Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

My point, Backes, is that Doorman definitely had an arm, and it should be there. It should be right where we see the arm that's there.  So, if that's not Doorman's arm, where is his arm? 

And if that's a black man's arm who has his sleeve rolled up, then how come the tone of his skin is exactly the same as the tone of the fabric? There is no difference whatsoever. What is the likelihood of that human skin would reproduce exactly the same "color" as a shirt? And why would black skin show all the black and white contrast that we see there? Look how different it is from the black skin of Roy Lewis's face. 

You are out of your mind. That is, obviously, one mass of fabric. It is the same medium. It is not a black man's exposed skin. He was not wearing a shirt the same color as his skin, with the same reflective properties, etc.  You're such an idiot, Backes.