Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

David Von Pein

12:18 PM (15 minutes ago)

Yeah, everybody under the sun lied. Right, Ralph? Even the telephone
records are forged. Right?

You see, this is what happens when a person such as Ralph gets it in his
head that something happened that we all know could not have happened ---
such as somebody *other* than Jack Ruby shooting Lee Oswald. Via such a
cockeyed theory, it doesn't matter how many people (and phone companies)
Ralph has to call liars and "cover-up agents", he's going to do it. If
that number of liars reaches 5,000, it won't matter to Ralph, because he's
got an impossible theory to peddle---so, by God, there are going to be
5,000 liars in this case if that's what it takes to make his theory fly.

There's a term for that kind of "investigating" --- it's called
"Delusional". 

Ralph Cinque;

You don't know how to think, David Von Pein. The first and most crucial step in determining whether Ruby shot Oswald is not to consider anyone's lip-flapping, but to examine the images of the Shooter and confirm, by looking, that he was Jack Ruby. And when we try to do that, we fail. The Shooter, in his physicality, conflicts with Jack Ruby. He is too short to be Jack Ruby. His hair is not that of Jack Ruby. The back of his neck is not the same as Ruby's. And the length of his neck is not the same as Ruby's. And that establishes, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that he was not Jack Ruby. 

To deny what the eyes can see, now that is delusional.