Now, I have done a detailed comparison of Doorman's shirt "pattern" and Lovelady's shirt pattern. You'll understand shortly why I put "pattern" in quotes.

So, let's look at my text notes. Notice that the upper right quadrant of his shirt (left to us) looks grainy but consistent. So, it has no pattern. Lovelady's posing shirt had flashy pattern all the way up to and including the collars. What about the other side of his shirt? We don't see a single box, but we do see some lines. There are two sets of double lines, white over black. But, if you look at Lovelady's shirt, the lines alternated between white/black and black/white. They didn't repeat; they alternated.

Then, on Doorman's sleeve, the lines are larger and more prominent. But, why would that be? We know where Altgens was, which was far away, and it's not as though Doorman's arm was any closer to Altgens’ camera and would therefore be captured larger. And notice it has diagonal lines. How did that happen? And then at the cuff, it has a very prominent black line and then a white line, but we don't see that on Lovelady's shirt. And again, Doorman was such a tiny object in a photo that was vast but small. The whole photo was only 3 inches by 2 inches. And Altgens focused his camera on the limo. He wasn't focused on the doorway. So, from that distance, would he have captured those two lines so sharply? I doubt it. I think they were added.

But, to be sure, I went back to the 10/2/64 LIFE magazine, which I have, because it is my proxy for the original Altgens photo. When I say the "original" I don't mean the photo that was taken because that got altered drastically. I just mean the photo that was originally published. This LIFE magazine image is the only one I can trust because I know no one has tampered with it since October 2, 1964. Nothing I could find online is trustworthy. That LIFE magazine image is now the alpha and the omega.  

And when we look at the 10/2/63 LIFE magazine, we see that it has no lines at all and no contrast at all. It is just a plain grainy grey. Those horizontal lines are completely absent.

The last mark I made is a question mark at the top left of Doorman's shirt; which is top right to us. There is nothing discernible there, but I put the question mark because I don't know if that is Doorman's shirt or the shirt of the other man wearing the tie. If you just look at Doorman, and ignore the other guy, it looks like Doorman's shirt. But, if you just look at the other guy and ignore Doorman, it looks like the his shirt. The two of them are merged together in such a way that they share content; where they both need the same part of the image to have context.  They look like conjoined twins.

Now, I realize that my adversaries won't be affected by this. They will brush it off and make snide remarks, as they always do. But, if you are an honest person with a clear, untainted and unbiased mind, then alarm bells should be going off in your head. The plaid shirt claim is and always was totally bogus. It was conjured up. The "pattern" of Doorman's shirt is not plaid. It was just Oswald's grainy Russian shirt. And we know from other evidence that Lovelady didn’t even wear a plaid shirt. He wore a short-sleeved striped one.

 

The image of Doorman from LIFE magazine is now the ONLY one I can trust. And that's because it doesn't require me to trust anyone else. You can buy your own 10/2/64 LIFE magazine on E-bay.
There are plenty of them, and they aren't expensive. I think I paid $!5, and that's for one in good condition.

The bottom line is that it really was Oswald in the doorway, and all the talk about a plaid shirt, and Gorilla Man Lovelady outside the TSBD, and another Lovelady at the desk in the squad room are like the loud, wailing cries of the bobcat, which we have in Texas and I have heard. The truth is what Oswald said and that his interrogators wrote down: that he ate lunch in the 1st floor lunch room during the lunch break, and then he went "out with Bill Shelley in front" to watch the Presidential parade.

 

 These are three images of Billy Lovelady in his short-sleeved, striped shirt. Start with the middle one, which was when he posed forthe FBI wearing the clothes he wore on 11/22. Then, look at the image on the right, where you can detect the light and dark stripes on the sleeve. I put RWR for red-white-red. And really the red was more like pink because it was a very old, faded shirt. And then on the right is him wearing that same shirt in the doorway, where they whited out the red stripes. So, they blackened out his face, and they whitened out the red stripes on his shirt. They did all that because he was Billy Lovelady. They were turning Oswald into Lovelady, and they couldn't have two Loveladys in the photo.

 The gauntness of Oswald's face really shows up in this image from the Midnight Press Conference, and you can see that gauntness on his face in the doorway too. Lovelady didn't have that gauntness. We know that the FBI weighed and measured Lovelady on February 29, 1964 and found him to be 5'8" 170 pounds. And he probably lost weight after the assassination because of all the stress. The gaunt face of the Man in the Doorway is the face of Lee Harvey Oswald.

 There is a very significant discrepancy between Vaughn's testimony and Ruby's. Vaughn said that when Pierce was coming up the ramp that he went to check on traffic, and upon seeing it was clear, he waved him through, and Pierce left without stopping. Vaughn was asked if he and Pierce exchanged words, and he said no. Ruby, on the other hand, said that when he got to the ramp, that Pierce was "parked"there, and that an officer on foot was talking to him. Ruby's exact words were:

"There was an officer talking--I don't know what rank he had--talking to a Sam Pierce in a car parked up on the curb."

Ruby knew Roy Vaughn. Vaughn went to the Carousel Club once, on duty. And another time he pulled Ruby over for a traffic violation but let me go with just a warning since he was a "friend of the department."

So, why didn't Ruby recognize Vaughn at the ramp? And why the discrepancy. It wasnt just Vaughn who said that Pierce didn't stop. Pierce also testified that he didn't stop and that Vaughn waved him through without saying anything.

