Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 All right, this settles it: once and for all. On the left is Jack Ruby. It was March 1964 at his trial. I realize that it was several months after the murder of Oswald. However, the length of Ruby's neck was the same, and it's obvious that he had a much longer and less burly neck than the Garage Shooter.

And Ruby's hair wasn't exactly the same but it was mostly the same as it was in late November. And you can plainly see that he just got an ordinary men's haircut, where the hair is tapered in back. However, there is nothing ordinary about the hair of the Garage Shooter. He had long curls in back that fell neatly in place in a very orderly and perfectly horizontal way. He's not exhibiting an ordinary men's haircut at all. He is exhibiting a very stylized and deliberately groomed look.. He is obviously not a guy who got ordinary men's haircuts. And frankly, I think he's wearing a wig. The two presentations are lightyears apart. They could not be more dissimilar.

It's staring us in the face that Jack Ruby was NOT the Garage Shooter, and that should settle it for all reasonable people. Anyone who won't admit that these are two different men is adopting dementia as a lifestyle. It's time to admit that Ruby was not the Garage Shooter- if only for the sake of preserving our rational minds. Let us not walk off the plank into the sea of dementia just out of stubborness. Jack Ruby was innocent.

And to the blood-soaked Kennedy-killers and fake Oswald defenders, of which there are many, it's over for you.