Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 There are two separate and distinct elements in pondering the Doorman question: the man and the clothing. You know that the world of men is big, with each man having his own, unique genetic identity. Every man's DNA is unique to him, except in the case of identical twins. 

The world of clothes is big too. And any one of the men could be wearing any set of the clothes. 

So, when you have both the man and the clothes matching, That's like winning the lottery twice. 

And that's what we have between Oswald and Doorman because they match and their clothes match.

Notice first the unbuttoned, long-sleeved shirt that is sprawled open. There was a reason for it, and that was that Oswald's buttons were missing. There were a couple at the bottom, but that's all. All the rest were missing. 

I have circled the right collars of Oswald and Doorman to show you that they are identical, where the triangular collar is lying flat, and beneath it is a little furl. Professor David Wrone, who is a member of my organization The Oswald Innocence Campaign noted that in his book. 

The other side of the shirt had the margin folded over, going all the way down, giving it the appearance of a jacket.  And that is what Officer Marrion Baker said it was: a jacket. He said that when he saw Oswald in the lunch room 75 seconds after the last shot that he was wearing a "light brown jacket." It was actually that shirt. 

So, on Oswald's right (our left) the margin of the shirt looks thin, but on the other side, it looks thick because it's folded over. And you can see the same thing on Doorman: thin on his right and thick on his left. 

And on his left, our right, you see the flat collar, a button loop beneath it, and then a long lapel. American shirts don't do that, and neither do shirts that are made for the American market. That was a Russian shirt that Oswald brought back with him. Oswald beat his enemies just in getting dressed that morning. He foiled them just by wearing that distinctive Russian shirt. And it's because of the distinctive look of that shirt that they put that freaky guy in the tie in there, who is overlapping Doorman in an impossible way. You could never duplicate that image, and I went to Dealey Plaza and proved it. But, it was to cover up the unique construction and arrangement of Oswald's shirt that they had to plop that other guy in there. Who was he? Nobody. Don't waste your time trying to identify him. 

But, it gets worse. Look at the bottom of Oswald's shirt. It wasn't just a Russian shirt; it was an old, tattered Russian shirt. You've heard of Raggedy Ann. Well, he was Raggedy Lee. And just imagine if that showed. And that's why they put the head of Carl Jones in beneath him. Carl was there, standing in the corner, but he was out of view to Altgens' camera due to parallax. So, they took a photo taken by Congressman Phil Willis about 3 pm when the employees were leaving, which included this image of Carl, and they transferred it to the Altgens photo to hide the tattered condition of Oswald's shirt, and also to hide the fact that he was clasping his hands in front of his body, as he often did. So, both guys crowding Oswald in the Altgens photo are fake. 

Look: it isn't close. It is clearly Oswald in the doorway, in Oswald's clothes, and doing Oswald's stance. There is too much likeness of the man and the clothing here for it not to be him. And I mean way too much likeness.