Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

So, who is who in this photo? Let's analyze it from a journalistic perspective. And I did take a course in journalism in college.

It starts with "Dallas Ranger Captain Bob Crowder" but I think that was a mistake. They meant Texas Ranger. But, why did they start with him? It's because Crowder was the most famous, the most celebrated person in the photo. He is also the most central figure in the photo.

The guy on the left edge isn't even all there. He is partially missing. He is cut off. You wouldn't start with him. You would start with the guy who is most visible, most captured and most featured; who is most in the spotlight.

I tell you, emphatically, that no one would describe that image by starting with the guy who is on the edge and partially cut off.

Now, let's look at the way it is divided. There are two units there. There is the unit of Crowder, alone, and there is the unit of Clements and Bookhout together. In the photo, there is one man who is standing alone and uncoupled, and there are two men who are apart from him and very close to each other. There is no doubt who Clements is; he is the short man in the middle. But, who is he paired with? Who is he closer to? He is much closer to the decrepit old man on the edge.

Again: 2 units, one being Crowder; the other being the two FBI agents. It's very clear that the division, the distinction, and the separation of the units is between the central figure and the other two.

And again I point to the stance of the central figure, which was Crowder's stance, with shoulders back and squared, a very strong stance. Crowder was a tough guy. He was the symbol of the Texas Rangers. He stood that way because displaying strength was like his emblem. But, James Bookhout was an FBI lawyer. He wasn't an Elliot Ness kind of FBI agent.

Very few men stand like that, and there is no reason to think that James Bookhout did. But, Bob Crowder was a hero. He was a larger- than-life kind of guy. And we have other photos of him standing like that.

I'd bet that Bookhout was standing there on the left side. And remember: he was short. So, it was easy to place that tall, decrepit guy right over him.

There is no doubt that the tall, vigorous-looking guy was Bob Crowder. However, since they were turning him into Bookhout, they altered his image. They fattened his cheeks, since Bookhout had fat cheeks. They tampered with his nose and with his hair. Bob Crowder was totally grey by then. He was 68 years old. But, even a 54 year old man has a lot of grey. The only way a 54 year old man is going to have jet black hair is if he dies it. So, that isn't realistic either. It was a blatant attempt to create a false image of James Bookhout, and they did it because Bookhout was the Garage Shooter of Oswald, and there were no images of him from the JFK assassination. And I'm the one who pointed out that there were no images of Bookhout. I did that in 2013.

So, for 50 years, no JFK researcher noticed that there were no images of James Bookhout from the JFK assassination, even though he followed Oswald around like his shadow.

And I'll remind you that the claimed photo of Bookhout in Fritz' office enjoying his pipe on 11/22/63 (a much shorter man) was discredited by the Chief Archivist of the United States, Colleen Joy Shogan, and I thank her for that.

The fact is that there are no images of James Bookhout from the JFK assassination or thereafter for the rest of his life. The only images of him are his school yearbook photos, which were doctored. I am calling on Constable Jim Bookhout to release family photos of his father, for the sake of truth and justice.