There is solid evidence for a very shallow wound in JFK”s back that did not traverse him.  

But first, let’s name the autopsy doctors who said that the wound in JFK’s back was located at the level of T3. There was JFK’s own personal doctor, Dr. George Burkley. There was Dr. Boswell. There was Dr. Robert Canada. And then, there was Dr. Robert Karnei, who said that it was at the level of T4. I think there were more, but those come to mind.

Now, the spinous processes are the most logical landmark to use to locate the wound.  That’s because they were the nearest landmark to it, and they were also the most helpful and practical landmark. The vertical row of spinous processes is like a ruler in your back. And in the upper thoracic spine, ironically, the spinous processes are an inch apart. So, it’s truly like you have a ruler in your back. So, why would you use anything else?

But, Dr. Humes, in his autopsy report, did NOT locate the wound as per the spine. Instead, he said that the wound was located 14 centimeters from the mastoid process and also 14 centimeters from the acromion process of the scapula. But, to cite those references and ignore the spine? That's ridiculous. So, why did he do it?

I believe he did it because he must have known about all those doctors saying it was at the level of T3, and he didn’t want to openly contradict them.

Humes said that the back wound was slightly above the superior border of the scapula. The superior border of the scapula is usually in line with T2.  So, it appears that he was claiming that the back wound was at a level between T1 and T2.

But, he didn’t want to say that and openly contradict the others, so he said it in that other roundabout way.  

You should know that they spent a long time trying to probe the back wound. Dr. Karnei said, “we worked all night with the probes.” And they put JFK’s body in different positions trying to probe it. They even sat him upright trying to get a probe into that wound. But, it didn’t work. They always hit a wall.

As a result, Dr. Robert Canada said frankly in 1968 that “the bullet did not exit.”  Of course, there was no bullet in the wound or in JFK’s body, as proven by x-ray. And claiming that it fell out is stupid. How could it get through his clothes?  

It states in the autopsy that the only damage to JFK’s lungs was the mild contusion in the apex of his right lung. But, that was from the throat shot, not the back shot. 

So, let’s talk about the contusion. Dr. Perry saw it, and it’s why he asked for a suction tube.  He presumed it was associated with the throat shot. He never said he thought it was from something else. The trachea is located right in-between the two lung apices. So, the tracheal damage and the apical contusion- that was all one thing.   

I tell you that JFK was not hit in the throat with a bullet.  He couldn’t have been because if he had, the bullet would either have gone through him or been found. Dr. Perry did not find a bullet in him, and the Bethesda doctors x-rayed him and said there was no bullet.

JFK was hit with a flechette or dart, and the shot was taken from his right side and by Umbrella Man, just as Cutler and Sprague proposed.  It damaged some tracheal coils and caused the apical contusion. It’s ridiculous to think they had separate causes.   

The missile that entered his back did not enter the lungs; it only went through skin, fascia, and muscle. So, the apical contusion was definitely caused by the throat shot; not the back shot.

Dr. David Mantik told me in an email exchange that he did a detailed analysis and determined that if a bullet had traversed JFK, as per the official story, it definitely would have impacted the spinal cord. The effect of that would have been catastrophic. He would have been instantly paralyzed, but he wasn’t paralyzed at all.

But, even if it didn’t hit the spinal cord, it surely would have been close enough to it to affect the nerve roots, and that alone would have caused paralysis, at least temporarily. Here is the case of a 16 year old boy in Ukraine who was shot in the back of the neck. The bullet hit his cervical spine but not his spinal cord. It affected the nerve roots from C4 to C7 and then the bullet lodged in his skull behind the cheek bone. He suffered pain, shock, and paralysis. But, they got him in surgery right away and were able to remove the bullet, and he has been regaining some function, fortunately. Here is the abstract about it:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36928329/

So, in that case, there was no spinal cord damage, but there was paralysis from the nerve root damage. However, JFK incurred no paralysis at all. So, there is no way a bullet traversed his neck from back to front that close to the cord. 

And I’ll leave you with this: if the back shot didn’t even penetrate deep enough to enter JFK’s lung, how shallow was it? The lungs are, on average, 5.5 cm deep to the skin in the region of T1 to T3, which is about 2 inches. Since JFK’s lungs were not violated from that shot, it means that the depth of penetration had to be less than that. Surely a FMJ bullet that reached his skin travelling 2000 feet per second did not, and could not, stop in 2 inches. That means that it had to be something else that hit him. Ice is hard, but it is also unstable. It bursts easily, and it can be formulated to burst easily. Ice made from hard water is much more unstable than frozen distilled water. That’s because the minerals in the hard water interfere with the hydrogen bonding.

The bonds between hydrogen and oxygen in ice are different from the bonds in liquid water.  Liquid water has polar covalent bonds, in which hydrogen and oxygen share electrons. In ice, there are intermolecular bonds connecting separate molecules of H2O in an open crystal lattice. But, the presence of minerals interferes with those bonds, putting the whole lattice at risk.

The ice dart that hit JFK was designed to burst as soon as it pierced his skin. CIA Director William Colby said that, to the victim, it felt like nothing more than a mosquito bite. But, the bursting process would also act like an injection, to get the nerve agent into his system fast.

Until he was shot in the head, JFK’s physical trauma was relatively minor. He had a shallow wound in his back that was rather harmless.  And he had a puncture wound in his throat that damaged his trachea a little and caused a little contusion in the adjacent lung apex. That is not what caused his bizarre manifestations in the Zapruder film. Those bizarre effects- his dyskinesia, spasticity, and mental aberrations- were due to poisoning; not trauma.

 To all the people who think it's so comical to suggest that JFK was shot in the back with an ice dart that contained a nerve agent, there is the indisputable and undeniable fact that the CIA contracted to have a gun that could do that produced. And stockpiles of two nerve agents were found: shellfish nerve toxin and cobra venom nerve toxin.

