Something happened on Elm Street that caused JFK to completely disconnect from reality; to lose his mind; and it is the biggest revelation of the Zapruder film. Consider that JFK never spoke; he never tried to speak; he never gestured; he never tried to communicate in any way; he never responded to his wife's ministrations; he never showed any cognizance or understanding of the situation; and he never took any action in response to it. There is no way anyone could have been more divorced from reality than he was.  There isn't one thing that anyone can point to as a sign of awareness on JFK's part.  He suffered a total mental collapse. 

Yet, the wound in his back was no more than deep scratch. The extent to which he was physically impaired from it was zero. It was truly nothing. 

So, what about the throat wound? It damaged his trachea but only on the left side. That shot, whatever it was, briefly caused a respiratory obstruction. But, he cleared it promptly by coughing, and after that, his breathing was fine. That shot hit him so low in the neck that any lower, it would have hit his chest. There is no way it could have done any damage to his brain.  

But, James Fetzer claims that Dr. Bob Livingston said that the throat shot somehow caused brain damage, But that's not what Livingston said. Here he is talking about the throat wound. And did you know that he called Dr. James Humes on the night of the assassination, before the autopsy began, to inform him about the throat wound?  And he reached him. Livingston and was able to talk to him. He told Humes that the Parkland doctors had discovered an entrance wound in JFK's neck, and that he needed to explore its track and try to find any bullet or fragments of bullet that remained. Livingston emphasized that it had to be a frontal wound because there was no tearing of the tissues. He said that Humes listened to him respectfully and was cordial, but he ended the conversation abruptly. Here is Livingston:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ma8aqkr-0Tg

Surely at that time, Livingston had no thought that the throat shot affected JFK's brain. There was no reason for him to think that, and there is no reason for anyone to think that today. 

So, what could have caused JFK's complete mental collapse? Poisoning. There is nothing else. He was hit with an ice dart that burst upon entering, and it delivered a nerve agent and perhaps other drugs. Stop thinking that this is farfetched. It is the only possibility.   

 You should never EVER put your finger in front of the cylinder of a revolver because burning hot gases emit from the cylinder gap, as you can see on the right. On the left is Ruby's Colt Cobra 38 Special, the smallest snub-nosed 38 there is. If he used his middle finger, there would have been no place except along the cylinder for him to put his index finger.

But, Ruby didn't do that, and he wasn't even there. He was already tucked away on the 5th floor, and they had SS Agent Forest Sorrels minding him. But, FBI Agent James Bookhout, who masqueraded as Ruby, didn't do it either. I'm sure he used his index finger in the televised spectacle. But, he posed, for the world, using his middle finger, in the iconic photos that were taken at a photo-shoot an hour before the spectacle. We have testimony that they cleared the garage. to do it.

 The use of the middle finger in the Beers and Jackson photos completely exonerates Jack Ruby because there is no way he would have done that. He had an intact right index finger, and he would have used it. He would have had no reason not to.

The reason usually given for why he used his middle finger- that it was the sign of a Mafia hit- doesn’t make sense. First, it isn’t true. There was no protocol in the Mafia to shoot people with your middle finger. Someone just made it up. And AI agrees, for I got this: "No, shooting a gun with your middle finger is not a recognized sign or ritual of a Mafia hit."

Remember: there are no photographers at Mafia hits. And the victim isn’t going to notice which finger his killer is using. It doesn’t matter anyway because he is about to die. So, who would the Mafia shooter be demonstrating to? Who is going to notice which finger he is using? It doesn't even make sense for the Mafia, let alone for Jack Ruby.

And the whole Mafia story is nonsense. There was no time between November 22 and November 24 that Ruby met with anyone from the Mafia. And they didn’t phone the order in either because we know every call that Ruby made and received. Enough with the Mafia already! They didn’t even have a reason to kill Oswald. He didn’t know anything about them. There was nothing he could tell the police about them. So, why should the Mafia care if he lives or dies? They had nothing to silence him about.

Ruby’s lawyer Melvin Belli suggested that it was the "psychomotor epilepsy" that caused him to use his middle finger, but that is ridiculous. Epilepsy can't do that to a person. Plus, Ruby didn’t have epilepsy. Belli made it up.

I’ve also heard it claimed that there is better control using the middle finger, but that is nonsense. It’s just the opposite. The gun was designed to fit the hand using the index finger. And I mean fit it like a glove. Plus, the whole brain-body connection is stronger to the index finger. Do an experiment. Make your hand into a fist but extend your index finger. Now, it’s like a gun, so pull the trigger a few times. Notice how you, that is your brain, is in your index finger. Notice how strong the connection is. You have fine, sharp motor control, more so than with your middle finger.

