It's very unfortunate that very few people have recognized that JFK was stupefied in the Zapruder film. He couldn't speak. He couldn't think. He couldn't respond. He was mentally vacuous. He was like a zombie. What could have caused that? It wasn't physical trauma. All he incurred to that point was a shallow wound in his back that was inconsequential, and a shallow wound to his throat that did some damage to his tracheal rings on the left side, but he suffered no brain damage.

So, why was his mind gone? It's because the missile that hit him in the back delivered a nerve agent, and perhaps other drugs. He was inebriated. And he was also dysfuncitonal. His muscles were in spasm. He had no control over them. He couldn't put his arms down. They were frozen in spasm. Also, his hands were locked in flexion at the knuckle joints. He wasn't trying to do that. It was just happening to him. Poor Jackie tried to coax his arm down, but in vain. He was fucked up, but not from trauma; but rather, from poisoning. There is no other explanation for what we can see, including in this frame.

So, why didn't people recognize it? Well first, the medical profession didn't help. They copped out. Dr. John Lattimer made the ridiculous claim that Kennedy was exhibiting a Thorburn reaction, which he certainly was not. But, the bigger reason is that the JFK assassination was such a singular event, it's like it happened in its own world, that things that would never go unchallenged elsewhere, are accepted, such as Kennedy's bizarre behavior and bizarre presentation in the Zapruder film. Anything goes in JFK-land.

I am reminded of the ending of one my favorite movies, Chinatown. "It's Chinatown, Jake" which meant that anything can happen in Chinatown, including weird shit. And weird shit can happen in the JFK assassination and precisely and soley because it was the JFK assassination.

 Jack Ruby's defense lawyers were smart enough to stress the fact that Ruby had no memory of shooting Oswald. However, they were not smart enough to realize that the reason he couldn't remember it was because he didn't do it.

You have to subscribe to the NY Times to access this article, but I'm posting it anyway to show you that Ruby couldn't remember the shooting, and it was because he wasn't there for it. It didn't happen when he was there. There was no shot at all when he was there. He was there at a different time, an earlier time, at which he was jumped; hustled up to the 5th floor; and there told that he shot Oswald.

Ruby was stupid and incompetent. If he had half a brain he would have said, "check my gun; it hasn't been fired; smell the Goddamn muzzle; it doesn't stink." Of course, they took his gun from him. He never took it out. I'm sure they reached into his pocket and got it. But, unless they had an identical gun that was recently fired, he would have had them checkmated right there.

There was nothing wrong with Ruby's memory. He recalled seeing Lt. Rio Sam Pierce at the top of the ramp. So, if he remembered that, why wouldn't he remember shooting Oswald, if he had done it? But, you can't remember something that you didn't do.

Jack Ruby was innocent; completely, totally innocent; framed and innocent. If you don't know that about that JFK assassination weekend, you might as well not know anything at all.

Oswald and Ruby were both innocent. The perpetrators: Johnson, Hoover, Dulles, Bush, etc.- they were responsible for all the killings.

https://www.nytimes.com/1964/01/21/archives/defense-maintains-ruby-cant-remember-shooting.html?fbclid=IwAR2Ej9p8lt6vcc58anMTLmU1PktVjT2ELRb7dssmgHNCbDC8W_iB4k3h7yA

 Take what happened to Oswald and imagine that it happened today. Say that Jeffrey Epstein was being led somewhere by a couple cops, and somebody rushed in and shot him there at the Metropolitan Jail. And let's say that, as with Oswald, it was very clean, where you don't see any blood or gore, and let's say that, likewise, it was all over in less than a minute; a brief frenzy where you couldn't see a thing, and then when the space cleared, everyone was gone, Epstein, the shooter, and all the cops who were involved; they all vanished. Would you buy it?

You know, of course, what happened to Epstein, supposedly, was that he committed suicide. But, skepticism about it is rampant. The number of people who doubt that Epstein killed himself is so huge, it may be the biggest conspiracy belief of all.

