The famous MacCammon photo at the theater, on the right, is supposed to be the only color image of Oswald from the JFK assassination. But, is it? For years, it only existed black and white, but then, supposedly, a color print of it was found at a Dallas photo lab. So, maybe it was colorized.
For instance, Oswald did not have red hair. But, he does in this photo. And, it's obvious that they doctored his hair by obscuring his hairline recession, which involved adding a tuft of hair that he didn't have. So, why did they do that? What purpose did it serve to lie about his hair?
But, the most glaring deception is his t-shirt. Oswald's t-shirt was torn and tattered, and the collar was stretched out of shape, as you can see on the left. It was nothing like what we see on the right. Not only did they give him a tight, round collar with no scruffiness, but they made it too high. A t-shirt collar doesn't go up to your Adam's apple like Oswald's does on the right.
What does all that photographic alteration tell us? It tells us that the U.S. government killed Kennedy. Altering a photo is a way of lying- a powerful way of lying. And in this case, what they were lying about was Oswald's guilt.
But, to this day, the media talks about this photo like it contains the secret to the Holy Grail. For instance, in 2013, TIME magazine got Gary Mack, the shill for the Sixth Floor Museum. to write an article about the photo entitled: An End to Conspiracy? Rare Photo of Lee Harvey Oswald’s Arrest Suggests Why He’s Guilty.
Mack recounted the official story of what happened in the theater, none of which can be trusted. Did Oswald really try to shoot Officer Nick McDonald? Oswald denied it, so whom should we believe? Did McDonald really jam his hand in the trigger space? That I don't believe for a second, and McDonald later retracted it. I presume that Oswald did have the pistol, but where did he get it? John Armstrong did a good job of showing that the mail-order from Seagate for the pistol was just as fraudulent as the mail-order from Klein's for the rifle. Someone must have given Oswald the pistol, and it was probably the same person who drove him to the theater. Yes, Oswald had to be driven to the theater because Butch Burroughs placed him there at 1:07, and Oswald could not have walked there from his boarding room in that amount of time. We can only speculate about who his driver was, but was it the cop who showed up there as reported by Earlene Roberts, his landlady? Do you realize that interrogators told us nothing about what Oswald said about how he got from his room to the theater? Why the omission? I have to think that what Oswald told them was fatal to the official story.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.