Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I know we're a long way from November, but when it rolls around, I won't be surprised if the networks and the cable stations don't say one word about the JFK assassination. They don't want to talk about it any more.They don't want to defend the official story any more than they have to. I'm sure they realize that, among people who are keenly interested in the JFK assassination, that the vast majority dispute the official story. And not just dispute but mock it. 
And practically all of them dispute it by defending Oswald. There are really very few who dispute but keep Oswald's guilt in the picture. 

And, it is a very ridiculous picture, that of there being an organized plot, a conspiracy to kill Kennedy but with Oswald as shooter. 

That's because whether you think the plot was organized by the CIA or the Mafia or both, no one in his right mind would choose Lee Harvey Oswald to be the shooter- at least not that guy who worked at the TSBD. He was not an assassin. He was not a killer. He wasn't even a marksman. He was no more a marksman than I am a marksman. I have done more shooting in the last 3 years than Oswald did in the 3 years preceding the JFK assassination. 

There was no reason to think that he had the skill, the proficiency, the temperament, and the reliability to do it. Not only was there no reason to think it, there wasn't even the slightest basis to think it. It's so  ridiculous, it's comical. Just imagine the conversation:

Mafia Kingpin 1: So, we're going to kill that rat-bastard Kennedy. The question is: Who do we get to do it?

Mafia Kingpin 2: There's this guy. I heard tings about him. His name is Lee Harvey Oswald. 

Mafia Kingpin 1:  Yeah?  What've you heard?

Mafia Kingpin 2: Ah, he knows his way around a rifle. 

Mafia Kingpin 1: Yeah? Who's he worked for?

Mafia Kingpin 2: The Russians.

Mafia Kingpin 1: Ah, the Russians. You heard tings, huh?

Mafia Kingpin 2: Oh, lots of tings. Like, first, for instance, he constructs the crime scene like he was building a device, say, a radio. 

Mafia Kingpin 1: Building a radio? 

Mafia Kingpin 2:  Yeah. Building a radio. What's wrong with that?

Mafia Kingpin 1: Nuttin', I guess.

Mafia Kingpin 2: Then, he moves through the scene, dances through it really, like it was a dance at a marina.

Mafia Kingpin 1:  Dancing. Marina. I see where you're going with this.

Mafia Kingpin 2: You bet your sweet calzones you do. 

Mafia Kingpin 1: But, what's he been doing lately?

Mafia Kingpin 2: I hear he's been working for some bookmaker. At least, it has something to do with books. And get this: they call him "The Order-Filler."

Mafia Kingpin 1: The Order-Filler? Momma Mia! Santo Cielo!

Mafia Kingpin 2: Yeah, he fills your order, all right.

Mafia Kingpin 1: That settles it. We've got to get this guy Oswald. 

And that, of course, is Government Story #2, that Oswald did it working (without pay) for the Mafia. If you don't like their first story, that he was browsing through the newspaper on his lunch break at work, and when he saw that JFK was going to be motorcading through Dealey Plaza, he decided instantly to kill him, then try their second story. They don't care which one you believe so long as you place Oswald in the 6th floor window kachewing.

So that is really ridiculous, and it explains why when the HSCA proposed it in January 1979 and called for a new federal investigation, that Jimmy Carter didn't tell his Attorney General to step on the gas and get his Justice Department to tackle it.

But, Government Story #1, that Oswald did it alone and just for himself, is just as ridiculous since he had no motive whatsoever to kill Kennedy; since there is no evidence that he disliked Kennedy, that at the time his mind was on anything but getting his family back under his roof; that the claim that he owned a rifle that was secretly stored in the Paine garage- a conspiracy, if you will, between him and Marina, and dressed up with Michael Paine moving it around the garage wondering whether it was tent poles for camping, a military shovel, or something else, and when first asked if Oswald owned a rifle, Marina referred to the one he owned back in Russia. Add to that the fact that there is a photograph of Oswald  standing in the doorway  during the shooting- a photo that was comically altered trying to hide the fact that he was there, and the fact that he passed a paraffin test, you're left with nothing plausible to think that he did it. And then the whole story of him ordering the rifle, in which he disappeared from work for a long time even though he had to chronicle every minute of his work-day, and after a long walk to the post office to get a money order, he walked an equally long distance to a remote mailbox to drop it into (did I mention he was already at  the post office?)  and then he had to walk back to work, where his absence went unnoticed.  That's the scenario they're forcing us to swallow.

What's it all become? It's become a circus of the absurd. What's holding up the official story is the power of the State, the Leviathan State, and its minion media. 

When someone insults your intelligence, as the Official JFK Story does, it's time to, rhetorically speaking, spit in their eye. At least, if you have any self-respect you will. They've been shoveling this shit at us for nearly 57 years. It's time to say: no mas.