Ruby had no reason to use his middle finger, and the idea of using it never would have entered his mind.

What about the Dallas Police? Did they tell Ruby to use his middle finger? The whole idea that Ruby conspired with the Dallas Police to kill Oswald is insane. Were it true, they would have had to kill Ruby pronto. They couldn't trust him afterwards. They were going to arrest him, prosecute him, testify against him, and try to get him sentenced to the death. How is that conducive to trust and loyalty? How big a masochist do you think Ruby was? You think he was going to die for the Dallas Police?

The Dallas Police didn't conspire with Ruby; they conspired against him. They tricked him into believing that he shot Oswald. It was a sting operation on Ruby, like in the movie The Sting. Ruby was their mark.

The middle finger fiasco resulted from a production error, where they mistakenly thought Ruby had lost his right index finger. But, it was his left index finger that got severed. They blew it bigtime at that staged photo-shoot.

On the left is Ruby early Saturday morning, and on the right is the Garage Shooter. They are obviously not the same man. They don’t even look alike.

That Ruby shot Oswald is the most Machiavellian lie. People have been manipulated into believing it for 62 years, but that stops right now. Please share this post.

Here is an image of Jack Ruby's amputated left index finger. So, what are you going to do now that you know that there was an issue concerning Jack Ruby's index fingers? It would be a strange coincidence for Ruby to have both an amputated left index finger and a penchant to fire his pistol with his right middle finger, unnecessarily. Are you just going to brush that off? I am reminded of my film DOVEY'S PROMISE in which I had a trial witness say "Stranger things have happened." But, you can't say that here because there is nothing stranger than a man with an amputated left index finger refraining from using his right index finger to fire a gun unnecessarily. That's as strange as strange gets.

Now i have absolute proof that the Jackson photo was staged. It involves the way the Shooter was using his middle finger to pull the trigger, and it wasn't the right way. I have a gun, a snub-nosed 38 that is similar to the Colt Cobra. YOU WRAP YOUR TRIGGER FINGER AROUND THE TRIGGER. You don't stick it through so that it's poking out. The contact is at the first joint of finger, you wrap it. It even says so in the guidance. Read the small print at the bottom. It says "Trigger on your trigger finger's first joint". 

 

The Jackson photo was supposedly taken a third of a second after the shot went off. And the story went that "Ruby" sought to shoot again, and the only reason he didn't is because LC Graves grabbed the gun. Jim Leavelle, on camara, thanked Graves for saving his life, although that's nonsense because if you watch the films, you see that the Shooter came in from the side, and after firing the shot, he jumped from being to the side of Oswald to being in front of him, as we see in the Jackson photo. But, that put Leavelle out of the line of fire. So, even if the Shooter had gotten off a second shot, Leavelle would not have been hit. 

But why. in the Jackson photo, is the Shooter's middle finger sticking out, where it's probably the second joint that is on the trigger? It's because they were trying to make sure that the middle finger was noticed. Remember: it was just a tiny little piece of a large photo. If he had wrapped his middle finger around the trigger in the usual way, it's likely that no one would have noticed. People aren't that observant. 

So, this was their way of making sure that everyone noticed the middle finger. But, it couldn't have been during the actual shooting. Even though I don't think Oswald was shot in the garage, I know a shot went off. The trigger got pulled, and the gun discharged.  So, what we are seeing in the Jackson photo can't be real. It had to be staged and posed. And the same goes for the Beers photo. 

 The "iconic" Beers and Jackson photos are the only images that show the middle finger. The films don't show it. The two main films, which are NBC and KRLD, don't even show the hand, let alone the finger. The camera, in both cases, was behind the shooter.

It seems like the still photos were taken to deliberately show the middle finger, while the films were taken to deliberately not show it. Why would that be? It's because they weren't really going to have the shooter use his middle finger. But, for the still photos, there was no shot. They were staged. They were posed. And the means to do it. Conside the testimony of Dr. Fred Bieberdorf.

Dr. Bieberdorf said that the press started gathering in the basement very early. Remember that they were expecting a 10:00 Jail Transfer. He said that at 9:45, everyone was ordered out- including him, and he worked there. Reporters were told that they could wait in the press room on the 3rd floor. They weren't allowed back into the garage until shortly before it went down. The KRLD film starts about 12 minutes before, and you can see reporters and cameramen entering and taking positions.