So, the CIA weapon to do it definitely existed, and so did the stockpiles of nerve agents. This is Senator Church holding up the gun. It was all confirmed by then CIA Director William Colby.

And that is why this claim cannot be brushed off, and it is no laughing matter.

Dr. John Lattimer’s claim that JFK displayed a “Thorburn position” is totally wrong, and it showed flagrant ignorance for a medical doctor.  

I found the case that Lattimer based his claim on. It was in a British medical journal from 1898 in which a Dr. Thorburn wrote about a patient he had, a painter who fell off a ladder, slamming his neck into on a metal beam which crushed his spinal cord at the level of C6. All his bodily muscles were instantly and permanently paralyzed, except for the few that were innervated from above that level. There was nothing Dr. Thorburn could do for him. He just lay in his hospital bed for 18 days until he died. He couldn’t eat, but they brought a wet sponge to his mouth regularly to hydrate him. He was unconscious most of the time, and when he did come to, he was delirious.  But, as he lied there, the few muscles he had that still worked slowly shortened until they reached their shortest possible length.

You see, when one muscle contracts, it stretches its opposing muscle. So, if I contract my bicep, my tricep gets stretched, and vice versa. But, if only your bicep works, then it never gets stretched. So, if it shortens a little, say, because I twitch, it’s going to stay shortened.  That’s what happened to Thorburn’s patient. When you don’t have the opposing muscle, you can’t reverse whatever shortening takes place. That’s all it was, and it has no correlation to JFK, who had no spinal cord damage and no paralysis.

 On the left is a drawing of Thorburn’s patient from the journal. So, the muscle tone in his few remaining working muscles gradually shortened them to where he wound up in that position.

It wasn’t a reflex; it was just unopposed muscle tone run amuck.  It wasn’t a reflex for JFK either; it was a panic reaction. He raised his arms in a panic because he had a respiratory obstruction from the throat shot, and he was trying to deal with it.  His actions were voluntary and purposeful. With his left hand, he pulled on his tie to loosen it. With his right hand, he put it over his mouth and coughed- to dislodge the obstruction. And it worked. As soon as he did that, he could breathe OK.

But, his actions were more instinctual and visceral than cerebral. So, it wasn’t a reflex, but it was an instinctual survival response.  There's a difference.

So, what was the obstruction? I asked Dr. David Mantik, and he told me it may have been just a bolus of blood. It wasn’t a bullet because he didn’t cough up a bullet, and there was no bullet in his body.

But, the way Kennedy raised his hands was abnormal. Normally, you raise your hands by supinating your forearm, which is a counter-clockwise rotation which gets the palm of your hand facing you. You only need to lift your hand. You don’t lift your upper arm. So, you do that by turning your forearm and lifting your hand. But, Kennedy contracted his deltoids and thrust his elbows out like wings and lifted everything. So, why did he do it that way? He did it that way because of overexcitement of his nervous system due to the nerve agent. And then when he was finished, he couldn’t put his arms down because they were in spasm due to the nerve agent.  

 So, he just sat there, unable to put his arms down. Jackie tried to press on his arm to coax it down, and it came down a little, but not much. She mostly just tipped him. And his spasticity only spread. It kept getting worse and worse until the fatal head shot put an end to him. That shot essentially killed him instantly. At that point, he was like a chicken with its head cut off; still showing some signs of life but only because his body hadn’t completely shut down but was definitely going to.

JFK exhibited very aberrant behavior in the Zapruder film, both physically and mentally, and it can’t be explained by a shallow wound in his back, affecting no vital tissue, and a puncture wound in his throat that only damaged his trachea some, but did no damage to his brain or spinal cord. JFK’s weird showings in the Zapruder film were all due to poisoning; not to physical trauma. And there is no correlation between JFK and Thorburn’s patient; none whatsoever.

 Eric A. Meece falsely claimed that the imagery of JFK and Jackie in the Altgens photo corresponds to Z-250. It does not, and not even close, as I demonstrate in this collage.

And if there are any other takers, they are going to go down too because that phony imagery of JFK and Jackie in Altgens does not match any Zapruder frames. JFK was not shot in the throat yet at the time the Altgens photo was taken. The limo was still high on the hill. And Altgens himself told us that he took that picture just as he heard the very first shot, which was not the throat shot. The very first shot was the back shot, in which an ice dart struck him in the back with a toxic payload. And physically, it felt like no more than a prick. As CIA Director William Colby said, it felt more like a mosquito bite. And JFK rode down the hill that way, as the effects of that shot spread throughout his body, before he was shot in the throat.

And I know it sounds more like the storyline from a Mission Impossible movie, but, just get over that, would you? They were counting on nobody's mind going to this place because it seems too farfetched. But, it is what happened, and I would stake my life on it.

And here's another confirmation: If you watch Dan Rather's description of the Zapruder film on November 25, 1963, he said it shows JFK being shot in the back 30 yards from the intersection. And that was exactly right. "The first shot had hit!" That's what Rather said, and he was describing what I have been telling you.

 This collage clinches it that the imagery of JFK and Jackie in Altgens is bogus. First, look above at the photo from Main Street. It was taken very close to Houston, at the entrance to Dealey Plaza. Look at JFK in that top photo. Notice that he has a very square shoulder, and you can see the point of his shoulder. But, in Altgens he has no square shoulder. It's all one continuous slope, and it isn't real. You can't tell where his shoulder ends and where his arm going down begins.

Notice also that even in the Main Street photo, JFK's hands are raised some. They are not down by his side or in his lap. And you can practically see his elbow. You know exactly where it is, even though the view of it is obstructed by Connally's shoulder. And it would have to be in the same location in Altgens. So, what is Jackie grabbing in Altgens? It can't be his arm because his arm didn't extend out that far.

This proves that what we are seeing of them in Altgens is crappy art. They removed the imagery that was there and replaced it with that crappy art. JFK was NOT yet shot in the throat when the Altgens photo was taken.

