Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Dr. Kevin Barrett asked me to respond to a patron of his who bashed the Altgens Doorman assertion and then endorsed the Prayer Man idea. Here is my response:

It is difficult to talk about this without imagery because we are talking about a photograph and what it shows. But, what it shows is the Man in the Doorway with the face, the features, the expression, and even the stance of Lee Harvey Oswald. And then, as a separate and distinct element, it shows that he is wearing the clothes of Lee Harvey Oswald. It is patently absurd to claim that Oswald and Lovelady not only looked a lot alike, but dressed the same. 

The claim that Oswald was Prayer Man is preposterous. It's beyond preposterous. it is based on total fabrication; which is to say, based on nothing. So, who was Prayer Man? He was nobody. There was no Prayer Man. The whole clip is completely bogus. It's supposed to be from the Darnell film, but the Darnell film can be viewed on Youtube, and if you go view it, you'll see that the Prayer Man clip isn't in it. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCHTdTF7YbE&t=114s

So, since the Prayer Man clip is not in the Darnell film, why believe it is from the Darnell film? 

Second, the Prayer Man clip was supposed to be filmed just 10 seconds after the last shot, which was the fatal head shot, but the people in the Prayer Man clip are unrecognizable. All of the known, proven occupants of the doorway are gone, and all these strangers are there. Who are they? Who knows? They aren't real.   

The Prayer Man hypothesis was put forward to distract from and to ridicule the Altgens Doorman hypothesis, which has been proven beyond the slightest shadow of a doubt. It's as certain that it was Oswald in the doorway as it was Christ on the Cross. The likeness of the man and the clothing are too great for it not to be him. 

Same man. Same clothes. Doorman can't not be him, Oswald.