Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 If the imagery of JFK and Jackie in the Altgens photo is real, then it should correspond to some Zapruder frame without contradiction. I know that Zapruder shot from the north side of Elm, while Altgens was in the street on the south side of Elm. So, there was an angular difference. However, our minds can account for that. With that considered, there still has to be complete consistency.

So, what frame does it correspond to? The urban legend is that it corresponds to 255, and one guy, Rob Mastroianni, proposed it as the matching frame. And I responded by pointing out the discrepancies between Altgens and 255, which you can see below. And I could have said more, but I ran out of room.

And I can do that for any Zapruder frame. That's because there is no Zapruder frame that corresponds to what we see in Altgens. That's because what we see in Altgens isn't real. It is art. Crude, crappy, JFK art.

But, you have to say which Zapruder frame Altgens corresponds to, because if you don't, then your claim is empty.

So, here is the slap-down of 255. If anyone else wants to take a shot, go ahead. You can't win. I can slap down every frame. That's because there is no frame that corresponds to it.