 This is the Midnight Press Conference. It starts at 53 seconds. Please watch it. Even if you've watched it before, watch it again. It's only slightly over 1 minute long, so you might as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxvxgODFxEo

Four times he asked for legal assistance. He devoted his whole statement to it; his wanting a lawyer. So, do you really think that 18 hours later, he was offered a lawyer, and he turned it down?

The State told us that, but the State was damaged by his address. The State needed to do damage control over it.

I tell you that Attorney H. Louis Nichols never met with the real Oswald. He met with an Oswald double. And he probably died not realizing it.

The reason I asked you to watch the MPC again is because I wanted you to see how sincerely and earnestly and unflinchingly Oswald asked for a lawyer. He begged for one. And after doing that, if he had turned down a lawyer on the same calendar day, he would have had to be insane. And he was not insane. Oswald never met with Nichols. They waited until Oswald was taken to his Saturday evening interrogation, and then they put an Oswald double in his cell, and that is who turned down Nichols' offer of a lawyer.

And did you hear that racket during his address? You actually hear a man giving a military order: "At ease." It's at 1:37. That's the final order given to a firing squad after they have killed someone. Do you really think someone yelled "At ease" at the Midnight Press Conference? Of course not. Why would someone have done that? It was added in editing. The State did it. They did it to Oswald, and they bamboozled us. They have been bamboozling us for 62 years.

Despite multiple witnesses claiming to see a hole in the windshield, I reject the claim that JFK was shot in the throat through the glass, and for multiple reasons.

First, shooting through the curved, laminated glass of the windshield does deflect the bullet.

Second, the bottom of his throat WAS the target. It’s not as though they were trying to shoot him in the face but missed. Nor is it that they were trying to shoot him in the chest but missed. That tiny little area was the target, and if they took the shot through the windshield, then it had to be taken from far away, such as the bridge over the Triple Underpass. It is not reasonable to think that anyone would expect to hit such a small target from that distance, even without going through glass. And remember that they missed JFK completely in one shot and hit Connally.

Third, if they shot him through the windshield, it had to be a metal bullet, and something had to happen to it.  Either it traversed him or it stayed in him. But, Dr. Perry saw that it was an entrance wound in his throat, and he had the same thought: “What happened to the bullet?” He quickly determined that there was no exit wound for it. Therefore, it had to be in him, and he looked for it. He cut the strap muscle trying to find it. But, he didn’t find it. The Bethesda doctors did not open up JFK’s neck, but they did x-ray him, and they said there was no bullet in him. Now, you can’t say that the bullet was dug out at the “pre-autopsy” because Perry saw JFK before the pre-autopsy. And remember that there were two very different medical teams. One was government (Bethesda) and the other was independent (Parkland). The plotters had to know that the first doctors to see JFK were going to be independent.  We shouldn’t doubt what Dr. Perry first said: that it was an entrance wound, without an exit wound, and no missile was found. And since it wasn’t found by x-ray either, it means that there was no bullet in JFK’s body.

Fourth, all of the above means that JFK was not hit in the throat with a metal bullet. He must have been hit with a “blood soluble” missile that dissolved. I put that in quotes  because that is how the great JFK researcher Jack White put it.  It’s  the only plausible reason why no bullet was found.

Fifth, the plotters knew in advance that they were going to claim that all the shots came from the rear.  So, if they shot him from the front, which they did, they had to do it in a way that they could claim that it came from the rear. So, the plan to call the entrance wound in his throat an exit wound was made beforehand. The truth is that the shot in his back, taken high on the hill, was more like a prick. It was not a metal bullet, and no bullet was found. So, they had to prick his throat too, so that they could claim that it was all one shot that traversed him; hence, no bullet in his back, and no bullet in his throat. So, the Single Bullet Theory was conjured up in advance; it just didn’t include Connally.

Sixth, considering the need to take the throat shot from very close range, and to AVOID having to shoot through the windshield, and to avoid subjecting anyone else in the car to risk, I believe that the throat shot was taken by Umbrella Man using the weapon that Charles Senseny designed for the CIA: an umbrella gun.  Here is his testimony to the Church Committee.

https://aarclibrary.org/publib/church/reports/vol1/pdf/ChurchV1_6_Senseney.pdf

If you read his testimony, you’ll see that he was very impressive and convincing. There are no holes in his story.  But, the guy who claimed to be Umbrella Man to the HSCA, Steven Louis Witt, was a joke.  And do you know who agrees with me? It’s someone who is getting this letter, the great investigative reporter Russ Baker. He wrote this piece: JFK Umbrella Man, More Doubts:

https://whokilledjfk.net/steven_witt.htm

So, just consider that Witt actually told the HSCA that on November 22, 1963, he was not seeking to attend the JFK motorcade. He was just out for his usual lunchtime walk from the insurance company he worked for in downtown Dallas. He said he just ran into the motorcade. AND THEN HE JUST HAPPENED TO PLANT HIIMSELF IN THE TINY LITTLE KILL ZONE???? Of all the places he could stop, he stopped there???? What, did he have intuition? And, why did he have an umbrella with him? When he left his office at 12:15, or whatever, there was no sign of rain. It was sunny and warm. And then he got the idea to taunt JFK with his umbrella? He actually believed that by waving his umbrella, JFK would see him and get the thought, “He is mocking my father with that umbrella because my father tried to prevent World War II, and that umbrella represents Neville Chamberlain who appeased Hitler.” That is preposterous, but it also preposterous that a man who was only 13 years old when WW2 broke out would still be focused on Joseph Kennedy’s actions in the lead-up to the war. By 1963, the Nazis were long gone, and we had a new enemy: the Soviet Union. So how could this insurance salesman still be so mired in the past? It is ridiculous, and it is not credible.  

