Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backes, your cognitive ability is so weak that you are totally oblivious to your own contradictions. Total obedience and total ideological agreement? Is that the best you got, you blood-soaked Kennedy-killer? Get something into your blood-soaked brain: there can be no collaboration between Oswald defenders and Oswald accusers. It's not my rule. It's reality's rule. It's called being in ideological agreement WITH YOURSELF!

There is a  difference between "framing" and "lying" which I understand but which you apparently don't. Lying is when you just wag your lips and say false things. Framing involves taking actions to create false, phony evidence to incriminate someone. When they (presumably) claimed to find a bus transfer ticket on Oswald, that wasn't just lying; it was framing. The physical object, the ticket, made it framing. 

They didn't need McWatters transfer book and his punch marker to authenticate the bus transfer because it didn't need authenticating. Oswald said he rode the bus. Oswald said he got the transfer. It wasn't even in dispute until assholes like you came along. 

Today, in 2015, if someone commits a crime and escapes by bus and gets a transfer, do police confiscate the transfer book of the driver and his punch device? Have you ever heard of any police department doing that? 

And, what did I tell you about misquoting me? I never said they spent 5 hours altering the Altgens photo. What I said is that there was 5 hours from the time it was taken (12:30 Central) to the time that it was first shown to the public by Walter Cronkite (6:30 Eastern). That's where the 5 hours came from. How much of that time was spent altering it I do not know. 

And what the Hell is wrong with you, Backes? We're talking about a specific thing here. So, you go off on a diatribe about numerous other elements of the assassination? Anything and everything you can think of? What, are you trying to create a distraction? Are you unable to focus on one thing? Or, are you putting on a demonstration? Well, I am not following suit. I am not going to start arguing with you about whether or not it was the wrong rifle. Stop being so scatterbrained. 

Furthermore, in the midst of all your verbal diarrhea, you didn't even address the one thing that was relevant, which is: how could they have obtained a bus transfer ticket for Oswald to admit into evidence at 4:00 when his first interrogation didn't end until a few minutes before? 

How'd they get that ticket? Dallas Police had their first contact with Cecil McWatters when his bus passed the DPD at 6 PM. Yet, they entered the ticket into evidence at 4 PM. The ticket had the right date, Nov 22. It had the appropriate time 1:00. It had a ticket number. So, did Dallas Police put an Oswald-double on the bus to get that ticket from McWatters? Or, did they get it in some other way?  It's your frickin' story, so you're the one who has to say. I'm not going to speculate because I think it's all bull shit.

But, did you go into that? No. Did you lay it all out how this was done? Did you present the evidence that Oswald was picked up in a private car, what you're basing that belief on? No. Not a word. Instead, you put on the Joe Backes Show, waxing on and on, vomiting up all the rote stuff you've been spewing for years that has nothing to do with what we are talking about. What the Hell is wrong with you??????? 

You think I'm a putz for not thinking that the Dallas Police faked physical evidence? Well, what physical evidence are you talking about, Backes? I've already said I don't think they faked the transfer ticket. But, are you talking about anything else? And remember that we are talking specifically about the Dallas PD, here. We're not talking about the CIA, and we're not talking about the plotters. We're talking specifically about the Dallas Police Department. 

Furthermore, we talking about the faking of physical evidence on a departmental basis, which I deny. Do you know the difference? I'll spell it out for you: If a Dallas policeman, such as Roscoe White, did something corrupt, planted fake evidence, or whatever, it doesn't mean that the Dallas Police Department did it. If he was involved with the plotters, then he was acting criminally on their behalf, but not on behalf of the DPD. 

I agree with Jim Marrs who has said, repeatedly and recently, that there were very few people in the DPD who were involved, and there was no chain of command coming from Chief Jesse Curre on down to do anything illegal that day. It wasn't the policy of the DPD. Framing Oswald for riding a bus and cab ride would have required the complicity of a lot of police officers. There is no reason to think any such thing happened. 

And if Oswald didn't ride the bus and cab, why did he say he did? Why did he lie? And how did he come up with the exact cab fare of $.85? If this was a conspiracy, it must have been the first time in police history that the suspect and the police department decided, independently of each other, to lie about the exact same thing in the exact same way. 

You're stupid, Backes. You're a dolt. And don't be having any more scatterbrain eruptions. It only makes you look worse.