Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

  Have you heard Mary Moorman’s whole story of what happened? She did an extensive interview in 2013 which went on for hours. It used to be on Youtube, but I can no longer find it there.  But, I’ll tell you what she said.

She said that on the day, they took her photo and said they were going to make copes and also a negative, so that they could make unlimited copies. And it took a long time. She didn’t get out of the Sheriff’s Office until after dark.

But that night, they stormed her house at midnight saying that they needed the photo back. So, she gave it to them.

Then, some time later, they returned it to her. I don’t recall how long the interval was.

Then, over the following months, different federal agencies borrowed it from her again: the FBI, the Secret Service, and the CIA. Then, the FBI borrowed it from her a second time, and when they returned it after that time, it had the white thumbprint.

Now, why would they have to do that when they had copies and the negative? Obviously, there was something concerning about the photo. Her photo must have had something that was troubling, that was a problem.

So, what was that all about? All I can do is speculate, so I will.

I think her photo revealed something that was a threat to the official story. What she captured was the other side of the Stemmons Freeway sign, which they didn’t want us to see, which is why they put a much larger and more obtrusive freeway sign in the Zapruder film. I went to Dealey Plaza and proved experimentally that the freeway sign in the Zapruder film is fake. If you haven’t watched that video yet, here it is:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiJMrM_QKyc

I think they had two reasons for borrowing Mary’s photo repeatedly. It may be that each time, they were making subtle changes to it, trying to correct whatever it was that bothered them. They didn’t want to do a lot at once because that she would have noticed. But, the second reason was just to probe Mary; to get a sense of how respectful she was of Authority, and how willing she was to accept whatever Authority told her. And I’m sure they were extremely deferential and polite and respectful to her.  

Then, during the second FBI seizing, they went for an outright swap, replacing her photo with one taken by Babushka Lady, which happened later, after the fatal head shot. Or maybe it was right before the fatal head and they just said it was after. You realize that the Moorman photo is used to claim that there was no big blow-out in the back of his head.

There definitely was a big blow-out wound in the back of his head. Think about all those Parkland doctors and nurses who used their fist to demonstrate where it was located.

But, what about the white thumbprint? It was not an accident, and it is ridiculous to claim that it was. It was a perfectly dry Polaroid picture, and you can’t damage it by pressing your thumb into it, no matter how hard you press. I tried it myself with Polaroids that I have, such as this one of my nieces when they were young. It doesn’t phase it at all.

You know how they get your thumbprint by pressing it into black ink and then pressing it again onto special fingerprint paper. Well, they could have done the same thing using white ink. Or, they may have done it artistically, having someone paint it on.  But, one way or another, they added that thumbprint deliberately, and I think that every honest and intelligent person will admit that.

And as I stated before, the purpose of the thumbprint was to take Officer BJ Martin out of the photo, because from BL’s perspective, he got captured right next to Hargis, but from Mary’s perspective, he was not.

And the truth is: Mary’s story about what she did has changed over the years. Early on, she said she went into the street to take her photo, but in latter years, she retracted that. Early on, she demonstrated taking her picture turned to the right and photographing them before they reached her. But later, she began claiming that she took the picture right when they were even with her. And that doesn’t make sense because she would have photographed JFK the same way she photographed Officer Glenn McBride, which was absolutely perfect in its perspective, as you can see below. If she could do that for Glenn McBride, she could do it for JFK.

If you think about where Mary was, and what her intention was, which was to take a picture of JFK and Jackie capturing their faces, the “Moorman” photo makes no sense to be her photo. And I tell you, with absolute certainty, that it is not her photo.