Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 The story of the Zapruder film is that JFK was fine and dandy until he disappeared behind the sign. Then it happened behind the sign, which was like the magician’s curtain.

But, JFK was already shot before he disappeared behind the sign, and you can see it in the film. You just have to look closely.

In frame 188, JFK is looking at the spectators and waving. He seems to be OK. But, notice that Jackie is already starting to turn towards him. Now, compare it to frame 206, in which she is turned all the way towards him. She has totally stopped waving and engaging with spectators, and she is focused solely on him. And JFK is not waving and engaging with spectators anymore either. He is pointed straight ahead, and it looks like he has his hand over his face. He didn’t do that. It’s a smudge- one that they added. They did it because he undoubtedly had a distraught look on his face because of what was happening to him- internally.  

Why is Jackie looking at him? Because: she knows that something is wrong; terribly wrong. And she said so in her testimony. She said she was looking left (working the crowd) when she heard “terrible noises.” So, she looked to her right to check on her husband, and she saw that he had a “quizzical” look on his face. That’s quizzical as in: “What is going on inside of me?” Then, in the very next sentence, it went to her seeing a piece of his skull fly off.  

Wait. That doesn’t make sense. His skull flying off was the last thing that happened. It was after frame 313.  How could it go from her first turning to look at him to seeing his head flying off? What about everything in-between?  

It has been admitted the Jackie’s testimony was edited. This is from Google AI:

“Yes, Jackie Kennedy’s testimony was edited by the Warren Commission before publication. The Commission stated they removed "brief" and "irrelevant" portions of her testimony, primarily for reasons of taste and to exclude specific, graphic descriptions of the President's wounds”

Are they kidding? They published graphic images of the President’s wounds. Considering the gravity of this, and the importance of finding out exactly what happened, it is an outrage that they edited her testimony. They did it to change her story; to conform it to the official story.

Jackie said that JFK never spoke. They published that. But, they didn’t ask her if she spoke to him. I tell you that she must have. She must have asked him what was wrong. How could she not?  And don’t anybody say that he couldn’t talk because he was shot in the throat because his larynx was unaffected. Plus, if he couldn’t talk, he would have tried to communicate another way- by gesturing, pointing, etc. But, he didn’t do that, and he didn’t do anything. He did nothing to save himself or protect anyone else. He just sat there like a sitting duck. DON’T YOU UNDERSTAND THAT HIS MIND WAS GONE?

 Yet, at that point, he had suffered no brain damage. All he had was a shallow wound in his back that damaged no vital tissue, and he had a puncture wound in his throat that damaged his trachea some, but did not damage his brain. And yet, he lost his mind? HE LOST HIS MIND DUE TO POISONING, NOT TRAUMA.

It was because of what they shot into him at frame 190. Sprague and Cutler said he was shot at frame 190. But, it wasn’t a bullet. A bullet could not have stopped that short. He was shot in the back, just to the right of the 3^rd thoracic vertebra, with a drug-laced ice flechette. And he rode down the hill that way, not waving, not engaging; but undergoing severe internal changes that worsened by the second.

Then, when he got to the freeway sign, he was shot in the throat by Umbrella Man. It was a very close shot. Umbrella Man was just a few feet away from JFK at the time. And the limo was stopped so that he could do it.

The throat shot obstructed JFK’s breathing. In a panic, he raised his hands to deal with it. It may have been just a bolus of blood, and he cleared it by coughing once with his hand over his mouth. But then, he couldn’t put his arms down. His arms were stuck- frozen in spasm- from the nerve agent that was shot into him.

Jackie didn’t know what happened. She only knew that he was very sick. She placed her hands on his left arm and tried to coax it down. You can see her doing that right here:

 https://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2026/02/this-is-jackie-leaning-into-jfks-arm.html  

She got his arm down a little, but his spasms and mental collapse continued. One can only imagine what she said to him. Then he took the fatal head shot which effectively killed him. It took some time for all his vital activity to stop, but he was gone, and the Parkland doctors knew it.

Now, I realize that when you first hear that he was shot with a nerve agent, you recoil. You pull back. It sounds farfetched. It sounds like something from a Mission Impossible movie. I get that. But, it is a known fact that the CIA, in the 1950s, developed a gun that shot an ice dart into people, delivering a nerve agent. You can watch the Church hearing about it right now, where CIA Director William Colby testified about it. If you’re an honest person, who really seeks the truth, you’ll watch it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fomOeIhEWDg

So, the poison ice dart is NOT farfetched. You know now that it existed and at that time. Nerve agents work by blocking an enzyme called cholinesterase. Cholinesterase is what turns off acetylcholine, which is the neurotransmitter that tells muscles to contract. Without cholinesterase, muscle contractions keep going. They don’t cease. They continue, and it’s painful. We can see that that was happening to Kennedy; that his muscles were seizing up.

 Knowing that the CIA developed a poison ice dart weapon in the 1950s is a game-changer. It makes the nerve agent hypothesis not just possible and plausible, but compelling. It’s the only thing that explains what we see in the film.

Don’t tell me it was because a bullet went through his neck because a bullet did NOT go through his neck. Why do you think they wouldn’t let Humes dissect Kennedy? Just think about how easy it would have been to find out if the back wound and the throat wound were connected. They wouldn’t let him do it because they knew darn well that those wounds were not connected.

The killing of Kennedy was a State murder followed by 62 years of State lies. But, we can put a stop to it. The most monstrous crime of the 20^th century needs to be exposed, and we can expose it. It’s not going to take money or power or access; just grass-roots unity online. That's all we need. We can do this. So, let's do it.