Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Putting aside the SBT, think about unlikely it is that TWO shots would impact JFK so shallowly: the back shot and the throat shot. That is not the purpose of bullets. Their purpose is to cause lethal damage. 

And the idea that they shot him shallowly in the back just to establish a rear shooter (as one prominent researcher suggested) is stupid. They would have established that just as well by shooting him in the back of the head and killing him. There is no rational for a shallow shot to the back- except the one that I've given: to deliver a pharmaceutical that would immobilize and mentally incapacitate JFK.  

When you've got gunshots causing a scratch to the back and a scratch to the throat, something is wrong. And then when you throw in a complete, total, mental derangement, which scratches can't cause in the slightest, you know that something is super-wrong and super-different, that we're not in Kansas any more. 

Would you believe that Jim Fetzer is listening to a guy who claims the shot to the throat hit the hyoid bone and caused a spicule of bone to go flying upward- not through air, of course, but through tissue- into the brain? How could that have been missed at the autopsy? And how could a bullet with so little momentum impart so much more to a spicule of bone? 

And that takes us back to the reality of two very shallow shots causing a complete, total mental collapse. I don't understand how intelligent people can fail to see that IT DOESN'T ADD UP. We're talking about an equation here. 1 (shallow back shot) +1 (shallow throat shot) doesn't equal 8 (referring to the spasmodically bound and mentally deranged monstrosity that JFK became, as seen in the Zapruder film). Something is missing on the left side of the equation. A lot more was going on than two shallow shots.