I am amazed that this video is still up on Youtube because it reveals so much about the JFK assassination. It's a video of Jean Hill and Mary Moorman that was shot months after the assassination. I believe it was done in the Spring of 1964.

Jean Hill came first, and you can skip her part. Just watch Mary who starts at 1:43.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lx34V4-nk1M

The first thing she says is: "I stepped out into the street." Then, she shows how she took her picture, which was facing up Elm, that is, facing the approaching limo. She said she stood there for quite a few seconds "because I wanted to make sure that they were looking at me." She said, "I followed it for so many seconds, and then I did take the picture."

Now, we have to take her at her word. There is no basis to believe that she lied or that she didn't remember what she did. It's obvious from what she said that she wanted to capture their faces. And there is no reason to doubt that she did.

And a few minutes prior to that, she photographed her friend Officer Glenn McBride, whom she knew from church, and she captured his face the very same way she described capturing the faces of the Kennedys.

Over time, Mary changed her story. She started to deny that she stepped into the street. And she changed her story by saying that she didn't take the picture until the Kennedys were right across from her, directly in line with her. There is no reason to believe that she did that. We have to go by her first statement. But, her revised statement does not match the Moorman photo either. To match the Moorman photo, she would have had to say, "I waited until they passed me; then I shot the backs of their heads."

So, accepting what she first said, as we must do, we have to assume that the photo she took was very different from the Moorman photo that we have. In fact, it must have been the opposite of the Moorman photo. Instead of shooting them after they passed her, she shot them before they reached her. And instead of capturing the backs of their heads, she captured their faces, just as she captured the face of Officer Glenn McBride.

So, how did Mary Moorman come to accept the extant Moorman photo as her own? How did she talk herself into believing that that was the photo that she took?

I tell you that there was mind control involved. In 2013, she did a very long interview for the 50th. It was 4 hours long. I watched the whole thing. It used to be available on Youtube, but it no longer is.

But, in that interview, she said that after the assassination, federal agents kept coming back to her and borrowing her photo. The FBI. The CIA. The Secret Service. And the FBI again. And when the FBI returned it the second time, the big white thumbprint was on it, which they said was an accident.

Now, do you believe that? That the white thumbprint was an accident? If you do, you are either the dumbest mudderbloker who ever lived OR you are soaked in the blood of John Kennedy and Lee Oswald, both of whom were killed by the U.S. government.

But, when they returned that photo to her, which they said was accidentally damaged, what do you think they did? They admitted that they damaged her invaluable historical photo. Do you think they just made an apology and left it at that? What happens when a person damages someone else's property? What does the person who suffered the damage do afterwards? And in this case, the one that did the damage was the U.S. government. And what does the U.S. government have? It has a printing press. And what can it do with that printing press? It can create any amount of money that it wants. It can do it without a printing press. How is the U.S government paying for its evil, monstrous war on Iran right now that is costing billions every day, heaped on top of all the other spending?

I have no evidence that Mary Moorman was paid for the damage that was done to her photo. And she has never said that she was paid. But, the situation is that the U.S. government damaged her very valuable historical photo, and I can't imagine that they would do that damage without compensating her, especially since we live in a country in which damaging another's property results in legal judgments.

So, the question is: Why wouldn't they have given her some money? And by "some" I mean a substantial amount of money.

Again, I have no concrete knowledge of any payout to Mary, and everything I am saying is hypothetical. Mary has never said that she was paid any money. But, to the best of my knowledge, she has never said that she wasn't paid. Non-disclosure agreements get negotiated every day in this country.

Again, I am NOT claiming to know that Mary was paid. And I admit that she has never said that she was paid, and the U.S. government has never said that they paid her. However, I do know, concretely, that Marina Oswald was paid a lot of money after the assassination. There was money from a ghost-written book; money for Oswald's "Historic Diary" and $75,000 for the film rights to her life story that was paid to her by an Italian film company that never made the film and soon went out of business after paying her the money. That company was called "Tex-Italia." How appropriate.

And of course, Marina went on to tell the Warren Commission all the things that the FBI wanted her to tell them, including that Oswald sought to kill Nixon in Dallas in April 1963, even though Nixon wasn't in Dallas in April 1963.

But, enough about that. What I really want to talk about is what Mary's real photo captured. Since she got into the street and waited in the street for quite a few seconds before taking her picture, it means that the limo couldn't have been that close. Remember that Officer BJ Martin was hugging the curb on his motorcycle. So, how could she be in the street if he was bearing down on her? So, the limo and its escorts must have been a ways off.

So, what did Mary capture that was so dangerous to the official story? IT MUST HAVE BEEN WHATEVER HAPPENED BETWEEN THE TIME THAT JFK DISAPPEARED BEHIND THE FREEWAY SIGN AND THE TIME HE REAPPEARED ON THE OTHER SIDE. If you accept that what the Zapruder film has from frame 225 on is legit, then what did it matter if Mary captured the same thing? SHE MUST HAVE CAPTURED WHATEVER THE PHONY SIGN WAS PUT IN THERE TO HIDE.

