Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 The Croft photo is a naked revelation of conspiracy

The Croft photo was taken high on the hill. If you look at the top right corner of the photo, you can see the TSBD, that orange building. So, this was long before Kennedy was first hit, according to official lore. But, was it? 

Start with Jackie. She has her head turned towards the crowd. She was supposed to be smiling and waving at them, but she is neither smiling nor waving. Her arm is down;  her face looks glum. Why, if all was well at this point? And, as a former chiropractor, I ask: why is her head turned so much? Adults don't have that much cervical rotation. Kids do, but not adults. Turn your own head to the left. How far does it go before it wants to stop? You don't get more than 45 degrees, do you? And if you're old, it could well be less than 45 degrees. Beyond that, it's strain. There, she seems to be rotated, what, about 80 degrees? It's too much, even for her in her 30s. and look at the size of her head, how huge it is compared to his. She was a little closer to the camera but not much. Here is a shot that is proportioned correctly.

 

That head of hers must have been pasted on there to cover up the fact that she was looking at him at the time. And why is her hair sticking out? Look how it angles. It wasn't doing that. It isn't natural. Nobody's hair does that. What would make it do that? There was a wave there, but not an acute angle. 

So, they poofed out her hair there because they needed more coverage- of him. He was reacting to being shot there. He had been shot in the back. So, maybe his mouth was open in shock. And notice that his eye is missing. There is just a line there. He probably had a startled look in his eyes that they couldn't let us see. 

The photo that followed is the Betzner photo, which shows nothing of the Kennedys because of the guy in the way. 

How hard would it have been for Betzner to step to his right to avoid that guy blocking his view? Not hard at all. It's very likely that that guy was added to keep us from seeing the Kennedys. So, let's move on to the next one, the Willis photo.

So, the red line is pointing to JFK. We can't trust anything about that image. What we're seeing of his head there could have been paint. What I want you to notice is that she is not working her side of the street; rather she is turned and looking in his direction. We are seeing the back of her head, and her head is turned to the right. So, my thesis is that she was doing that in the Croft photo too. So, she rode down the hill ignoring the crowd, not doing her job working the people on her side of the street; instead, she was turned and looking at him. Why? She said in her WC testimony that the first she knew something was wrong was when she turned and looked at Jack and saw that he had a quizzical look on his face. But wait: according to official lore, nothing was wrong until he was shot a fraction of a second before we see him at frame 225 in the Z film, panic-stricken and raising his hands to his throat, and no one would describe that as "quizzical." That's the word she used to describe his look: quizzical. 

Why don't we see any of this in the Zapruder film? Point to the part of the Zapruder film that corresponds to the span from Croft to Willis. You can't. It doesn't exist in the Zapruder film. They cut it out. 

At the top of the red span is when the Croft and Altgens photos were taken. Popular lore has it that Altgens was taken at Z255. Wrong. Terribly wrong. The Altgens photo was taken much earlier. But, that's for another day. At the bottom of the red span is when Kennedy got shot in the throat from the front. So, he rode down the steepest part of the hill reacting to being shot in the back and that alone. But, they couldn't show us that, not when they were trying to sell the idea of a single bullet. So, that entire area of the red span was cut out of the Zapruder film. And that's why the limo gets to the freeway sign so fast in the Zapruder film. He no sooner passes the TSBD and he's at the sign. It's because they took out so much. They wanted the story to be that he was smiling and waving; all was well, and then he passes behind the sign (which was like the magician's curtain) and then everything happened behind the sign, and when he emerges from behind the sign, he is a different man, physically and mentally.

It wasn't that way. He was already a different man before he reached the freeway sign. He was shot in the back long before that. 

Finally, for today: So, Kennedy was shot in the back high on the hill. The missile did not traverse him; in fact, it barely went into him. It stopped short; very short. But, how could a bullet do that? How could a bullet reach him at bullet speed, which was something like 2000 feet per second and then stop in an inch and a half? How could the bullet decelerate from 2000 feet per second to 0 feet per second over that infinitesimal distance? And if it was a bullet, what happened to it? That was no ordinary bullet. It was no bullet at all. It was a flechette made of ice that was pharmaceutically armed.