So, what do I make of the witnesses who claimed to see a bullet hole? I don’t know what to make of them, but I do know that what I’m telling you trumps them. And I have a sneaking suspicion that the plotters wanted the bullet hole story to surface and flourish. And that’s because they added the bullet hole to the windshield of the Altgens photo, to go along with their phony imagery of JFK and Jackie in the back seat, in order to sell the idea that the Altgens photo was taken after the throat shot. It wasn’t. It was taken before the throat shot when the limo was still high on the hill. What the Altgens photo really captured was the back shot, which was supposed to stay under the radar.

But, even if you are not yet ready to support the latter part of this missive, the first part, that the absence of a bullet in JFK’s throat and the absence of an exit wound for it mean that he was not hit with a metal bullet, which means that it was a dissolvable missile, which means that it could not possibly have gone through glass- that is unassailable. JFK was NOT shot in the throat through the windshield, period, and that’s final.

 If the imagery of JFK and Jackie in the Altgens photo is real, then it should correspond to some Zapruder frame without contradiction. I know that Zapruder shot from the north side of Elm, while Altgens was in the street on the south side of Elm. So, there was an angular difference. However, our minds can account for that. With that considered, there still has to be complete consistency.

So, what frame does it correspond to? The urban legend is that it corresponds to 255, and one guy, Rob Mastroianni, proposed it as the matching frame. And I responded by pointing out the discrepancies between Altgens and 255, which you can see below. And I could have said more, but I ran out of room.

And I can do that for any Zapruder frame. That's because there is no Zapruder frame that corresponds to what we see in Altgens. That's because what we see in Altgens isn't real. It is art. Crude, crappy, JFK art.

But, you have to say which Zapruder frame Altgens corresponds to, because if you don't, then your claim is empty.

So, here is the slap-down of 255. If anyone else wants to take a shot, go ahead. You can't win. I can slap down every frame. That's because there is no frame that corresponds to it.

 This gif shows you that Jackie really did try to coax JFK's arm down. She first placed her right hand on his upper arm at frame 246. Then, at frame 254, she has her left hand on his forearm. And after that she continues to coax his arm down. 

I think they were both involved. I think she was coaxing his arm down, and he was responding to that by leaning towards her. I don't think he relaxed his arm. I think it was more of a tipping action. But, I do think that in a very visceral way he was responding to her. Mentally, he was gone. He was in a state of utter confusion and derangement. And that's why I say he was responding to her viscerally; not consciously and not with any focus. 

And then, as they got to Jean Hill and Mary Moorman, Jackie raised her right elbow, which created leverage. And it stayed like that, with her right elbow high, until he was shot at 313. The last frame I have in this gif is 312.

And I can't claim to know how focused she was either, but I do know that, on some level, she was intent on getting him to put his arm down. 

Without a doubt, her right hand was on his upper arm, and her left hand was on his forearm. 

So, how does that compare with the image of them in Altgens? It shows both her hands on him, but they are on this long wand-like arm. 

But, she didn't have both hands on him until 254. 

But, it's obvoius that in Altgens, he is still in the throes of panic, and it is more consistent with frame 230.

Can you see that JFK in Altgens correlates with 230? That's a match. 

And Altgens said that he took his picture right when he heard the shot. And this was very soon after the shot. And notice that in both, JFK isn't focused on her at all. He is totally absorbed in what he's doing.  He's in a panic. He can't breathe. He has to clear his airway. And he hasn't done it yet. 

Those correlate well in terms of HIM. But, what about HER? In 230 she isn't touching hin at all; not with either hand. But, in Altgens, she has both hands on him. So, what do you make of that? 

What you should make of it is that JFK and Jackie in the Altgens photo is bogus imagery. It isn't real. It's art. It's crude, crappy art, but still art. And that crude, crappy art replaced whatever was really captured. 

So, what was captured? Well, let's take Altgens at his word. He said he snapped the shudder right when he heard the first shot. The first shot was the shot that hit JFK in the back high on the hill. It would have shown a startled look on his face; a reaction that something weird had just happened to him, but he wasn't sure what. And they couldn't let the world see that because that shot was supposed to stay under the radar. It was the shot that, officially, never happened. 

So, they made the decision to change it to a latter time and a different place, lower on the hill when JFK was shot in the throat. 

But, they were never going to say that he was shot in the throat. The plan all along was to say that he was struck in the back with a bullet (he was not; it was an ice dart) and that the "bullet" exited through his throat. 

In other words, the Single Bullet Theory was baked in the cake before 11/22. It's just that they weren't planning to include Connally. They had to add him after he was accidentally shot. 

This proves that the imagery of JFK and Jackie in Altgens is totally  bogus and inconsistent with the Zapruder film. They do not correlate. Those arrogant bastards thought they could rewrite the story in the photo, pushing it later in time and lower on the hill. 

 The lapdogs for the US Government that killed Kennedy and Oswald are trying to play the angle card. They're saying that the reason why JFK and Jackie look so different in the Altgens photo than they do in the Zapruder film is because of the different angle.

The truth is that when we see the something from a different angle, our mind can quickly process the difference, so that we know we are looking at the same thing, such these two images of MLK during his "I have a dream" speech. They are different, but there is no contradiction between them. They are consistent with each other.

But, that is NOT true with JFK and Jackie in the Altgens photo compared to the Zapruder film. And the truth is that what we see in the Altgens photo is not only inconsistent with the Zapruder film, but it is not reproducible at all. You couldn't duplicate that image. You couldn't put a man and woman in the backseat of a car and take a picture of then with her clutching his arm and make it look like that. You couldn't get it to look like that no matter what you did. It's falseness is demonstrated by it not being reproducible.

So, to all my enemies out there, and I know I have plenty, what you need to do is STFU and get a camera out and try to reproduce the Kennedys in the Altgens photo. I'm not interested in your lipflapping. Get a camera out and show us that it's real by duplicating it. And make sure your image looks EXACTLY like it. There's no need for you to say another word until you do that.