So, why did they clear out the garage? There were two reasons. The first was to collect Ruby. He told the Warren Commissioners that he sent his money wire to Karen Carlin at 10:17. It was presumed to be a mistake on his part, but it was not a mistake. He remembered it correctly. I know there was paperwork showing 11:17, but that was phony. The first thing they did when they got Ruby upstairs was strip him to his underwear. They did that for two reasons: to give his suit to Bookhout to wear and to get his paperwork so that they could replace it. He could have left the paperwork in his car, so they also got his car keys, and they asked him where it was parked, and he told them. To their dismay, he brought his dog along. Who brings a dog to a killing?

Ruby said that all he could remember was going to the basement and being jumped by the cops. He said that he never had any thought to shoot Oswald and no memory of doing it. He said that he was so baffled as to why the police jumped him that he started saying, "What are you doing? You know me. I'm Jack Ruby, not some criminal." Note that the reporters said that the Shooter did NOT speak. But Jack Ruby did- at his melee.

But, the other thing they did during the evacuation of the garage was take the iconic photos. Which happened first? Collecting Ruby came first. But, it led to complications. Detectives McMillan and Harrison were both involved in hustling Ruby up to the 5th floor and getting him settled, stripping him to his underwear, etc. But, time was running out, and while they were doing that, the photo-shoot was proceeding in the basement.

They must have taken the Jackson photo first, and in the Jackson photo, you don't see McMillan or Harrison. McMillan they just left out. Who would notice? But, they had a surrogate for Blackie Harrison, and I believe it was FBI Agent James Hosty. I am referring to the guy smoking the cigar on the far right of the photo who looks like Leonid Brezhnev. They also didn't have the reporter Ike Pappas. But, McMillan did get back there in time for the Beers photo. However, for some reason, they had him stand sideways and look down. I can't explain that. And in the Beers photo, there is a Harrison figure, but you don't see his face. So, was that him or someone else? I don't know. They may have excluded Harrison's face just because he looked so different than the "Leonid Brezhnev" Harrison of the Jackson photo.

]But, the reason it took so much longer to process the Jackson photo was because they had a lot more alterations to make to it. It was supposed to be AFTER the shot, but there was no shot. And even during the televised spectacle, although there was a shot, there was no trauma. But, for the Jackson photo, they had to get the area of impact covered up so that the absence of trauma to Oswald and his clothing would be explained. So, that's how they came up with Oswald slapping his arm to his chest and Leavelle having his arm in tight. It was all to cover up the area of impact of the non-existent shot.

So, Dino's boys had a lot of work to do to the Jackson photo, and it may have taken them a while to come up with a solution. And that's why the Jackson photo wasn't published until many hours after the Beers photo. Remember the story: that the Beers photo was taken a fraction of a second before the shot, and the Jackson photo was taken a fraction of a second after the shot. Since the story of the Beers photo was that there was no trauma yet, all they had to add was a squiggle for Leavelle's arm.

But, I will leave you with the thought that they were probably whistling Dixie about the middle finger. They were thrilled that they had something that was distinctly Ruby that would identify the shooter as Ruby. But, it turned into a disaster for them when they found out that they got it wrong; that Ruby had lost his left index finger; not his right. So, it turned out that Ruby had no reason to use his middle finger. Oh shit. You hate it when that happens.

 This is awful. It is a video by John Armstrong in which he claims that the Dallas Police and Jack Ruby conspired together to kill Oswald, that members of the Dallas Police, such as Sergeant Patrick Dean, were involved in opening doors in the annex that enabled Ruby to reach the garage without going down the Main Street ramp. 

It's a long video; over 2 hours. And it, John claimed that Ruby was "ordered" to kill Oswald. But, by whom? Before, it was that the Mafia ordered Ruby to do it, but John didn't once mention the Mafia in this video. I assume that John meant that the Dallas Police ordered Ruby to do it. And John even said that Ruby didn't want to do it and tried to get out of it, that he made a call to the Police that he hoped would zilch the operation. 

But, exactly how could the Dallas Police "order" Ruby to shoot Oswald? What did they threaten to do to him if he refused? I'm not even going to propose something because there is no evidence of anything. 

So, why would Jack Ruby shoot Oswald just because the Dallas Police wanted him to? 

But, where this God-awful theory goes horribly wrong is over the fact that after the Dallas Police and Ruby supposedly conspired to kill Oswald that the Dallas Police proceeded not only to arrest Ruby but to testify against him at a trial in which he was being prosecuted for murder with the death penalty being sought. 

