Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Let's continue analyzing Larry Peters.

I am going to post again what Jack White wrote about him, and then I'll post Larry's response to Jack.

"Mr. Peters" refuses to reveal his identity, his occupation, his
JFK research credentials, his address, or any personal data.
He posts all hours of the day and night from the GMT time
zone, so we are led to believe he resides in GB, but that
is not necessarily true, since he could be posting from Langley
Virginia.

Unfortunately, this forum has no rules of conduct. Too bad.

I will no longer read ANY of his postings nor reply to ANY of
them. He has made himself a non-entity by his actions.

Jack White is not the issue here. Learning the truth about the
JFK coup is. In a phone conversation once, the late Col.
L.Fetcher Prouty once told me, "You are the researcher which
the CIA fears most. They will try their best to discredit you
because your photo research is easily understood by the
average person, and that is a threat to them."

Bye bye, Mr. Peters, WHOEVER you may be.

Jack White

Mr. White - I am growing tired of your childlike tantrum throwing. If I was agreeing with your studies, you would care less about who I am or if I reside in Europe or not. If you alteration believers spent more time on addressing the evidence and less time whining about things that are irrelevant to your claims being made about photo and film alteration, then possibly people would have a chance to learn something based on which presentation of the evidence is the more detailed and makes the most sense. The fact is that you are seeing your mistakes being brought out into the open and you don't like it. If you felt that I was in error, then you would sit back and be enjoying my making a fool of myself. As a matter of fact, that is exactly what you did when you made some cracks about my analyzing abilities over your Bond Vs. Skaggs post, but you soon found out that it was you who was in error. John Simkin had the right idea as to how this site could best serve the students he is trying to reach, but his approach will not work if people like yourself just sit back and require that only the simple questions be asked. The JFK assassination was not a simple matter that has a simple answer. If you want to take your ball and go home, then fine ... just quit making up excuses for doing it. For the record: I am middle aged - have spent 25 years studying the JFK assassination - I live in the state of Washington - I like long walks, hiking, fishing and contemporary music - I like animals - I don't smoke - I snore when I sleep - my favorite food is pizza and my favorite color is blue. Now does that information make the details of my postings seem more or less accurate to anyone?

I take by it your saying "by his actions" - that means my offering detailed explanations showing how a film or photo alteration claim was in error instead of keeping things simple.

I certainly agree with your statement {Jack White is not the issue here. Learning the truth about the JFK coup is} even if hearing you saying it rings rather hollow after the remarks you made above in your opening post. Telling people that the most important thing is learning the truth about JFK's murder doesn't mean as much if your replies are not focused on the evidence being presented, but rather more your concerns over my wake/sleep cycle or at what time of the day I'm able to share evidence with this forum. The way I see it .. If I have misrepresented the evidence, then I expect someone to bring it to my attention because as you stated - trying to learn the truth about the JFK assassination should be the real issue here.

However, Jack pointed out that this man took the deliberate, conscious, scheming action of distorting his time zone to London time when he was really in Washington state. That goes way beyond having an erratic sleep/wake cycle. It shows a consciousness of wanting to hide the fact that he was living in the area of the Pacific time zone- big as it is. And the whole tone on Education Forum was that members were supposed to be honest about themselves, with no bull-shitting. So, Larry did a devious thing by distorting his time zone that certainly went against the spirit of the forum. Simply put: he lied about himself. 

So, if he lied about his time zone, which is to say his location, what else could he have been lying about?  Did he really live in Washington state? I don't know, but I'll assume that he did. And, that's because it would have been an awfully bold-faced lie if he didn't. 

We shall continue analyzing Larry Peters.