Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

So, in the Zapruder film, it appears that JFK was behind the freeway sign when he was struck, but that was actually faked to prevent us from seeing the impact of the shots. And I suppose they had to do it because JFK was hit in the back at the level of T3 and he was also hit in the throat just below the Adam's apple. They would go on to claim that it was all one shot, that he was hit at the level of T1 and that it traversed his neck and came out his throat, that the tiny little opening at the front of his throat that Parkland doctors found was an entrance wound. 

But, the theory that it was all due to one traversing bullet from the rear did not occur right away. It was only when they ran out of bullets that they resorted to it. They settled on 3 shots, and when they later discovered that there was a shot that missed, they had to account for two wounds on Kennedy's body and 4 wounds on Connally's body, and they only had one bullet left. So, they said that that bullet caused all 6 wounds, traversing the bodies of two men. 

But, what did it look like when the real thing happened? I could only speculate, but we can be pretty sure that it didn't look like one bullet going through 2 men and causing 6 wounds. So, they couldn't let us see it. They had to cover it up. 

And who knows when they covered it up because remember that the Zapruder film wasn't shown to the country until Geraldo Rivera showed it on tv in 1975, 12 years later. And who knows how much work was done it over those 12 years. That's a long time, so they had plenty of time.  

So, they couldn't let us see that shooting go down, hence, they covered it up with the freeway sign. And I should have realized long ago that it was way too convenient that that sign just happened to be there preventing us from seeing it. 

So, they used the sign, the idea of the sign, and created a visual obstruction. But, let's return to the Altgens photo. There the scene inside the limo was changed; it was faked; either because Kennedy hadn't been shot yet, OR he was shot but for the exact same reason as the Zapruder film, they didn't want us to see what really transpired. Which of those two is more likely? 

First, look at this. This is Charles Brehm from the Zapruder film. Notice that he is not at the curb. You can see a little curb there, and that tells you where the curb is, and he was not close to it. He was back on the grass. 

The road wasn't really curved where Brehm was. It's covered below, and it looks pretty straight.  

On the far left, you can see the platform that Zapruder stood on. So, you come directly across the street, and that was where Mary was. And up from her was Brehm. Surely we are seeing the spot where Brehm was, and it wasn't curved. Now look at the Altgens photo.

It appears that Brehm is standing just below the curve in the road. But, if you watch the Zapruder film, the road seems straight for quite a ways above him. It doesn't seem like he was that close to the curve. And is that his shadow hanging out in the street? And who is that above him on the grass? Is that the short woman with the taller man from Zapruder? They are the only ones possible, as I see it. 

But, notice that their shadows are mostly going east, and so is Brehm's and his son's and Babushka Lady's. 

What is going on there? Is he wearing a white belt? That certainly is unusual. I don't consider that a good match at all to this guy.

In Zapruder, he's clapping with his hands in front of his lower chest/upper abdomen. And if you watch it, he seems to be doing it quite modestly, without a lot of movement. This, in comparison, looks like a much more boisterous clap.

In Altgens, he is clapping with his hands high, about face level. In fact, they're too high. His hands are high enough to obstruct his vision of what he is trying to see. It makes more sense for him to be clapping the way he does in Zapruder- without obstructing his visual field. 

So, the long and short of it is that I am doubting that Charles Brehm in the Altgens photo is real. I think they may have put him in there. And if so, it was to establish a later time and lower location for when the photo was taken. It is commonly said that Altgens corresponds to Z255, but that's based on what is happening in the back seat of the limo in Altgens, and as I told you, that is fake. Therefore, all bets are off concerning Z255. In fact, it can't be Z255 because it if was, then they'd have had it and would not have had to simulate it. So, it was not Z255, and it had to be before Z255.