Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This is the letter that is used to prove that Ruby worked for Nixon, however, notice that it includes a zip code. 

The year was 1947, and zip codes did not start until 1960. The letter is fake. The whole narrative is fake. A phony life story was concocted about Ruby, and it was done to hide the fact that he was totally innocent. He wasn't in the garage at 11:20. 

When he testified to the Warren Commissioner, he said that he sent the wire at Western Union at 10:15. Right away, a Secret Service agent from California who wasn't even in the state of Texas on 11/24/63 politely corrected him, "No, Jack..." (they always patronized him by calling him Jack) "...you sent it at 11:15."  But, Ruby was right. He said in his narrative that he arose early on November 24. He said he got dressed, ate some breakfast, and then left for Western Union. It makes sense that he would get there by 10:00. What made no sense was that there would be a crowd gathered at the Main Street ramp since it was an incoming ramp. Who were they waiting to see coming in? Nobody. They were there just to be a magnet for him. 

In his narrative, Ruby wrote that he took twice his usual number of "diet pills" (amphetamines) thar morning, plus some other pills. But, he didn't say why he did it or how it came about. Who would write like that? Nobody would. But, his narrative was edited. 

He took his beloved dog Sheba with him. His intention was to leave her with someone at the Carousel Club after he finished at Western Union. Why would he do that if he intended to shoot Oswald? He had no thought whatsoever to shoot Oswald. The whole thing and the whole narrative about his life was a lie. 

They could not let Oswald see a lawyer because it would have not only established his innocence but exposed what they did to him to frame him. But, it was earlier in 1963 that the Supreme Court declared that the "habeus corpus" rights within the Constitution include the right to a lawyer. They were in trouble, and the only way out was to kill Oswald. 

But, they did NOT collaborate with Ruby. Nobody opened a door for him. There was no collusion between him and them. If there were, they would have had to kill him. Ruby didn't know anything. Ruby was out of it mentally. He was deranged. Think about this: On Sunday afternoon when Fritz got back from the hospital, he was questioned by reporters, and one of the things he said was that Ruby was talking to his attorney, "which was his right." Well, if it was Ruby's right, it was Oswald's right. And Oswald screamed for an attorney. Ruby never did. He never asked for one. They gave him one. They just told him that his attorney was there. That attorney, Tom Howard, wasn't even Ruby's attorney at the time. Years before, he had done some legal work for Ruby, but he wasn't currently Ruby's attorney. And Tom Howard was there on Friday night and was seen talking to Fritz. Isn't that weird? Howard lived in Houston, but he went to Dallas for the Midnight Press Conference? Doesn't that seem like a stretch? 

There was a conspiracy to kill Oswald and frame Ruby, but Ruby wasn't in on it. How could Ruby be involved in a plot that sought to put him in the electric chair? And when you look at his state of mind and his total incompetence, how could Dallas Police allow Jack Ruby to shoot a gun in a crowded garage?

Look: the idea that Ruby shot Oswald is just plain stupid. Wake up! Snap out of it. And if you just look closely at the shooter, you can see he is not Ruby. These two are not the same man.