Moorman's?

But continuing, he starts his trek. 

Now, he's putting some space between him and Mary, whom we can still see. But, he is still no higher than she is. And she was a very, very short woman. 

Now, in frame 37, I don't see Mary at all. I think she's gone for good. And I have circled him, as he makes his way towards the limo, apparently moving faster than the motorcycles as well.

This is frame 44, and he has reached the back of the limo.

In 52, he seems to be up on the limo. 

But then, in 58, he's back down on the ground. 

Then, jumping to 79, his right foot is still on the ground.

Finally, in 91, he's up for keeps. Notice that the limo has left the motorcycles behind. So, it sped up much more than they did. 

But, the point is that we certainly don't see Clint Hill deboarding the Queen Mary, as Stephen Smith claimed. And the weird blending of Clint Hill and Mary Moorman looks like chicanery to me. And if you watch it all at speed, then it really looks like the two of them are one, and he just grew out of her. To capture these frames, I had to slow the film down to 25% speed. It's a good thing we can do that on Youtube. 

But, watch it yourself, and be sure to watch the part on Houston Street first because the film looks photographic there. It's not until it gets to the Kill Zone that it looks like crappy art. There is a big qualitative difference between the two. And it was the same camera and the same film! There is no excuse for it. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toU8GSRnOQk

I tell you that at the speed that the limo appears to be going, there is no way that Clint Hill could have caught up with it. Maybe Usain Bolt in his prime could have caught up with it, but I doubt that Clint Hill could have. 

And at that speed, there is no way he could have deboarded the Queen Mary, and just instantly started running. I think it's very unlikely he could have even stayed on his feet. As soon as he planted his foot on the ground, his forward momentum would have caused him to fall.  He had no break. I and the Laws of Physics say he would have rolled.