Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Alex Foyle

2:28 PM (1 hour ago)

On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 1:34:50 AM

 The sucker bait is Earl Golz's ridiculous series of articles in the late 1970s

Ralph Cinque:

"The sucker bait is Earl Golz's ridiculous series of articles in the late 1970s."

Well, I don't know about his other articles, but his Carolyn Arnold article is pure bull. She most certainly knew about her prior statements because her 1964 statement she signed. And, it is preposterous to think that Special Agent Harrison pulled the idea of her seeing Oswald between the glass door and the double doors from out his ass. What she tried to claim in 1978- that she saw Oswald in the 2nd floor lunch room eating lunch at 12:25- was impossible because Oswald definitely ate in the first floor lunch room, as he always did.  That's always as in without exception. 

What do you do with somebody who completely revises her story 5600 days later? You ignore her. Nobody gets to do that. 

Shortly before the slaughter, Carolyn Arnold saw Oswald at the doorway on 11/22/63. It is as much a part of the official record as any other testimony, and it always will be. We don't need it because we can clearly see Oswald in the doorway, and it is absolute. Still, it's nice to have it.