Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Fact: all arguments for it not being Oswald in the doorway have been thoroughly destroyed. 

The Warren Commission witnesses who said it was Lovelady? That was by design. But, Billy Lovelady was NOT one of them. He never said that Doorman was himself. He, supposedly, drew an arrow to himself in the picture, but the one and only arrow pointing to Doorman is Frazier's arrow. So, Lovelady was a conflicting witness.

The Warren Commission couldn't allow anyone to say that it was Oswald in the doorway. If they did, it would have completely destroyed the Warren Report. The Warren Report would have exonerated Oswald. And that's true no matter how lowly the person was.  

So, if anyone had tried to say he saw Oswald in the doorway, that person was pounced on and threatened to the nth degree.  There was an "atmosphere of intimidation" after the assassination, and that's putting it mildly. 

The only two physical attributes of Doorman that have ever been likened to Lovelady are his "plaid" shirt and his hairline. But, Doorman's shirt is not plaid. It is not the least bit plaid. It is nowhere plaid. The variations on it are due to the mottled effect of light reflection, and you can see it similarly on Oswald's shirt.

  That mottling is one of the reasons I like this collage so much.

And regarding the hairlines, yes, they match, but it's because they moved Lovelady's hairline over from when he was young.

The image on the left is from the 1950s and probably about 1957, judging by how young he looks. We have it from Roy Lewis that at the time of the assassination, Lovelady's hair was practically all gone on top. You know beyond doubt that he was a rapidly balding young man, so how could he have the exact same hairline in 1963 that he had in 1957? It's not just the hairline that is exactly the same but the length of the hair, the cut of the hair, the style of the hair. This is impossible. Stop the nonsense. 

So, what's left to defend Lovelady in the doorway? There is nothing left. It is totally without support. The only thing left is the stubbornness of bloodied people who refuse to admit that it was Oswald in the doorway.  They just don't want it to be Oswald in the doorway.

Well, we don't always get what we want, and they are not going to get what they want. Oswald in the doorway is an established fact, and it has reached the point of insanity to deny it. And, it is certainly going to lead the way forward in the dissemination of JFK truth.