So, what happened in that space? We're talking from frame 208 to 224. So either Mary captured JFK being shot in the throat OR she just captured him reacting to the back shot before he was shot in the throat. Either one was fatal to the official story.

Everything I have told you is true. JFK was shot in the back high on the hill with an ice dart containing a nerve agent that caused only a shallow wound. And it was long before he was shot in the throat by Umbrella Man, which was a puncture wound in the midline of his throat. And that shot too involved a dissolvable missile.

 I am now going to lay out exactly how the attack on Kennedy went down. I don’t address all aspects of the assassination. I don’t claim to be an expert on all aspects. But, I am absolutely certain about what I’m about to tell you, and it is supported by evidence that is extremely compelling, as I will explain.

As they were rounding the corner from Houston to Elm, with LBJ’s SS agents having their door open, the last conversation that JFK had in his life took place between him and Nellie Connally. She said, “You can’t say that Texans didn’t turn out for you.” And he responded, “You’re right; I certainly can’t.”  He never spoke again after that, and HE NEVER TRIED TO COMMUNICATE AGAIN IN ANY WAY AFTER THAT. That is extremely significant because he was a very smart man, and he had been in combat in WW2. And he certainly would have known that he was being shot at- if he were in his right mind.  

And even if you think he couldn’t speak because of the throat trauma, he would have sought to communicate some other way- non-verbally.  But, he couldn’t communicate at all because he suffered a complete mental collapse.

And to everyone who believes that the Single Bullet Theory is bull shit, and it is, what is he left with after you reject the Single Bullet Theory? HE IS LEFT WITH JUST A SHALLOW WOUND IN HIS BACK AND A PUNCTURE WOUND IN HIS THROAT.  His mind would have been 100% intact. But, it wasn’t. His mind was gone. It wasn’t from trauma; it was from poisoning.

So, right after his exchange with Nellie, JFK was shot in the back high on the hill, and it struck him just to the right of third thoracic vertebra. And there is no doubt about that location. When his body was lying prone on the table at Bethesda, the doctors had no trouble locating that wound. That’s because even prone, the Vertebra Prominems sticks out as a visible bump. And that is C7. This is from Google AI:

AI Overview

Yes, the Vertebra Prominens (C7 vertebra) typically remains a visible or palpable, protruding bump even when a person is lying in a prone (face-down) position.

 So, they counted down from C7 and got to T3, which is where the wound was. JFK’s own physician, Dr. George Burkley, drew a diagram of it. And he even put it on JFK’s death certificate that he was shot in the back at the level of T3.

 But, it was a very shallow wound- much to shallow for a metal bullet to have made. Consider a metal bullet traveling 2000 feet per second. When it makes contact, its energy has to be dissipated before the bullet can stop. How is it dissipated? By the resistance of the tissue. It comes down to Newton’s Laws of Motion. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The bullet was acting on JFK’s tissues, but, at the same time, his tissues were acting on the bullet, which was the reaction. 

 But, how much soft tissue would it take to exert enough resistance on the bullet to stop it? A lot more than 2 inches. And that bullet traveled less than 2 inches. How do we know? Well, it didn’t enter his lungs or even violate the pleura. It went through only skin, fascia, and muscle. And that’s why it is physically impossible that a metal bullet struck him in the back. Don’t you know? WHEN YOU LOSE THE SINGLE BULLET THEORY, YOU LOSE THE METAL BULLET.

So, JFK had to have been hit with something other than a metal bullet. But, besides the back wound being very shallow, it was also empty. There was no bullet in it. Now, the notion that it fell out is just plain stupid.  Falling is a function of gravity, and there was no gravitational force pushing on it. Furthermore, the bullet went in through three layers of clothing, and the holes in the clothing would have had to remain aligned for the bullet to go back out through them. That is a ridiculous. It is as unlikely as a planetary alignment.

There are two different versions of the “bullet fell out” claim, both equally stupid. One was by Paul Landis, the SS agent, and the other was by a neighbor of Sam Kinney, the agent who drove the Queen Mary. You need to brush them both off the same way you would scrape dog crap off the sole of your shoe.

 The impact of the ice dart on JFK was very minor. The CIA heart attack gun was designed so that the victim would not know that they were shot. CIA Director William Colby said that it felt like nothing more than a mosquito bite. But, very quickly, JFK started feeling bad, and I mean sick. It included headache, chest tightness, blurred vision, nausea, confusion, other-worldliness, as well as fear and panic.

 Right away, Jackie quit politicking and turned her gaze and attention to her husband, and she stayed looking at him for the duration. In the early 180s of the Z-film, she starts making the turn, and by 188, she is fully turned and has her eyes on him,  never to take her eyes off of him again.  

 Neither of them ever wave again, and as they approach the bogus freeway sign, she is turned looking at him, and he is facing straight ahead with a glob over his face.  You can see it 195, and it stays like that for the rest of Part 1 of the Zapruder film.  

 Also, In the Crofts, Betzner, and Willis photos, neither JFK nor Jackie are waving or engaging with the spectators in any way. So, there’s your confirmation. He was absorbed in what was happening to him, and she was absorbed with him.