The truth is that the killing of Oswald has no credibility at all. They all but explicitly announced in advance that it was going to happen. They went on the radio to declare how much they expected that someone was going to attack Oswald at that jail transfer. Then they march Oswald out with all the pomp and circumstance of a West Point graduation. Then, we see two men, Fritz and McMillan, nodding signals, so that everybody got their cue. Then, speaking of production cues, a horn honks right when the trio enters, and then it honks again just before the Shooter bolted in. Watch it yourself and you'll see that at 13:12, you hear the second honk, and then instantly, you see the Shooter bolt in. It was as tightly correlated as the gunshot that starts a 100 yard dash.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzAZ0o5_2yE&t=661s

I guess they didn't trust Bookhout. They must have told him to wait until he was cued by that second horn honk to make his move.

Then, you had Fritz stopping and shoving this cop out of the way because he knew he was going to need a lot of elbow room to act surprised. And then, right before Bookhout bolts in, you can distinctly see Jim Leavelle turn his head to his right, and that's because he did not want to see "Ruby" coming in. He wanted to be looking elsewhere.

Then the Shooter did a swan dive into the waiting arms of police. Oh yeah, that wascredible. We see that all the time. And then in the phony scuffle that followed, his hat and maybe even his wig fell off, and they had to quickly cover his head with something- and you can see them covering his head with something; it's not in doubt that that happened.

And then, somehow, they all knew that they were going to take him in through the corner door. No one got the idea to use the double doors, which were much more accessible. And no one got the idea to handcuff him in the garage. Isn't that strange? It seems like somebody would have been itching to get cuffs on him, right there and the.

Then, there was the Stampede. In the movie business, we refer to such performers as Extras.

In 2023, there are still people who think that dog and pony show was real? That's incredible. But, I know what to attribute it to. Two words come to mind: government schools. 

 

This is a comparison of the Phil Willis image of Carl Jones and the Altgens image. They are the same image. It is impossible for Willis and Altgens to capture him the same when Altgens was way down the length of Dealey Plaza on South Elm while Willis was right across the street from the entrance at the corner of Elm and Houston.

Notice, on the left, how big Carl was. He was very broad in the shoulders and chest. But, what is it on the right? There is his face in profile, then below it is the cuff of Oswald's shirt-sleeve, and then below that is this little configuration shaped like a shamrock. But, what happened to Carl Jones' body? His body isn't there. Recall the phenomenon of parallax. Carl Jones was out of view to Altgens due to parallax.

So, why did they do all this, insert the face of Carl Jones from the Phil Willis slide and put that shamrock shape in to represent his body? It was because Oswald was clasping his hands in front, which was his habitual stance, and they didn't want us to see it.

I was contacted by a man who was career Miliary, and he informed me that standing with your hands clasped in front is a common practice. Even though the "At Ease" stance usually involves clasping your hands in back, that's only mandatory when it's a formal parade. At other times, you can stand "At Ease" with your hands clasped in front. He thinks it was in the Marines that Oswald acquired the habit to stand that way.

But regardless, it was Oswald's entrenched habit, and we have many images of him doing it. They felt the need to remove it, hence, all the evil handiwork exploiting Carl Jones.

But, the larger question is: Why, when they saw that Oswald was standing in the doorway, didn't they just destroy the Altgens photo? Nobody would have missed it. The only one who knew about it was Ike Altgens hiimself, and he was a team player. If they told him that they had to destroy his photo "for national security reasons" he would have accepted it. It wasn't going to affect his pay. So, why would he care?

And let me tell you: If at the time, they could look into the future, and see that 60 years later, Ralph Cinque and others would be raising Holy Hell that Oswald is standing in the doorway, I guarantee you they would have destroyed it.

 In the center is a photo that was taken right before Oswald entered a lineup. And because he was going to be in a lineup, they removed his handcuffs. But, even though he's not wearing handcuffs, he is still clasping his hands in front, left over right. Why? Because that was his habit. He did it without even thinking.

