Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Do you know how to look at evidence? Do you realize that there is a hierarchy, that some evidence trumps other evidence? Do you know that physical evidence trumps all the lip-flapping in the world? When we look closely at the features of the Garage Shooter and compare them to Jack Ruby on November 24, 1963, we can plainly see that they are different men. Do you realize that negates  and invalidates all other evidence that you might want to cite?

The Garage Shooter and Ruby had different hair. They had different necks, with the Garage shooter having a very short, clean neck, and Ruby having a longer and scruffier neck. It means they were different men, and there is nothing that can possibly override it. It doesn't matter what anybody said. It doesn't even matter what Ruby said, although the fact is what he said was that he had no thought of shooting Oswald and no memory of doing it, that he only accepted that he did it because Dallas Police told him that he did. This was a plot of the Dallas Police and the FBI, not only to kill Oswald and frame Ruby, but to convince him that he did it. And he was so impaired mentally that he believed them. 

If you have problem accepting this, it is only because it disturbs the comfortable world in which you've been living in which Ruby shot Oswald. Well, that is a phony world. It may be comfortable to you, but it isn't real. Jack Ruby was innocent. I am not suggesting it. I am telling you that it is as certain as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west. And what it takes on your part is: intellectual honesty, maturity, and being an adult. A is A. Jack Ruby was innocent. And what that means is that the whole nightmare of the JFK assassination was even worse than we thought, much worse.