Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Allan G. Johnson

Jun 9

- show quoted text -

   Getting back to the original post concerning Oswald being in the
doorway of the TSBD at the time of the shooting, if anyone believes that,
then can they explain why Oswald would LIE about being in the lunchroom at
the time?  I still haven't heard a REASONABLE explanation for that, other
than Fritz and the Police lied about what Oswald said. 

Ralph Cinque:

Oswald never said he was in the lunch room during the shooting. That was a lie that Will Fritz told the Warren Commission. Fritz said that Oswald said that he was eating lunch with other employees at the time of the shots, but Oswald never said that. Furthermore, wouldn't it have been prudent for the WC to ask Fritz who the other employees were who ate lunch with Oswald? How is that not relevant? But, of course, they they didn't ask, and Fritz didn't tell. The whole thing was theater.  

Oswald told Fritz that he was "out with Bill Shelley in front" during the shooting. But, Fritz didn't want to tell that to the WC because he knew very well that that was not what they wanted to hear. He was a team player, and he could read the handwriting on the wall as to what was expected of him.  So, he twisted Oswald's words around. Oswald said he ate lunch in the 1st floor lunch room well BEFORE the assassination. He ate alone, but there were other employees around at the time whom he named. They were Junior Jarman and Harold Norman. And that's the real story.

Oswald was DEFINITELY in the doorway during the shooting, and there is NO PLACE ELSE he could have been, not even theoretically. 

http://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2015/06/anyone-who-claims-to-be-oswald-defender.html

Do you understand that it's over? That it is futile to deny this?