Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I just realized something: in his narrative given to William Westfield, Jack Ruby accounted for his actions on Friday afternoon- the time he was reportedly at the DPD stalking Oswald. The exact time was 2:00, and we know that because of the big goofy clock/coat rack in the squad room which said 2:00. But, Ruby said nothing about going to the DPD on Friday afternoon. Here is what he said:

Do you see anything about him going to the DPD? No, you don't. And there is no basis to claim that Ruby lied about it. He didn't lie about anything. And he loved to talk. It poured out of him like a fountain. He had no secrets. He was asked in his lie detector test if he went to the DPD on Friday afternoon, and he said he didn't. And what it means is that this guy is not Jack Ruby:

It's easy enough to see that he's not Jack Ruby. He's got a hook nose, which Ruby didn't have. He's extremely bald, even compared to Ruby. And what's worse is: it's not even Friday afternoon. It was the brilliant Amy Joyce who noticed that the guy in front of him is reading the Saturday newspaper. But, this is often presented as an image of Jack Ruby stalking Oswald on Friday afternoon. But, he is NOT Jack Ruby, and Ruby did NOT go to the DPD on Friday afternoon, as he always maintained. 

But now, think about this: if there was a Jack Ruby double (and there was) then Ruby must have been framed because people don't just have doubles. You know there were Oswald doubles and that he was framed. So, the very existence of a Jack Ruby double tells you that he was framed; set up; patsied.  Jack Ruby was INNOCENT, but he was just too stupid to know it. He was bamboozled him into thinking that he shot Oswald.