There is also a film version of Marguerite carrying Rachel into Parkland hospital, and it's very different. In it, there is no bearhugging of a tubular baby. Instead, she is holding the baby diagonally, and the baby is not in a cocoon. You can actually see the head of the baby. And there is no sign of any handbag.
How did Marguerite come to be holding a baby and a handbag in the still photo? Which did she pick up first? I can't imagine her going to pick up a baby while first holding a handbag. When you think about how fragile a 6 week old baby is, you probably want to devote both hands to carrying it.
And remember, she got out of car to do this. So, how did she wind up with both the baby and the handbag in her arms? Did someone help her? If so, then why didn't they carry the handbag for her? And what did she need the handbag for? Did she have to show ID? Why wouldn't she just leave the handbag in the car?
And regarding the still photo that we've been discussing, how was she going to put the baby down? She's going into the hospital to view the body of her dead son. So, was she going to just hold both the baby and the purse the whole time? What if she had to go to the bathroom? Nature calls. Isn't she a bit too overloaded there? Why would she get herself in that predicament?
And which of these is the real thing? They can't both be real. Either she had a handbag, or she didn't. Either she held the baby one way or she held it the other way. How do you reconcile the two? You don't. You weren't supposed to compare them. You weren't supposed to see them both at the same time.
It's all propaganda. The very idea of taking a 1 year, 9 month old to view the wretched body of her dead father is appalling. Who would do such a thing? The monsters who killed Kennedy, Tippit and Oswald, and then framed the poor Jack Ruby, gave it no thought when they staged this thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.