 It's important to understand what you are seeing in the Zapruder film. What do you think Jackie is doing? Do you think she is holding his arm just to comfort him? No. She is holding his arm because she is pressing down on it. She is trying to get him to put his arms down; to stop holding them up like that. So, she is coaxing him to relax his arms. That's what she's doing.

However, her attempt to get him to relax his arms was futile. He couldn't put them down. His muscles were clenched in spasm, and it was beyond his control. It was the action of a nerve agent. So, the effect of her doing that was just to tip him a little bit.

So, his deltoids were in spasm, which was holding his arms up. And his biceps and brachialis muscles were also in spasm, which maintained the extreme flexion. And the result was that his elbows were jutting out like wings. So, she had one hand on his forearm and her other hand on his upper arm, and she was pressing down. And his elbow was in-between her two hands.

But, what are we seeing on the right in the Altgens photo? There, he's got this long straight arm that is extending out like a wand. There isn't the slightest bend in the elbow. He doesn't seem to have an elbow. And she has both her hands on the wand-arm, which seems to be going on forever, and way past him. How can anybody claim that these two pictures show the same thing? They don't. They are vastly different. And what we see on the right doesn't make sense. It's freaky. It is a totally unintelligible image. How can anyone claim that it's real?

 I know that when you first hear that JFK was hit with an ice dart that contained a nerve agent that it's hard to believe. So, I am writing this concise statement about it. 

First, I already proved that the freeway sign in the Zapruder film is bogus, and if you haven't seen my video about it, here is the link. You can watch it afterwards. Finish reading this first. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiJMrM_QKyc

So, the "story" of the Zapruder film is that JFK was fine and dandy until he disappeared behind the enormous and very concealing freeway sign, and he was shot behind the sign, and when he emerged his mind was gone; he was mute; he was totally helpless; and his muscles were acting very weirdly as they spasmed and the spasming spread. 

So, that much we can see. But, what happened to him behind that sign to cause all those effects? Exactly what trauma did he receive? 

Well, the official story, of course, has it that he received the Single Bullet that went through him. But, that story is a lie. I'm not going to go into here, but if the Single Bullet Theory is a lie, then the default is that JFK experienced just what Dr. Humes and the Bethesda doctors found and described: a very shallow wound in his back. And he also experienced the wound in his throat that Dr. Perry found at Parkland Hospital in Dallas. And he also experienced the massive head wound that was described very differently by the Bethesda doctors than it was described by the Parkland doctors. I won't go into that because that came later. So, at the time that JFK emerged from behind the freeway sign with all his weirdness, he had just experienced the shallow back wound that damaged no vital tissue, and the throat wound of Dr. Perry, and that is all.  

Those wounds could not have destroyed JFK's mind, as seen in the Zapruder film, nor could they have caused the bizarre neuro-muscular manifestations that he exhibited in the Zapruder film. 

So, physical trauma did not cause the effects on him that we see in the Z-film. 

But, let's return to the back wound. If it was as shallow as the Bethesda doctors reported, the missile could not have been a metal bullet because a metal bullet could not have stopped that short. When you consider the velocity and momentum of the bullet, and the amount of resistance needed to dissipiate all its energy in order to stop it, an inch and a half of soft tissue in JFK's back was not enough to do that; to stop it. But, if the missile were ice, ice is unstable, and it bursts easily. So, it could stop that short, not because of resistance acting on the bullet, in the classical physics sense, but because the ice burst and was instantly gone. 

But, the bottom line is that we know that in the 1950s, the CIA developed such a gun that could do that: deliver an ice dart containing one or more toxins, and causing a very shallow wound. It was called the CIA heart attack gun:

https://www.maloriesadventures.com/blog/the-c-i-a-heart-attack-gun-the-weapon-that-leaves-no-trace

Not only was the gun found, but stockpiles of shellfish toxin (a neurotoxin) and cobra venom (another neurotoxin) were found. CIA director William Colby answered questions about it to the Church Committee, and when asked if the gun was ever used on anyone, Colby said no. He actually had the nerve to claim that it was intended as a suicide weapon that agents could use to off themselves- if necessary. And that is ridiculous. Weren't potassium cyanide tablets better and more efficient for that purpose? But, Colby was no fool. He certainly wasn't going to say that the CIA shot people with it, including JFK. He'd have been killed if he said that, and I believe he was killed anyway.  

So, the ice gun with intoxicants was definitely in the possession of the CIA in 1963, and they had developed it.

All that's left is to present the evidence for JFK's intoxication, which comes mainly from what we see in the Zapruder film. First: his weird muscular dyskinesia that could only have been drug-induced, not trauma-induced. 

Then, there was also the testimonial evidence, particularly from Jackie Kennedy that JFK never spoke. The last thing he said in his life was in response to Nellie Connally before anything happened. She said to him that you certainly can't say that the people of Dallas didn't turn out for you, and he said, "I certainly can't." That was on Elm Street shortly before he was shot, and he never said anything after he was shot. His muteness was NOT due to the throat shot. It damaged coils on the left side of his trachea, but it did not damage his larynx. His voice would have sounded different, but he could have spoken. But, he did not speak, nor did he attempt to speak, and it was due to his complete mental collapse. 

Again: JFK's complete mental collapse cannot be ascribed to his physical trauma to that point. And his neuromuscular derangement, so apparent in the Zapruder film, cannot be attributed to physical trauma either. And that leaves poisoning as the only plausible explanation for those phenomena. And the means to shoot those toxins into him definitely existed in 1963, and with direct ties to the CIA. 

I am going to walk you through it, one step at a time. First, observe that JFK's fist is under his face. It looks more like a hoof than a hand, but we'll put that aside.

But you know, that if his fist is under his face, the farthest his arm can extend out is to the side is his elbow. Here I am doing it, and there is no alternative to this.

So, what is happening in the Altgens photo? What is Jackie grasping? How could his arm be extending all the way out to where her hands are? It's impossible.

