Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Another mass shooting this Fourth of July, in Chicago, 6 dead, 24 wounded. And of course, the death toll may go up. 

How could there be this much evil among Americans? I think there are multiple reasons for it, but one of them is that the evil goes to the very top, to the very institutions that run our society. I mean political institutions, educational institutions, certainly media institutions, and you may as well throw in religious institutions as well. 

And the JFK assassination is a striking example of the evil I am talking about. It is patently and transparently clear that Oswald didn't shoot Kennedy. For one thing, he was standing in the doorway at the time, and we have multiple images of him there. But, we also have him saying that he was out front and citing someone who was there, Bill Shelley. How could he know that Shelley was there unless he was there himself? And it's also true that if you try to place Oswald anywhere else but the doorway, it fails. It falls apart. Do you want to try to claim that he was in the 2nd floor lunch room? It doesn't work because Oswald only got to the 2nd floor lunch room a few seconds before Officer Marrion Baker did. So, if Oswald got there at say 12:31.5 how could he have been there at 12:30? That would necessitate claiming that he was there, that he got up and left, and then he decided to come back. You can't just pull that from out your ass and plop it down. There is no basis to claim it. Period.  

And even without knowing that Oswald was in the doorway during the shooting, we know he could not possibly have shot Kennedy.  

For one thing, we know that there is no chance that he ordered the rifle from Chicago. For him to have ordered it, it would mean that he would have had to put the envelope in a letter box on a street in Dallas and have it be delivered to Klein's Sporting Goods the very next day. 

Now, you know that mail delivery stinks, and I mean today. But, today, they have computers and everything is digitalized and scanned, and they have robotic machines that move the mail, all of which they didn't have in 1963. A letter mailed in Dallas today couldn't possibly be delivered in Chicago the next day. I suppose if you paid for overnight delivery, it could, but that didn't exist in 1963. The chance that it happened in 1963 is absolute zero. 

And since it was a P.O. Box, and the rifle was too big to fit in it, he would have had to go to the counter to get it. Why would they turn over a rifle addressed to A. Hidell to Lee Harvey Oswald? How did he explain it? It's not OK to have multiple identities. Talk about a red flag. And that was true then as it is today. 

Oswald said that he didn't own a rifle. And when first asked about it, Marina said that he used to own a rifle (back in Russia) but it got sold. She would not have referenced that if she knew that he currently owned a rifle. 

Now, I realize, that eventually, Marina came around to telling the tale that was ingrained into her, but you need to realize that she became the Stepford Wife of the FBI. Marina Oswald was MK-ULTRA'd.  Through a combination of mind control techniques that included drugs, indoctrination, probably hypnosis, and even sexual manipulation, she was made to say the things the Warren Commission wanted to hear. But, the bottom line is that if she knew that Oswald currently owned a rifle, she would have said so on November 22, 1963, and she did not. 

But, there are more reasons yet to know that Oswald didn't kill Kennedy. He passed his paraffin test, which means that he didn't fire a gun. They claim that his nitrate test was positive, but he handled books which have ink, so nitrates could have gotten on his hands from that. And the so-called fingerprint evidence- a partial here, a partial there, and a palm print found on the butt of the rifle but only after he was dead? That all came from the FBI, but the Dallas Police tested for prints before them and said they found nothing. 

And then the very fact that Oswald died the way he did. That was arranged by the Dallas Police and the FBI, who manipulated Jack Ruby to show up, although he was not in the garage at the time of the spectacle. That was FBI Agent James Bookhout masquerading as him. But, the point is that the reason they needed Oswald dead pronto was because if he didn't die, then he would have had to be given a lawyer. They just couldn't put it off any longer, not with him clamoring about it to the world. And if he talked to a lawyer, even once, it would have been all over for them. 

All these things are painfully obvious, yet, our leaders and our institutions continue to protect the real killers of President Kennedy, as they continue to push on us the lie that Oswald did it. Anyone who says that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy is practicing evil. Anyone who does it is pumping bullets into the body of John F. Kennedy every time they say it. 

So yes, our society is falling apart, and we are returning to savagery. But, you could say that that savagery began on November 22, 1963. It's as good a day to pick as any. Please share this.