Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Jim Fetzer is at it again. Now, he's claiming that Charlie touching his nose was a signal to start the fake assassination stunt. But, isn't that something that people do sometimes? 

So, all that blood we saw pouring out of his neck was in a tank on Charlie's back? That is so ridiculous. Watch this video of him throwing MAGA  hats into the crowd at the beginning. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNbjNXngj8Q

So, this is him heading to sit down. There is no tank of blood on his back. He is wearing a bullet-proof vest; a flat bullet-proof vest. 

You can't compress water. There is no way that all that blood that poured out of his neck later came from a tank on his back. THERE WAS NO TANK ON HIS BACK. It was just a bullet-proof vest.

Now, I do NOT support the official story about Tyler Robinson shooting him. But, I don't doubt that Charlie Kirk is dead. There is NO WAY he would have participated in faking his own death. To do what? Hide in seclusion for the rest of his life? And what, his family too? He was willing to do that to them?  

Jesus, Mary, and Joseph! What the hell is wrong with people to think such a thing?  

This is the shooter on the roof and then starting to lower himself a few seconds later. Why does he look like a stick man on the left? Look at his legs. He looks like a cartoon. 

What is the techno-babble reason for that appearance? You admit that it's laughable, right? 

So, I have my own problems with the official story, but make no mistake: Charlie Kirk is dead. He NEVER would have participated in faking his death, and it is an offensive and fiendishly so to suggest that he would have. FETZER AND COMPANY ARE TRASHING HIM. 

You saw what happened to Jimmy Kimmel for saying what he did; his show got  cancelled indefinitely. But, to claim that Charlie Kirk faked his own death? That is 10x worse. Make it 100x worse. 

Charlie Kirk is gone. He was assassinated. Who did it remains to be determined; both who fired the shot and who was behind the whole plot. But, it was definitely a plot to kill him, not put him in seclusion for 60 years. And let's just say that the unraveling of the truth is going  to be even bigger than the Epstein case.  

If Fetzer were a brighter man, he would realize that the people behind Charlie's murder couldn't be more pleased with Jim's noise about Charlie having faked his own death. Unwittingly, Fetzer is working for them. He's just too dumb to realize that he's doing their bidding. And that's  because any time you challenge a false narrative with another false  narrative, you are doing the bidding of the perpetrators.