And the Man in the Doorway is doing it too. Why? Because he was Oswald, and his habit manifested there the same way it did at the lineup. It is Oswald's shirt-cuff below the chin of the black man, Carl Jones. Carl was there, although not in the spot. He was out of view to Altgens due to the parallax of the angular photo. That image of him was taken by Congressman Phil Willis.

Why did they stick it in there? Because the Altgens photo showed Oswald clasping his hands in front, just as he did many times while in custody. The irony is that when posing for the FBI, Lovelady clasped his hands behind his back. So, that was his habit. Sticking the Willis Carl in there prevents you from seeing the hand-clasping.

But, even though the images of Altgens Doorman and Oswald before the lineup match very well, as to face, stance, look, and features, there is one feature that doesn't match at all: the top of the head. Doorman has an oval-shaped top of his head that was very simian, whereas the top of Oswald's head was more massive, and it was geometric rather than oval. They look very different. And that is what gave the plotters the confidence to claim that Doorman was Lovelady, as they inserted the top of the head of Young Lovelady into the photo.

And you can even see the junction of the two images, the line where they meet. I did not do this. Another researcher did it for me, and I am not going to reveal his name because I do not want him to be harassed. But, I will say that nobody has done better photographic work than him. He has given us the very best and clearest images we have of the Altgens doorway and other images.

On the left is how Doorman (Oswald) looked originally, and on the right is what he was transformed into. Obviously, it is a big difference. Why did they do it? Well, they were arrogant basards, but they wren't arrogant enough to just start claiming that Oswald was Lovelady without doing something to Loveladyify him. So, putting the crown of Young Lovelady over Oswald's crown was the main thing they did to muster up the confidence to assert that Doorman was Lovelady.

And they did more than that. The man on Oswald's left, our right, wasn't there. They put him in there just to hide the unique construction of Oswald's shirt, which was one he brought back with him from Russia. It was not an American shirt. And obviously, Billy Lovelady would not be wearing a Russian shirt, but Oswald would. The man fused to him is turned 90 degrees to the east, which means that he was looking at the east wall of the entrance. Why would he do that if the President was riding by? He wouldn't. He couldn't. He didn't. They just put him in there to obscure Oswald.

Then, the black man wasn't there either. There was a black man who was leaning against the column, below and west of Oswald. But, he could not have been where we see him in Altgens6. His name was Carl Jones, and the image of him in Altgens6 was taken from another photo that was taken about 3 PM by Congressman Phil Willis. Employees were going home, and Carl was descending the steps and looking east. I'll show you afterwards that the Altgens6 black man is a spot-on match to the same in Willis, and that's impossible because Altgens and Willis shot from very different angles.

Carl Jones was out of view to Altgens' camera. So, why did they put him in there? I believe it was because Oswald's shirt was hanging out, and it was tattered and torn, and it would have identified him.

And what I'm telling you about the black man in Altgens6 can't be doubted; it is certain. Just look at how paltry his image is. You see his face in profile. Then you see Oswald's sleeve, including his cuff. And then, you see this beige shamrock. That's supposed to be Carl's body. But, how could that be anybody's body? It's just more art; crappy art.

But, for the most part, the left image shows you what Doorman looked like prior to them tampering with it. The Man in the Doorway was Lee Harvey Oswald. I am not suggesting it. It is a fact. And it is an overwhelming fact.

 

Just look at how well matched these two are: the shape of the face, the identical clothes, and even the same stare. It is absurd and insane to claim that that's Oswald and Lovelady. For Goodness sake, they weren't twins, and this wasn't like an Elvis contest where everyone dressed the same. This much likeness in the man and the clothes means that it was him, Oswald, standing in the doorway.