What do you think would happen if you put a man and woman in the back of a car and tried to duplicate this? It wouldn't look like this. He would have his elbow bent, as I did, and she would have to be much closer to hiim. She would have to be right next to him. She couldn't be so far away from him that all we could see is her hands. Where is the rest of her? I inserted an image of her to show you how ridiculous it is to think that it looked like this.

 When I first started studying the Altgens photo, I was so focused on the doorway, that I didn’t notice that the whole photo was temporally altered. It is time-shifted and space-shifted. The “story” of the Altgens photo is that it was taken after JFK was shot in the throat, which means that it was taken when the limo was across from the pergola. But, that isn’t true. It was taken before he was shot in the throat, when the limo was still high on the hill, across from the TSBD, just 30 yards from the intersection.

But, the photo shows him reacting to the throat shot, and I tell you that that imagery is fake. And I can prove it.

So, where on Elm Street was JFK when the photo was taken? Well, we’ve got the lineup of cars to use as a measuring stick. There are just 3 cars behind Kenndy, and then you’re in the intersection. They’re all close together except for the distance between the Queen Mary and LBJ’s car, and I suspect that’s because LBJ told the driver to stay back, knowing that bullets were going to be flying.

So, JFK’s distance from the intersection was the length of the trunk of the limo, the length of the Queen Mary, the gap to LBJ’s car, the length of LBJ’s car (which was a compact) and then the length of the VEEP SS car, which was also rather small. Add that up, and that’s how far JFK was from Houston St. And that means that he wasn’t far from the intersection.  And it means that he wasn’t shot in the throat yet.

Also, notice how curved the road is. Look on the right at the angle of the curb. It’s round. That is a lot of curve. Doesn’t that have to be the curve from Houston St.? What else could it be?

Then, right there on the curve, there is a guy clapping. That’s supposed to be Charles Brehm, except the road wasn’t curved where he was. It was straight. And he wasn’t up by the intersection across from the TSBD. He was down the hill across from the pergola. He was in the country; not in the city. That’s how I like to put it. So, they just installed those clapping hands there to represent him; to tell the story that this was all happening much lower on Elm and much farther on the intersection.

Now, Altgens said in his testimony that he pressed the shudder to take his picture right when he heard the first shot. The throat shot was NOT the first shot. And even it were, the photo shows JFK and Jackie after the shot, when he was in a panic and she was attending to him. The first shot was the back shot, and it did strike him high on the hill, just a little past the intersection. And, as I have told you, it wasn’t a bullet. It was an ice flechette containing a toxic payload, including a nerve agent.

Now, if you haven’t been following me, and you are hearing it for the first time, I get it that it sounds looney. But, it is not looney. The Zapruder film shows us that JFK suffered a complete mental collapse, including the inability to speak. His muteness was not due to the throat shot because it didn’t hit his larynx. It was due to his mental collapse. And his bizarre muscle spasms, seen in the Zapruder film, were due to nerve agent toxicity. Moreover, once you dismiss the ridiculous Single Bullet Theory, you realize that he had only a very shallow wound in his back. A metal bullet could not have stopped that short, but an ice bullet could because ice is unstable and bursts easily.

Notice that none of the spectators in the Altgens photo seem to be aware that anything is wrong. They are smiling.  That’s because the photo was taken very early and long before JFK was shot in the throat.

Now, look at Clint Hil on the standing board. Notice how relaxed he looks. He is NOT poised to act. He is not about to go into motion. He is not about to jump off and catch up with the limo. He is totally planted there like he doesn’t have a care in the world. He is not aware of anything, and he is not going anywhere. It hasn’t reached that point yet. It’s far from it.

Now, let’s consider the imagery of JFK and Jackie. His left hand is too big, and his right hand is shriveled. His arm is extending out like a vacuum wand, way past the limit of his body. Where she is grasping it is way beyond him. His elbow was bent. That long thing can’t possibly be his arm.  She might as well be a mile away from him.  It is a bogus image that replaced whatever was there. And what was there was JFK reacting to having been shot in the back.

So, they developed the Altgens photo and saw right away that it contained Oswald in the doorway, and it also showed JFK reacting to being shot in the back high on the hill, which no one was supposed to know about, let alone see.  They should have destroyed it instantly. But, those brazen, reckless operatives, drunk with arrogance and power, cock-sure they could get away with anything, decided to fix it.  And they blew it big-time. And they even added the hole in the windshield. They must have heard about it, and they wanted to link this photo to it. Why? Because it came later. They didn't care about the implications. If people wanted to think that JFK was shot through the windshield, they didn't care. They knew it wasn't going to go anywhere.

Bill Shelley and Billy Lovelady both said they left the entrance immediately after the shooting and joined the throng of people who poured into the railway yard. This is them as seen in the Couch film. They were walking down the sidewalk on the utility road in front of the building.

Now, there’s no doubt that it’s them. They were both the same height, 5’8”. Shelley was slender and had pompadour hair. He wore a jacket. And Lovelady is wearing the clothes that he told the FBI he wore. They both said that they were there doing that.

Now, if that’s not them, it means that they still have to be there, that there has to be another couple of men there like those two. But, there aren’t. There is just those two. And that means that those two are them, Shelley and Lovelady.

 So, there is Billy Lovelady on 11/22/63 alongside Doorman and Oswald. You can see that Oswald and Doorman are wearing the exact same clothes, and Lovelady is wearing very different clothes.

What I have been telling you is the truth: Billy Lovelady did not wear a plaid shirt. That was a lie that they concocted. He wore a short sleeved striped shirt. And he looked nothing like Oswald or Doorman.

The truth is that Doorman was Oswald, and your government has not only been lying to you about it; but they are the ones who killed Kennedy and Oswald.

