Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Tri-X only comes in black and white, Backass. And the color photos I displayed were taken with a digital camera.

The professional photographer had two cameras: an old 35 mm with the Tri-X  film and a modern digital camera which took color pictures. What is so hard to understand about that? I've only said it about a 100X. 

Two cameras, Backes. One man with two cameras. He shot with one. He put it down. He picked up the other. He shot with it. What is so hard to understand about that? And then you say:

But for years, you said I didn't use Tri-X film, that I lied. And now I'm showing you this:

So now, are you willing to admit that you were wrong? How about apologizing for all those accusations? You should start by doing that before making demands. But no, not you. You just segue right into demanding that I turn the Tri-X film- which you denied even existed- over to somebody else. 

Well, whose film is it, Backes? Who paid for the project? Who conceived of the project? Who organized the project? Who flew to Dallas twice to do it? And now you have the audacity, the nerve to demand that I turn my property over to someone else? Property that you swore didn't even exist? 

It's Tri-X film, Backes, which any rational, untwisted person can see. And you are a laughing stock for having denied it all those years. 

What about you, Robin Unger? Are you now willing to admit that it is indeed Tri-X film? That I wasn't lying? What do you think that KODAK 400 TX stands for?