Poor Billy Lovelady. He didn't want the role thrust upon him. He had a somewhat criminal past, but he just wanted to live a normal life. He did NOT want to claim to be Doorman because it involved lying, and he was no good at lying, and he knew he was no good at it. And CBS found that out the hard way. When they produced their 4 hour JFK Special in 1967, they planned to do a big segment on Lovelady as the Man in the Doorway. They paid him to come down from Colorado, where he had moved, and they took photos of him in the doorway. And they interviewed him extensively. But, before it aired, somebody at CBS with sense chucked the whole segment. Do you know how much they said about Lovelady and the Man in the Doorway? Not a word. And the reason why was: his credibility was completely lacking.

And the same thing happened 9 years later with the HSCA. They examined the issue, and since Oswald was dead, you'd think they would have subpoened Lovelady and had him testify. But, the top HSCA lawyer Ken Brooten traveled to Colorado to meet Lovelady, and his reaction was not to depose him or put him on the witness stand. Again, Lovelady lacked credibility. He just wasn't convincing. And Brooten quit his job with the HSCA so that he could represent Lovelady. Can you imagine? I have never heard of anything stranger than that. Before he left, he did make a recording of an informal questioning of Lovelady- with wife Patricia's help- trying to get him to walk the walk and talk the talk. But, Lovelady was a nervous wreck, and even with Pat's help with Brooten's softball approach, he was still a basket case. And it was never entered into the record.

I had the good fortune to speak, at length, several times to lawyer and journalist Jones Harris. And he told me something that is both sad and funny. He said that when he went to Dallas to interview Lovelady, they wouldn't let him into the TSBD, but they did send Lovelady out. It was May 1964, so a month after Lovelady testified to the WC, in which he refused to claim to be Doorman. But, I'm sure he was visited by big men in dark suits and sunglasses who made it clear to him that if he valued his life, as he knew it, he better get with the program.

So, Lovelady started claiming to be Doorman. And they didn't just wave the stick; they gave him the carrot too, and I mean so much money that he was able to start his own shipping company in Colorado. He was a guy who worked for $1.11/ hr at the TSBD.

But, Jones Harris hit him with a tough question: "Look, the FBI put it in writing that you said you wore a short-sleeved, vertically striped, red and white shirt, and they photographed you in it, unbuttroned. But then, the story became that you wore a long-sleeved plaid shirt. So, which shirt did you wear?"

Jones told me that Lovelady just froze and looked petrified. He didn't know how to answer. But, finally, he said, "Both."

You see what I mean? Lovelady just couldn't lie. He was no damn good at it. And he couldn't act either.

But behold: this is Oswald, in the doorway and a little later after he was arrested. Same man/ same clothes/ same stare. Even the same hand clasp, in front of his body, left over right. That is Oswald in the doorway as sure as it is Jesus on the Cross.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSrXXfBeAUk&t=983s

This is NBC coverage of the Jail Transfer featuring Tom Petit, and it is surreal. Repeatedly, he says how concerned the Dallas Police are that Oswald is going to be attacked. He said there were 3 normal routes to the County Jail, but the police weren't taking any of them.

How could there be 3 normal routes? The County Jail was on Main Street, and City Hall was too, although the formal address was on Harwood. I guess you could drive to Fairbanks AK and turn around and call that a route. So, I guess there were infinite routes.

But, what did they think could happen? Would the car get bombed? Would someone shoot at Oswald through the glass? But, he wouldn't just be sitting up in the car, would he?
Petit also said the cops were patrolling the ramp with riot guns. Well, where were they when Ruby waltzed in?

The whole thing is ridiculous. If they were that afraid, why do it at all? Why not move Oswald in the dead of night without saying a word? Why turn a 40 foot walk to a car into a pageant?

But, that Petit had a very drone, dead-pan voice, and it was exactly the same after the shooting as before. He said that Oswald was shot without the slightest rise of emotion. He sounded like a baseball announcer during a long dull stretch of the game. Even though they said ahead of time they feared it would happen, that wouldn't lessen your startle reaction when it did. The most excited he got was when he asked for some kind of backup. He said hurriedly, "Give it to me now. I want it." He got more worked up about that than Oswald getting shot.