Lovelady did NOT wear a plaid shirt, and Doorman’s shirt isn’t plaid anyway. It’s true that Lovelady posed in a plaid shirt, but he feared for his life. He knew they’d kill him if he didn’t. And they killed him anyway, unless you think they just got lucky that he died of a fatal first heart attack at the age of 41 right when the HSCA Final Report was coming out.

I was not the one who discovered the images of Shelley and Lovelady in the Couch film. That was Gerda Dunkel, and it was about 15 years ago.  And her discovery of them is surely the most important discovery in JFK assassination research in the 21^st century.

 Congresswoman Luna, I'm sure that what NBC has is the unaltered Dave Wiegman film. He was an NBC photographer, and he was in the 7th car in the motorcade, which was the first camera car, a convertible. He captured Oswald in the doorway as he rounded the corner. But, the film was deliberately blurred to obscure Oswald. This is it. And as in the Altgens photo, Oswald was clasping his hands in front, which was his habit. Ralph Cinque

 There was no Prayer Man. He was nobody. He was invented. He was concocted. And when he was first introduced in 1991 in Oliver Stone’s film JFK, there was no claim that he was Oswald.

It’s claimed that the Prayer Man clip came from the Darnell film, although most renderings don’t show it. For a long time, no versions showed it.

What happened was that the beginning of the Darnell film was cut from it.  Apparently, it showed something that they didn’t want us to see. It was finally shown in 1991, 28 years later, and it was in Oliver Stone’s movie JFK, but it was heavily altered. Oliver Stone was bamboozled. They had 28 years to do it.  And when they showed it then, there was no claim that Prayer Man was Oswald. The purpose of showing it then was to show Officer Marrion Baker running to the entrance. Except it doesn’t do that. The running cop was not Baker. He was another officer.

There is an excellent presentation about it by a guy who used to go by the name Saintly Oswald.  The gist of it is that the running cop came from a different location than Baker parked his bike. And it’s at the end of the clip that the real Baker arrived, pulling up and parking his bike on the island with the traffic light, which was directly across from the doorway, and they inserted a walking man in a suit to cover him up. Watch this video and you’ll see.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFMQl61nx-U

So, why do I say that Prayer Man didn’t exist? It’s because none of the people in the Darnell doorway existed. It was just 10 seconds after the shots, so the same people should be there who were there before. But, we don’t recognize any of them. You can click on the picture to blow it up.

None of these people can be correlated with any of the people who were known to be there. None of them match any of the other images of the doorway. And what it shows, which is people flocking into the TSBD right after the shots, didn’t happen. Who are those people? You can’t identify a single one of them.

Some people have tried to claim that the guy at the top of the steps in the white pajama top was Frazier, but that is ridiculous. Frazier wore a black jacket. I don’t mean a suit jacket. It was a short jacket, and it looked like something from school. It had lettering on the back of it. He wasn’t in white. But furthermore, and more important is the fact that that guy at the top of the steps is a freak. He isn’t human. No human could be built like that. No human could stand like that. He is a freak. Everything about his shape and his angles is cartoonish. He is art; very bad, crappy art.

We can’t identify any of those people. This is all fabrication, including Prayer Man. His problem is that his head is way too small in proportion to his massive body. If he were real, he would be a case of microcephaly. And to claim that he is Oswald is totally absurd. Oswald was 5’9” 131 pounds. The Dallas Police weighed and measured him. He was skinny. If he were any skinnier, he’d have been emaciated. How could that fat tub be Oswald?

The Prayer Man myth started in the UK.  Why are so many Brits obsessed with the JFK assassination? It’s because they are recruited to do social media JFKing.  Why Brits? It’s because they speak English, yet, they are far removed. And the same goes for Aussies. There are a lot of them in the Prayer Man Cult too.

Oswald was the Altgens Doorman, and the Prayer Man cult was started to muddy the waters.  Pay no attention to the evil Prayermanites.  They are up to no good, and they are part of the whole evil world of JFKing.  And there is something else that they did that I will show you next time, and it’s quite shocking.

 Now, I am going to discuss the situational evidence that supports the photographic evidence that Oswald was in the doorway during the shooting. And it’s not that the photographic evidence needs help. The photographic evidence is conclusive. It’s like in fingerprint matching. Once they get up to, say, 14 matching points between two fingerprints, that’s it. It’s the same guy. And the matching points between Oswald and Doorman are easily that high.

But, I want you to understand the situational evidence because it will show you just how disingenuous and bankrupt the Lovelady talking heads are.

The first is that Oswald told investigators that he was out in front, and he named someone who was there: Bill Shelley. How did Oswald know that Shelley was there?  And of course, Shelley was there? Oswald knew it because he was also there. He even parsed it that way. He said that he was out in front with Bill Shelley. To me it implies that there was some interaction between the two of them; that they had an exchange. And I do believe they did. I believe that Shelley ordered Oswald to go to the lunchroom. And that’s why Oswald did it; not to get a Coke.

But, the bottom line is that the ONLY way Oswald could have known that Shelley was out in front was by being there himself.

The second point takes us to the 2^nd  floor lunchroom and what happened there. We know, for an absolute fact, that at 12:31, plus some seconds, Oswald was spotted by Officer Marrion Baker, and Oswald was on the move. Oswald was moving through the vestibule of the lunchroom and into the lunchroom. In other words, Oswald was just getting to the lunchroom. So, what does that mean?

Well, first, since he was just getting there at 12:31+, it means that he wasn’t there at 12:30. It means that he was somewhere else at 12:30. Is it possible that he was there at 12:30, but then got up and left, heading somewhere else for 30 seconds or so, and then changed his mind, and went back to the lunchroom? It was physically possible, theoretically, yes. But, no one has the right to assume it. It is not a card in anyone’s hand. There is no basis to go there, mentally. If it looked like Oswald was just getting to the lunchroom at 12:31+, then by all outward appearances, he came from somewhere else to get there. There is no reason, no basis, and no intellectual right to assume anything else. I am not making the rules here, but I am enforcing them.

