Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 This gif shows you that Jackie really did try to coax JFK's arm down. She first placed her right hand on his upper arm at frame 246. Then, at frame 254, she has her left hand on his forearm. And after that she continues to coax his arm down. 

I think they were both involved. I think she was coaxing his arm down, and he was responding to that by leaning towards her. I don't think he relaxed his arm. I think it was more of a tipping action. But, I do think that in a very visceral way he was responding to her. Mentally, he was gone. He was in a state of utter confusion and derangement. And that's why I say he was responding to her viscerally; not consciously and not with any focus. 

And then, as they got to Jean Hill and Mary Moorman, Jackie raised her right elbow, which created leverage. And it stayed like that, with her right elbow high, until he was shot at 313. The last frame I have in this gif is 312.

And I can't claim to know how focused she was either, but I do know that, on some level, she was intent on getting him to put his arm down. 

Without a doubt, her right hand was on his upper arm, and her left hand was on his forearm. 

So, how does that compare with the image of them in Altgens? It shows both her hands on him, but they are on this long wand-like arm. 

But, she didn't have both hands on him until 254. 

But, it's obvoius that in Altgens, he is still in the throes of panic, and it is more consistent with frame 230.

Can you see that JFK in Altgens correlates with 230? That's a match. 

And Altgens said that he took his picture right when he heard the shot. And this was very soon after the shot. And notice that in both, JFK isn't focused on her at all. He is totally absorbed in what he's doing.  He's in a panic. He can't breathe. He has to clear his airway. And he hasn't done it yet. 

Those correlate well in terms of HIM. But, what about HER? In 230 she isn't touching hin at all; not with either hand. But, in Altgens, she has both hands on him. So, what do you make of that? 

What you should make of it is that JFK and Jackie in the Altgens photo is bogus imagery. It isn't real. It's art. It's crude, crappy art, but still art. And that crude, crappy art replaced whatever was really captured. 

So, what was captured? Well, let's take Altgens at his word. He said he snapped the shudder right when he heard the first shot. The first shot was the shot that hit JFK in the back high on the hill. It would have shown a startled look on his face; a reaction that something weird had just happened to him, but he wasn't sure what. And they couldn't let the world see that because that shot was supposed to stay under the radar. It was the shot that, officially, never happened. 

So, they made the decision to change it to a latter time and a different place, lower on the hill when JFK was shot in the throat. 

But, they were never going to say that he was shot in the throat. The plan all along was to say that he was struck in the back with a bullet (he was not; it was an ice dart) and that the "bullet" exited through his throat. 

In other words, the Single Bullet Theory was baked in the cake before 11/22. It's just that they weren't planning to include Connally. They had to add him after he was accidentally shot. 

This proves that the imagery of JFK and Jackie in Altgens is totally  bogus and inconsistent with the Zapruder film. They do not correlate. Those arrogant bastards thought they could rewrite the story in the photo, pushing it later in time and lower on the hill.