They excluded the procession completely from this; it went immediately to the close-up of the shot. Why? Is it because Fritz and McMillan both nodded some signal on this 40 foot walk to a car? Or was it because Leavelle and Graves, aware of the grave danger that Oswald was in, didn't bother scanning the area, keeping their eyes moving; instead, they just looked straight ahead like a horse with blinders on? What's the point of being aware of a grave threat but not looking for it? Not visually scouring the theater of operation with your eyes? Do cops not know that when danger abounds, you have to keep your eyes moving and look? Why did Leavelle and Graves try so hard NOT to look?

I know why. It's because they didn't want to see Bookhout bolting in. They knew they didn't want to do anything until AFTER the shot was fired. They didn't want to interfere with it. God forbid.
However, you do see Bookhout make his swan dive into the waiting arms of police, and you also see the Stampede. However, they cut out most of the Penguins. So, it goes from the swan dive to the Stampede with little in-between.

One has to be awfully stupid not realize that this was staged.
And, let's be clear: If Dallas Police wanted to get Oswald to the County Jail intact, they certainly could have and would have. For them not to have accomplished such a simple thing means that they didn't want to accomplish it. It means that the whole thing was staged.

 

Oswald most certainly was the Man in the Doorway, and the people who deny it are either Statist trolls or they just don't know how to think. I've said before and it's true that you have to know how to prioritize evidence. And I mean prioritize it objectrively. You have to know what trumps what. And this case do you know what matters most? It is the images. They tell us who Doorman was. And just as rock beats scissors, the images beat the lip-flapping.

This is an excellent collage because the angles are so similar; they are practically identical. We see a perfect match of the eyes, nose, the same overall expression, the same pursed lips, the same ears, the exact same length and thickness of neck, the exact same shirt, and the exact same t-shirt. And that cinches it right there. Oswald and Lovelady did not look alike and they didn't dress alike. They were as different in size as Laurel and Hardy were, and I don't have to tell you who was who. To think there could have been this much likeness between Oswald and Lovelady is preposterous. Every human being is a genetic oddity except for identical twins. And the world of clothes is so big, that mathematically, there was virtually no chance that this much likeness in clothing occurred. The reason why the clothes look so similar is because they are the same clothes.

And remember: that when they made the decision to declare Oswald to be Lovelady, they weren't going to rely on just the assertion. They were arrogant as Hell, but they weren't that arrogant. They never would have had the confidence to do it unless they did something to transform Oswald into Lovelady- at least somewhat. So, they moved the top of Lovelady's head over to Oswald, using a picture of Lovelady from the 1950s, not realizing that he had lost quite a lot of hair. And they did more than that. They pasted in that guy who appears to be fused to Doorman. Who was he? He was nobody. Nobody has ever even tried to identify him. And they did other things, but moving the crown over was the biggest thing they did.

So, it's not necessary to match every single thing. That's not how it works. In other words, you can't override all the likenesses in his physicality and clothing, by saying that their hairlines don't match. With all those other likenesses, the hairlines don't matter. That's the way it works.

And this alone settles it, all by itself.: Oswald didn't shoot Kennedy because he was standing in the doorway at the time of the shots.

Don't believe the lies of the State and its minions. And I mean its minions in the media, its minions in education, and its minions in social media, such as here.

There is NOTHING that trumps this. Anything that anyone proffers is just noise. This cinches and clinches it. This is like the Cross was to Dracula. This is like water was to the Wicked Witch in The Wizard of Oz. You just have to remember that Oswald and Lovelady were two unrelated men, and there were no uniforms nor even a dress code at the TSBD. So, this much likeness between two unrelated men who were dressed randomly is impossible. This much likeness- and it is a hell of a lot of likeness- could only happen because they are the same man.