So, where was Oswald before he went to the lunchroom? To answer that, you have to understand the mechanics of the maze. One thing is certain: Oswald got into the vestibule of the lunchroom either by going through the door on the office side, or by going through the door on the stairwell side, through which Baker was looking. We can answer that question. The vestibule was so small, that if Oswald had gone through the door on the stairwell side, then that door would have still been open. It was a spring door. When you let it go, it slowly closed. It didn’t slam shut. It had a spring that slowly closed it. It was such a tiny little room that there is no way that door could have closed at all if Oswald was still in the room-had he gone through it. But, he didn’t. Oswald went through the door on the office side, and that’s why there was no movement in the door through which Baker was looking. And when he say he was looking through the door, I mean through the glass in the door.

But, there’s more because Oswald and Baker got to the lunch room at essentially the same time. Oswald was a little bit ahead of him. When Baker saw Oswald in the vestibule, they were probably no more than 15 feet apart. Knowing how massive the building was, 15 feet wasn’t much.

So, if Oswald had come down from the 6^th floor, Baker would have seen him and heard him before he entered the vestibule. And forget about Baker because Truly was well ahead of Baker. Do you remember what I said about them looking for an armed killer, and Truly having no qualms about leading the way?

So, how could Oswald have come down from the 6^th floor without running into Truly? He couldn’t have because he surely would have. So, that is more proof that Oswald did not come down from the 6^th floor. So, how did he reach the office side of the vestibule?

There is only one way, and that is, that he climbed the one flight of stairs in the southeast corner of the building. There is simply no other way he could have gotten there. But, where was he before he got to the stairs? Well, the stairs were right next to the doorway. All you had to do was go through the double doors and then turn right. There was a stairwell there for that one flight of stairs. So, the situation proves that Oswald went from the doorway to the 2^nd floor lunch room.

And another thing that works is the timeline. I told you that Oswald’s departure from the doorway happened right when Dave Wiegman was passing the building. I told you that there must have been a commotion over it that caused Wiegman to do a second pan of the doorway- which he did. All you have to do is watch the Wiegman film, and you’ll see that Wiegman captured the doorway spontaneously the first time, but the second time, he did it deliberately. He actually swung around to his right to pan the doorway a second time. It is 2026, but we can see that in the film as through we were there in 1963. And then, as I told you, Oswald had gone, and so they replaced him with a still image, so that there would be a Doorman there.

But, think about the time. It was close to the time of the fatal head shot, but I think it was  a little bit before it.  Do you realize that Baker parked his bike right on the Elm Street island? In other words, he parked right directly across from the doorway. And all he had to do was run across that utility street in front of the building, and he was at the doorway. So, he did that, and Truly offered to help him. They ran to the back of the building. They tried to secure an elevator, but when they realized they were not working, they went to the stairs in the northwest corner, with Truly leading. And that is some weird shit, that Truly wanted to lead the way in search of a ruthless killer.

But, the difference was that Truly and Baker were scurrying. I don’t know that you could say they were running, but they were certainly moving fast.  But, Oswald who left the doorway before they did, was surely only walking. I assume he walked at his normal pace. So, Oswald started first, but he was just walking. Baker and Truly started some seconds later, but they were moving faster. And the result was that even though they covered the same distance going different paths, they got to the lunch room about the same time.

And actually, Truly was ahead of Oswald, because Truly would have seen him in the vestibule, just as Baker did, but he didn’t because Oswald hadn’t gotten there yet.

So, what we can conclude is that Truly got there first; Oswald got there second; and Baker got there third.

But, knowing the trek that Oswald took to get to the lunchroom tells us that his starting point must have been the doorway.

Remember too that Carolyn Arnold said that she saw Oswald at the doorway shortly before the shooting. She told that to FBI Agent Richard Emberling on Monday, November 26. By “at the doorway” I mean that the entrance to the building was glass: clear glass. The door and the whole wall were glass. So, she saw Oswald peering through the glass from the inside. So, he was at the doorway. She put the time at 12:25. Emberling wrote down 12:15, thinking that that would have left Oswald enough time to get upstairs to shoot Kennedy.  But, higher-ups at the FBI, upon seeing it, realized that it was no good. They stormed back there, like the Gestapo, in March and demanded that she sign a statement saying that she didn’t see Oswald at all that day.  And she did. She was a pregnant 19 year old girl. She wasn’t going to mess with the FBI.

Then, 15 years later, in 1978, the story got published that Carolyn Arnold had recently revised her story and said that she saw Oswald eating in the 2^nd floor lunch room at 12:25 when she was heading downstairs. You know that can’t be true from what I’ve told you. Since Oswald was just getting to the lunch room at 12:31, he could not have been there at 12:30.

I don't know what to make of the Carolyn Arnold revision. Was she threatened? Was she bribed? Was it even her? I'm not sure it was. The whole thing may have been a ruse.

The best treatment of the Carolyn Arnold affair was by Professor Gerald McKnight in Breach of Trust: How the Warren Commission failed the nation and why.  I had the privilege of knowing him. I never met him in person, but I talked to him on the phone, quite a few times. He was on hospice at the time, but he was still mentally sound. And I really think he enjoyed our conversations. It was from Dr. McKnight that I learned that the Dallas Police weighed Oswald, and he was only 131 pounds, and he was 5’9”.  That is really skinny. I’m 5’6” and I weight 145.  Lovelady was 5’8” 170, but that was 3 months later. I’d bet you dimes to dollars he was more like 180 on 11/22/63. So, the claim that Oswald and Lovelady looked alike is poppycock.

Folks, there is no doubt that the Altgens Doorman was Oswald, and the fight over it is the Armageddon of the JFK world.  It is the ultimate battle between Good and Evil.

I have shown you that the situational evidence fully supports the photographic evidence for Oswald in the doorway.  There is going to be a reckoning.  I say we tear down the whole stinking edifice of lies, and we do it over this. Stop the lies. Oswald outside.