Now, let me make a very simple point: if the Dallas had forced Ruby to shoot Oswald on their order, then they would had to kill Ruby forthwith. Because: after doing that, how could they trust Ruby to keep his mouth shut? How could they be sure that his lawyers would not have pried the truth out of him? And even he tried to be stalwart, at first putting on an act and lying through his teeth, what if he lost wind? What if he just tired out? What if after 6 months of that, he just woke up one morning and said: "That's it. I've had it. I am going to take those guys down with me." Do you think those Dallas cops went to bed every night hoping and praying that Ruby kept his mouth shut?

If they had conspired with Ruby they would have had to kill him, and they would have killed him. The fact that Ruby lived until 1967 should tell you that he didn't know anything. 

And why WHY WHY would Dallas Police trust Jack Ruby to discharge a firearm in a cubbyhole packed with Dallas Police? Jack Ruby was a nincompoop. He was a dunce. Nobody respected him. He was an idiot. And as far as we know, Ruby had never fired that pistol once, not even to practice. If you were Jim Leavelle, would you want Jack Ruby shooting a bullet in your direction, with the only thing between you and the bullet being the skinny body of Oswald? 

Ruby said that he entered by way of the Main Street ramp. And he described what he saw when he got there. He said he saw Lt. Sam Rio Pierce parked at the top of the ramp with an officer on foot talking to him whom Ruby did not recognize. Do you realize that we have no evidence that Ruby ever lied? And it was Ruby who begged for a lie detector test or to be given truth serum. Why would he request those things? It's because he knew he had no intention of lying. And he passed the lie detector test. However, it was decided by the Warren Commission that because Ruby was declared to be psychotic, that the results would not be counted. But, I looked at his lie detector test, and he did say that he entered the garage thru the Main Street ramp without help. 

Some years ago, John Armstrong and I talked on the phone several times. And at that time, his conviction was that the Mafia ordered Ruby to kill Oswald. And he was unshakable about it. But now, he's switched it to the Dallas Police "ordering" Ruby to do it, although again, I'm clueless as to how they could have coerced him. 

I still wholeheartedly support John Armstrong's thesis that there were two Lee Harvey Oswalds, whose identities were merged when they were young boys. One was born in New Orleans as Lee Harvey Oswald, and the other (the Oswald of fame whom John refers to as "Harvey") was a Russian-speaking, post-WW2 orphan refugee, probably from Eastern Europe, who was extremely gifted with languages. And that's when the CIA's "Oswald Project" began when they merged the identities of the two boys, and it happened in New York City. 

However, I utterly denounce John's thesis about Jack Ruby and the Oswald shooting. John refuses to accept that Ruby was a completely witless patsy. And not just witless, but drugged and witless. There was a conspiracy, but it didn't involve Ruby. He had nothing to do with it. But, do you know who was in on it? Oswald. Oswald went along with the theater in the garage. 

Do you understand that it is impossible for Graves and Oswald not to be aware of "Ruby"? 

I put Ruby in quotes since he wasn't Ruby. But, peripheral vision- as well as other sensory input- would definitely have made them aware of the shooter. Yes, there was a conspiracy which involved the Dallas Police, the FBI, the Secret Service (who took custody of Marina before Oswald was shot, knowing that he would be shot). And I am very sure it started with Lyndon Baines Johnson. Fritz and his Stetson-wearing men weren't saints, but they weren't killers. They NEVER would have thought of doing it themselves. They were ordered to do it by Johnson. He was the Commander in Chief, and all but one of them were soldiers or seamen who fought in the war. I'm sure LBJ gave them his usual line, that there would be anarchy, that there might be war with the Soviet Union in which 100 million die, that there could be civil war; that there could be an economic collapse; that for the sake of the country and the Kennedy family, that everything had to be resolved that weekend.  

LBJ's henchman Cliff Carter was on the phone with Fritz 11 times on Friday alone, and that was before there were cell phones. 

Jack Ruby was not involved in the conspiracy to kill Oswald at all. He was completely bamboozled; tricked into believing that he had done it. And if you are going to quote Jack Ruby, quote that he told the Warren Commission that he sent the money-wire at 10:17, an hour before.  Because: that is what happened. They nabbed him an hour before. 

 Here is the link to John Armstrong's video, in which he is completely deluded. It's called "Oswald's pre-arranged murder" and yes, it was pre-arranged, but not by Jack Ruby. Poor Jack Ruby was just a witless moron who was played like an instrument. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFEb5G0zbqI