Saturday, August 5, 2023

 I discredit Robert Groden. He is the source of this image of Lovelady in the squad room, and I assure you that Lovelady wasn't there. We have Lovelady's own testimony in which he told Joseph Ball that the last time he saw Oswald that day was at the TSBD. He said nothing about seeing Oswald at the PD.


But, the very physics of this image doesn't work. This was a caravan: a long line of police, reporters, and photographers,. They were following the big cop and Oswald the way the Israelites followed Moses. It was a long train of people. There was absolutely no room for Lovelady to be seated there. And there is no engagement, recognition, or awareness of anyone in the film with the Lovelady figure. No one ever looks at him. No one ever responds to him. When someone is in your way, you're going to look at them. He wasn't there.

And the size of the Lovelady figure is wrong; he's too small. But hey, that's all they had room for when they dropped him in there. It is the image of evil. Creating that phony image was akin to blowing Kennedy's brain out. It was the act of aiding and abetting ruthless, monstrous killers.
Then, Robert Groden agreed to do the devilish work of the HSCA in claiming that Doorman was Lovelady. Just think: if you were determined to find out the identity of a mysterious man, and you know he was one of two men, what would you do? You would put images of each of the two men alongside the disputed image and see which one matched better. Robert Groden didn't do that. In his photo analysis that was published, he never put an image of Oswald alongside Doorman. In fact, he didn't show an image of Oswald at all. He showed several disparate images of Lovelady, but none of Oswald. All he showed of Oswald was his shirt, except it wasn't even Oswald's shirt. It was the phony shirt the Warren Commission claimed was Oswald's shirt.
Just imagine if he had published this collage of Oswald and Doorman, where we can see the excellent match of the man and the clothing.



And beyond the particulars, it has the the same look, the same "physiognomy" which is a term that is used to refer to the haunting impression that we get from someone's face. So, it is the same eyes, the same nose, the same mouth, the same chin, the same slender build, but it's also the same look, the same stare, and the same eminence of person. The very idea that Billy Lovelady could have resembled Oswald in all those respects is repugnant! We understand how unique and individual, i.e. one-of-a-kind, that each and every person is. And any honest soul is going to intuitively recognize that Oswald and Doorman were the same person. Yet, Robert Groden has fought it all his life and to this day. He even attended one of Larry Rivera's lectures in which he presented his overlays of Oswald and Doorman, and even that didn't move Groden. He is indurated; inflexible; and un-open to considering that his career stance is and always has been dead wrong.
This goes way over the threshold of certainty. It is categorical that Doorman was Oswald standing in the doorway during the assassination of President Kennedy. Anyone and everyone who won't admit it, at this juncture, is just being stubborn, and they deserve no respect.
It's time to end this. It's been 60 years of lies, and that's enough. It was Oswald in the doorway, and that is beyond dispute or doubt.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.