Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This image does not ring true to me. I don't know what really happened. But, alarm bells go off for me when I look at this. 

First, what preceded this in the video was Floyd being led across the street. We don't have any video  of how he wound up on the ground and partly underneath a police car. 

But, kneeling on someone's neck? They don't even allow that in the UFC, and they allow a lot of brutal stuff there. The neck is one of the most delicate parts of the body, full of vital organs with very little protection. So, I don't know how Derek Chauvin could have done this, and once he started doing it, I don't know how he could look away. How do you take your eyes off the guy knowing that the slightest bit too much pressure and he's a goner?

But, I don't get George Floyd either. Why would he lie there and let it happen? I understand that  you are supposed to obey police, but not when they do something that is clearly illegal  like this. Your instinct to survive would kick in. Nobody would just lie there and take that. But, I realize that his eyes appear to be closed, so maybe he was already out of it; incapacitated. But, how did it get to this point? Because George was a big, muscular man; a giant. We're told that the kneeling went on for 8 minutes. So why didn't he resist before this? The whole image is too docile and too relaxed for what it purports. 

Again, I don't know what happened. I only know that they were walking George across the street, and then it cuts to this.  What happened in-between, and how did it get to this? Because: this image, by itself, does not ring true to me. It is not credible. 

Now, please consider what I am about to say very carefully. I have been saying for years that they could not let Lee Harvey Oswald go to trial, that he would have crucified them, and by them, I mean the Dallas PD and the FBI. And not only could they not let him go to trial: they couldn't even let him speak to a lawyer, and he asked for one 13 times in public that we know of. And then, lo and behold, Jack Ruby came along and saved the Dallas PD and the FBI from a fate worth than death. Or did he? Maybe that was them acting, saving themselves. 

Fast forward to 2019 and Jeffrey Epstein. They couldn't let him go to trial either. He could have done damage, severe damage, to famous people, important persons of respectability and leadership in our society. That could not be allowed. So even though people were predicting it and making jokes about it before it happened, he conveniently hung himself in prison. And I haven't conducted a poll, but I suspect that the suicide of Jeffrey Epstein is the most categorically ridiculed and rejected news story of all time. Tens of millions don't believe it in this country alone. Maybe over 100 million. Worldwide, it may be over a billion.

But, getting back to JFK and Oswald, I am honored to be friends with the great truth-speaking attorney Vincent Salandria, and Vince has stated many times that when he started suspecting that the story being spewed about JFK's death was a croft of crap, his very next thought was that Oswald's life was in danger- that they couldn't let him live. And Vince told people in his life that if Oswald dies in custody, then all bets are off, that we need to run for the hills because his death will mean that the sons of bitches are lying to us. Now, that's my wording, not his, but it's the gist of what Vince said.

So, following Vince's lead, and knowing what happened to Oswald and what happened to Epstein, the question is: can they allow Derek Chauvin to go to trial? And, I'm not defending him. I don't know what happened.  I'm just saying that there are some very baffling things about what they claim happened, and the picture doesn't help. And if anything were to happen to Derek Chauvin in custody, such as, that he died in a fight with another inmate, or he died trying to escape, or he hung himself in jail, then all bets are off, and we need to run to the hills because the sons of bitches are lying to us. The story they are telling us so far should not be settling to anybody. Not to anybody, and no matter what their skin color. At the very least, we are not being told the complete story, and I don't know how anyone can argue with that. And please know that when it comes to race, I am not against anybody.  I am not the least bit racist, and I recoil at the idea.