Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 I know that when you first hear that JFK was hit with an ice dart that contained a nerve agent that it's hard to believe. So, I am writing this concise statement about it. 

First, I already proved that the freeway sign in the Zapruder film is bogus, and if you haven't seen my video about it, here is the link. You can watch it afterwards. Finish reading this first. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiJMrM_QKyc

So, the "story" of the Zapruder film is that JFK was fine and dandy until he disappeared behind the enormous and very concealing freeway sign, and he was shot behind the sign, and when he emerged his mind was gone; he was mute; he was totally helpless; and his muscles were acting very weirdly as they spasmed and the spasming spread. 

So, that much we can see. But, what happened to him behind that sign to cause all those effects. Exactly what trauma did he receive? 

Well, the official story, of course, has it that he received the Single Bullet that went through him. But, that story is a lie. I'm not going to go into here, but if the Single Bullet Theory is a lie, then the default is that JFK experienced just what Dr. Humes and the Bethesda doctors found and described: a very shallow wound in his back. And he also experienced the wound in his throat that Dr. Perry found at Parkland Hospital in Dallas. And he also experienced the massive head wound that was described very differently by the Bethesda doctors than it was described by the Parkland doctors. I won't go into that because that came later. So, at the time that JFK emerged from behind the freeway sign with all his weirdness, he had just experienced the shallow back wound that damaged no vital tissue, and the throat wound of Dr. Perry, and that is all.  

Those wounds could not have destroyed JFK's mind, as seen in the Zapruder film, nor could they have caused the bizarre neuro-muscular manifestations that he exhibited in the Zapruder film. 

So, physical trauma did not cause the effects on him that we see in the Z-film. 

But, let's return to the back wound. If it was as shallow as the Bethesda doctors reported, the missile could not have been a metal bullet because a metal bullet could not have stopped that short. When you consider the velocity and momentum of the bullet, and the amount of resistance needed to dissipiate all its energy in order to stop it, an inch and a half of soft tissue in JFK's back was not enough to do that; to stop it. But, if the missile were ice, ice is unstable, and it bursts easily. So, it could stop that short, not because of resistance acting on the bullet, in the classical physics sense, but because the ice burst and was instantly gone. 

But, the bottom line is that we know that in the 1950s, the CIA developed such a gun that could do that: deliver an ice dart containing one or more toxins, and causing a very shallow wound. It was called the CIA heart attack gun:

https://www.maloriesadventures.com/blog/the-c-i-a-heart-attack-gun-the-weapon-that-leaves-no-trace

Not only was the gun found, but stockpiles of shellfish toxin (a neurotoxin) and cobra venom (another neurotoxin) were found. CIA director William Colby answered questions about it to the Church Committee, and when asked if the gun was ever used on anyone, Colby said no. He actually had the nerve to claim that it was intended as a suicide weapon that agents could use to off themselves- if necessary. And that is ridiculous. Weren't potassium cyanide tablets better and more efficient for that purpose? But, Colby was no fool. He certainly wasn't going to say that the CIA shot people with it, including JFK. He'd have been killed if he said that, and I believe he was killed anyway.  

So, the ice gun with intoxicants was definitely in the possession of the CIA in 1963, and they had developed it.

All that's left is to present the evidence for JFK's intoxication, which comes mainly from what we see in the Zapruder film. First: his weird muscular dyskinesia that could only have been drug-induced, not trauma-induced. 

Then, there was also the testimonial evidence, particularly from Jackie Kennedy that JFK never spoke. The last thing he said in his life was in response to Nellie Connally before anything happened. She said to him that you certainly can't say that the people of Dallas didn't turn out for you, and he said, "I certanily can't." That was on Elm Street shortly before he was shot, and he never said anything after he was shot. His muteness was NOT due to the throat shot. It damaged coils on the left side of his trachea, but it did not damage his larynx. His voice would have sounded different, but he could have spoken. But, he did not speak, nor did he attempt to speak, and it was due to his complete mental collapse. 

Again: JFK's complete mental collapse cannot be ascribed to his physical trauma to that point. And his neuromuscular derangement, so apparent in the Zapruder film, cannot be attributed to physical trauma either. And that leaves poisoning as the only plausible explanation for those phenomena. And the means to shoot those toxins into him definitely existed in 1963, and with direct ties to the CIA.