Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

You think the Mafia ordered Ruby to kill Oswald? When and how? If they did, it had to have been that weekend. They certainly didn't order him to kill Oswald before JFK was killed. So, when during that weekend did they meet with Ruby and tell him to kill Oswald?

Here is a timeline of everything Jack Ruby did that weekend. It includes everyone he talked to; every phone call he made or received; every place he went to; and every person with whom he interacted.

https://www.kenrahn.com/JFK/Issues_and_evidence/Jack_Ruby/Timeline_of_Ruby.html

And everything on that list is sourced. So, where does it say that he met with some Mafia kingpin who ordered him to kill Oswald?

It never happened. So, why do people keep saying it? It's because it's an urban legend that the perpetrators fueled. They realized beforehand that many people were not going to accept the lone-nut story, and they wanted to give them an alternate story that would work just as well for them. And the alternate story was that the Mafia did it.

Many people claim that there were Mafia shooters. I don't claim to know. It's not an area that I have probed. But, if it’s true, they certainly didn't need to do that. They certainly could have come up with JFK-shooters without going to the Mafia. So, if they did that, it was just to involve the Mafia, so that they could blame the whole thing on them.

And you know that that’s what the HSCA settled on, that the Mafia did it. And it's ridiculous because they kept Oswald as shooter. Why would the Mafia want LHO as shooter when he almost flunked his last marksman exam in the Marines in 1959, and then he did no shooting in Russia for 3 years except to occasionally go rabbit-hunting with a shotgun. And then after returning to the US in June 1962, he did no shooting at all, except, supposedly taking a pot-shot at General Walker, which he didn't do. Why would the Mafia think that a guy who spent 3 years soldering transistor radios together in Minsk would be the best assassin for JFK? I can just hear it now: one Mafia don telling another: "I heard tings about dis Oswald guy."

But, let's get back to Ruby, supposedly, shooting Oswald. If you wanted to confirm it, where would you start? What would you look at first? The answer is: YOU WOULD COMPARE IMAGES OF THE SHOOTER TO IMAGES OF RUBY AND MAKE SURE THEY MATCH.

We are talking a human being with his own unique DNA. There can't be any discrepancies between Ruby and the Shooter if they were the same man. And if there are discrepancies, it means Ruby didn't do it- regardless of anything else. There is no counter to it. There is nothing that trumps it. If the comparison shows different men, then that’s it; it's over. They were different men, and Ruby was innocent.

So, on the left is Ruby at the Midnight Press Conference and on the right is the Garage Shooter from the Jackson photo. THEY DON'T EVEN LOOK ALIKE, LET ALONE LOOK IDENTICAL. Ruby on the left had a long face that was angular and jutting, while the Shooter had a very round face. Ruby had a long neck, while the Shooter had the shortest neck I have ever seen. It was almost like his head was sitting on his shoulders, with practically no neck at all. And his neck was very burly. It didn't taper. It was thick.

And the Shooter was pudgy like the PillsburyDoughboy while Ruby was quite lean. And their hair was nothing alike either. The Shooter had long hair in back that curled up at the bottom. And I tell you that it was a wig. You don't see a single hair growing out of his head. It looks matted like a wig.

THEY’RE NOT THE SAME MAN, and there is no blah-blah-blah for it. You just have to admit that they are not the same man or else you don't have an honest bone in your body.

And this is a brand-new collage. I just made it today. I have never put these two images together before. So, don't tell me I am reposting something because I'm not.

Ruby was innocent, and every mature and honest person who looks at this will admit it.