Then, in his testimony, Ruby went on to say that he sent the money wire at 10:17. He was corrected right away by a Secret Service agent, and Ruby didn't argue. But, he was right; he did send it at 10:17.

The reason why Vaughn and Ruby told different stories is because they weren't there at the same time. Ruby was there first, and after he was nabbed and taken up to the 5th floor, where he was told that he shot Oswald, Vaughn was placed at the Main Street ramp.

Ruby never set eyes on Vaughn. There was a different officer there when Ruby got there. And it was the first of two exits for Pierce.

Ruby was being held on the 5th floor when the Garage Spectacle went down. And here's the NBC version of it. How could they cut it so close? How was it that the newscaster in Washington said "To Dallas, Texas and Tom Petit." and then instantly, Leavelle is entering the garage with Oswald through the corner door. How could they cut it so close? And notice the ridiculous curve in Leavelle's forearm. The forearm has long bones, and the only place it bends is at the elbow. So, how could it curve?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQpoHclNwTk

And how is it that no one was aware of the Shooter until after he fired the gun? Prior to that, no one looked at him or registered any awareness of him at all, even though he was a moving object. You can see in the KRLD footage that Graves shoved the Shooter, but he kept his head down so as not to look at him. And why wouldn't they cuff the Shooter immediately, right there in the garage? And what exactly were they doing when they guided him to the corner door? Were they pulling on him? Dragging him? And what was he doing? Was he resisting? And how did the cops know to do that? No one said anything. How did they all get the idea to do what they did without any direction?

Doesn't it seem choreographed? Doesn't it seem staged? It's nice that there are people here who admit that Dulles, Johnson, and Hoover were the prime movers in the killing of Kennedy. But, what about the killing of Oswald? Doesn't it appear that the Dallas Police were doing it? Wasn't this a dog and pony show that the Dallas Police were putting on? Yes it was.

 My adversaries keep glibly saying that, no, it's Lovelady. But, here is the top right collar and margin of Doorman's shirt, Oswald's shirt, and Lovelady's plaid shirt. I don't believe for a second that Lovelady wore that shirt that day. I am certain that he wore the short-sleeved red and white vertically striped shirt that he posed in for the FBI.

But, we are comparing stories and claims here, so let's compare the shirt that they claim he wore, the plaid one.

Can you see how well Doorman's and Oswald's match? And can you see that Lovelady's plaid shirt had pattern all the way to the collar? Who is the odd man out here? Are these people going to claim that the match is between Doorman and Lovelady, and that Oswald is the odd man out? It would be insane, but I don't put anything past them. And I think they will because they are more than willing to claim the absurd. That's how defiant they are.

 Look: it is IMPOSSIBLE for two men to look and dress this much alike. It wasn't an Elvis contest where everyone was trying to look and dress alike. It was just a random day at work. And Lovelady was shorter than Oswald but 40 pounds heavier. So, how could they look to be the same size?

This insanity of denying that it's Oswald in the doorway has gone on long enough, so stop it. These are images of the same man wearing the same clothes. The reason they look so much alike is because they are the same man.

For the sake of the soundness of your mind, stop denying that these are both Oswald.

And don't be spewing your crap, "But oh, he's wearing a plaid shirt." He is not. And it's past that. Don't you get it? It's over the threshold. It is the same man wearing the same clothes. Any lucid adult can see it, and I'm sure a lot of children could see it too.

 I vetted the Altgens photo by recreating it. On the left is my recreation. It was shot in late November at 12:30 PM with a professional photographer shooting from Altgens' location. 

So, lower left, it's supposed to be the black man, Carl Jones. I had the man face east only because that's what we see in the Altgens photo. But, in reality. Carl was facing west since the limo had already passed. Carl was leaning against the wall, but the actor couldn't do that because they installed a handrail there, several inches from the wall. What I'm doing there is reaching for him, and I am stretching and straining, because I want to show that he was nowhere near me. Then, notice that Black Hole Man has a head; his entire head is not in inky black shadow, as in the Altgens photo. The man below him is mimicking what his counterpart in the Altgens photo is doing, but that was more flim-flam. In reality, that man was standing there with both arms folded across his chest.

Black Tie Man, who is next to me, is not cutting off my shoulder, and he and are touching, so we could not be closer.  The sheared, slashed interface between Doorman and Black Tie Man in the Altgens photo is an abberation. 

I did not include the tiny little woman who was visoring her eyes with one hand because I'm not sure she was even there. And the same goes for the black ladies beause they are the same black ladies that are in Croft who were on Elm St. below the Obelisk. So what are they doing way up where they are in this photo? If you placed women where the Croft Ladies were on Elm and then shot the Altgens photo. you would not capture them. 

What I have proven here with this recreation is that Black Tie Man is fake; he was not there at all. The geometry between him and Doorman in the Altgens photo is a grotesque abomination. And Black Hole Man was there, but he had a face, which was the face of Billy Lovelady. But, since they were turning Oswald into Lovelady, they had to blacken out Lovelady's real face because they couldn't have two of him. 

There is absolutely no doubt that the Altgens doorway was massively altered, and this proves it. The scan of the Altgens Doorway was by Dennis Cimino, and it is the best we have.