I am pretty much done using any of the versions without the thumbprint because I don't trust them. I don't presume that they show what the photo really looked like.
This is like the Altgens photo. Nobody knows what the original Altgens photo looked like, and I think the odds are very great that it was destroyed. Maybe not immediately, but soon thereafter, they destroyed it. What was the alternative? To put it in a vault and have to guard it 24/7 for eternity?
It's the same way with the Moorman photo.
So, don't anybody use any of the versions of the Moorman photo that are missing the thumbprint to make a point. I do not accept them. I do not recognize them as valid. I refuse to regard them as evidence.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.