This is a presentation by Dr. Cyril
Wecht that was given at the Sixth Floor Museum in 2017. It was not an
interview, as most of their presentations are. He just spoke for an hour.
You know, of course, that the
Sixth Floor Museum is totally committed to the official story, and their entire
exhibit is designed to sell it. I don't know of any other disputers who have
been invited to speak there. And I really am surprised they let him speak so
independently. Maybe he insisted on it.
But, I can tell you this: that
the only reason they let him speak is because he doesn't dispute that Oswald
was a shooter. He insists that there had to be multiple shooters, including at
least one from the front. But, he does not defend Oswald, and he doesn't mind a bit thinking that Oswald was a shooter.
And that really is the crux of
the issue because if a disputer accepts Oswald as shooter- that's the most
important thing.
Think about the way they have
conducted JFK surveys: "Do you think Oswald was the lone gunman or do you
think he acted within a conspiracy?" Do you realize that that's like
saying "Heads I win; Tails you lose"? They don't really care if you
want to think that there were other shooters and a conspiracy. As long as you
keep Oswald up on the 6th floor pumping bullets into Kennedy, they are happy
campers. After all, he was actually standing in the doorway at the time. So, if
you support the most crucial lie in the case, which is that Oswald shot
Kennedy, you are no enemy; you are a friend.
That Oswald did it within a
conspiracy has long been Government Story #2. It's what the HSCA decreed in
1979. They came up with the ridiculous idea that Oswald was working for the
Mafia. Tell me: if you were the Mafia, and you were out to kill the President
of the United States, would you hire a guy who practically flunked his final
marksmen exam in the Marines, and then spent 3 years in Russia working at a
radio factory, where the only shooting he did was to occasionally go rabbit
hunting with a shotgun? And he reportedly stunk at that. And you can't even use
the word "hire" since there is no record of any money transfer from
the Mafia to Oswald. So, since Oswald wasn't paid by the Mafia to shoot
Kennedy, why did he do it? Why would he be willing to kill Kennedy for the
Mafia if he wasn't paid? Was he a complementary assassin? Did he just do it for the sport? So, the Mafia wanting Oswald is ridiculous, and him being
willing to do it for them is ridiculous. Everything about the "Oswald did
it for the Mafia" claim is ridiculous. It is patently absurd. You almost have
to be insane to believe it. Yet, it persists to this day.
But, even though Cyril Wecht
talks only about the ridiculousness of the Single Bullet Theory and nothing
else, he does a hell of a good job of it. In watching this, he made some points
that I was unaware of, for instance, of just how ridiculous the trajectory had to be- and it's even funnier than what Seinfeld did.
So, I encourage you to watch
this. It's historic that they invited him. I don't think Gary Mack would have
ever allowed it. Now, if they would only invite Larry Rivera on to show his
overlays of Oswald, Doorman, and Lovelady. Fat chance.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.