Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Oswald told investigators that he brought with him a brown paper bag that contained his lunch: a cheese sandwich and an apple from Mrs. Paine's house. You don't have to be Columbo to realize that that could be confirmed because there is refuse from it: the paper bag, the wax paper or other wrapping for the sandwich, and at the very least, the apple core. The question is: did Dallas Police go into the domino room and look for that evidence? They'd have to be awfully stupid not to. If they did, they surely found it. But then, they must have destroyed it. 

The official story has it that Oswald made a paper bag out of wrapping paper. It is not a very plausible story because without the know-how, it would hard to do. What if I asked you to do it right now? Could you do it? Do you have any idea what you would do? Even if you do, I presume you don't assume you could make a paper bag that looks and functions anything like a manufactured one. But, after the assassination, a Dallas detective paraded around outside the TSBD with a manufactured paper bag, claiming it was the one Oswald made out of wrapping paper.

Now come on, Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, that is not some wrapping paper that Oswald, or anyone else, turned into a bag. We're supposed to believe that Oswald made that in Ruth Paine's garage? That he had the paper stuffed in his jacket when he rode to Irving with Frazier on Thursday night? Nobody would even think of constructing a bag. They would just wrap the gun in the paper and tape it up. Why make a bag? And how, if that bag went through being stuffed with jagged rifle parts and then carried awkwardly by Oswald a long distance, could it have survived that ordeal without getting ripped? You know how easily paper tears. And when he was ready to assemble the rifle (using a dime as a screwdriver, according to the Warren Commission, without even knowing if besides lacking a screwdriver, he lacked a dime) why would he pour it all out? For something that long, why not just tear the paper? But, even if he did pour it out (theoretically, because  obviously, none of this is true; Oswald did not own a rifle) how could the bag not get torn? It tears easily. The whole story about the bag is complete nonsense. But, that manufactured bag that Detective Montgomery paraded around was never seen again. Notice that it was very wide at the bottom and very narrow at the top. The bag that they ended up going with was perfectly oblong. 

Now that is obviously not the same bag Montgomery brandished. It was a completely different shape and width. Montgomery's bag became an "inoperative" element. You know how when the U.S. Military changes its story about what happened in a war, they'll say that the previous account is now "inoperative." Well, similarly, Montgomery's bag became inoperative. 

This is all so very evil. The narrative that they came up with for Oswald's actions is preposterous, and it is very damning to the authorities. They were and are bloodied. The government and the media will continue to whitewash what happened, and with great discipline, they will squash any debate about it. But, it isn't going away, nor is the internet going away. The official story is so full of holes and absurdities that it can't withstand even a cursory look, never mind a rigorous one. It's dead in the water, and it can't be revived- not even superficially.  That's how bad the situation is for JFK Officialdom.  And that's why JFK truth, like 9/11 truth, is going to prevail.