Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Hey, Robin. Remember what I said? That Backes would never concede that I used Tri-X film even after all that I provided? You came around, not because you wanted to, but because facts are facts.

Well, just as I predicted, Backes is still denying that I used Tri-X film. He refuses to believe that there was more than one camera involved.  He thinks that because there are some color pictures that there could not also have been a camera using Tri-X film.

Robin, I presume that you get it now that there were two cameras involved and three sets of images: color and black/white images from the digital camera and then the Tri-X black and white images from the old 35 mm, which produced results such as this:

  
Backes must have seen what you put up:

But, Backes doesn't care. He doesn't know when to quit.  He is incapable of admitting that he was wrong. He just digs himself in, deeper and deeper, denying something that is so plainly obvious that it's insane to deny it. But again, he just doesn't care. For goodness sake, it says KODAK 400TX which stands for Tri-X and it's obviously a shot of the doorway looking up Elm Street. It is truly insane to continue to deny that I used Tri-X film, but Backes is doing just that. 

I wonder if anyone else will publicly support him on this. I rather doubt it. I think it's going to be just him.