 Next came the throat shot.  No doubt it was visible in the film, but they used the phony sign to cover it up. So, what do we know about the throat shot? We know that that tiny little spot at the bottom of his throat was the target. They weren’t trying to shoot him in the face or in the chest. If they had done that, the lone gunman from the rear theory would have died. So, how did they expect to get away with shooting him in the throat? Simple. They planned all along to say that it was an exit wound.

 They knew that a back wound was going to be found with no bullet in it. So, if they created a throat wound that also had no bullet, they could say that the back bullet traversed him. Bingo. The two empty holes would be explained. So, the Single Bullet Theory was planned in advance except that it didn’t include Connally.

 And within a few short minutes, JFK was in the hands of Dr. Malcolm Perry, who was an INDEPENDENT doctor. NOT A GOVERNMENT BUT AN INDEPENDENT DOCTOR.  And Dr. Perry said that JFK had a small entrance wound in his throat, but that there was no bullet inside him, and no exit wound for that shot either.

 And don’t tell me it was dug-out at the pre-autopsy because Perry got to JFK before the pre-autopsy.  

 So, there was no bullet in Kennedy’s throat, which means that that shot did not involve a metal bullet either. And because the target area was very small - no bigger than a quarter- that shot had to be taken from up close. And it was definitely taken from the north side of Elm. So, who was close to Kennedy on the north side of Elm? Umbrella Man was. He was just a few feet away from him at the time of the shot.

 I know I posted the link to the testimony of Charles Senseney before, but now, for the first time, I am going to give you the essentials from it. He was employed as a civilian contractor at Fort Detrick in Maryland, which was the center of the U.S. biological warfare program.  And Senseney gave the year. It was 1953, so 10 years before the JFK assassination. He said he was in the hardware department, not the agent department. And by “agent,” he meant the biological agent that would be delivered with the hardware he developed. He said the CIA was also involved in the project, but they didn’t call themselves that. They called themselves the Staff Support Group.

 Senseney said he was involved in the making of the heart attack gun which delivered what he called “muscle poison.” And muscle poisoning is exactly what we see on JFK, which is why he maintained that freaky pose with his arms raised, stiff and frozen, in the Z-film. Senseney said that by 1970, a decision was made to destroy all the biological agents except one, the shellfish toxin, which is a nerve agent.

 He said that the development of exotic weapons was being done for Special Ops and the CIA. Senseney said he made an M1 weapon (that could deliver a nerve agent) that was shot from a walking cane, and also an umbrella. He said that it required a hand-held object that shot a dart to deliver the nerve agent.

 Now, returning to Elm Street, the throat shot must have been taken from up-close from the north side of Elm, and the only one standing there with an object that Senseney mentioned was Umbrella Man. You can’t go by any of the imagery because they doctored and falsified all the images of Umbrella Man. Eventually, they did a reenactment that displayed UM’s bare face, which was done after the Stemmons Freeway sign was removed, which is why the phony sign in the image is so weird and wacky, being square instead of oblong, and placed too far east to be the real sign.

 I am sure that Umbrella Man took the throat shot because he was the only one who was in position to take it, and he used one of the weapons that Charles Senseney developed.

 So, JFK was shot in the throat with a dart by Umbrella Man, and it had the immediate effect to obstructing JFK’s breathing. He panicked and raised his hands up. With his left hand, he pulled on his tie. And with his right hand, he put it over his mouth and coughed. And that worked. In one cough, he resolved the obstruction. Dr. David Mantik thinks it was probably just a bolus of blood, and that makes sense because if he were choking on a bullet, he probably couldn’t dislodge it in one cough. But, he did resolve that whole issue in one cough. BUT THEN, HE COULDN’T PUT HIS ARMS DOWN. They were frozen, which was the effect of the nerve agent.  That was followed by a long stretch in which Connally got shot, and Jackie tried to coax JFK’s arm down by pressing on it. She got it down a little, but she mostly just tipped him towards her.

 And then at 313, he was hit in the right temple with a frangible bullet, which was designed to explode. They used that kind of bullet because a FMJ would very likely have traversed his head and could have hit Jackie.

 Some researchers, with whom I engage, including Dr. Mantik, think that JFK was shot in the back of the head a tiny fraction of a second before the fatal head shot. I don’t see any evidence of that in the Z-film, but the plotters may have removed it. Dr. Mantik doesn’t claim it based on the Z-film; he claims it based on the x-rays. Of course, since the Z-film was altered, the x-rays were probably altered too. So, I am open to it, but I am not as sure about it as he is. It’s not like money in the bank.

 But, what is like money in the bank is that JFK was shot in the back with the nerve agent high on the hill, no more than 30 yards from the intersection, and maybe just 25 yards. Then, when he was across from the pergola, he was shot in the throat with a dissolving dart that was shot by Umbrella Man with his umbrella. And then he took the fatal head shot from someone who shot a frangible bullet from behind the fence.

 Obviously, there were other shots because Connally got shot, and there were missed shots, and I mentioned the possibility of a preceding head shot. But, the three shots I have laid out here are the essence of how they killed Kennedy.  Please share this.