Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 I have pointed out that the Zapruder film shows us that JFK was shot in the back high on the hill. Here is frame 206 in which JFK's face was smudged out, and Jackie is turned and looking at him. Neither of them is waving. Supposedly, nothing has happened yet, but both of them have checked out. 

And just the fact that they shortened the distance from the intersection to the freeway sign tells you that something was happening in that space that they wanted to bury. 

In the Zapruder film, Kennedy gets to the freeway sign too fast, and for two reasons: because they shortened the distance and because they sped up the limo. And it was all to hide the fact that he was shot in the back high on the hill.

And, there is corroborating evidence that JFK was shot in the back high on the hill: the 3 photos that were taken on Elm Street: Croft, Betzner, and Willis. We'll start with Croft. 

'

What should jump out at you first about this Croft photo is Jackie's dour expression. Supposedly, nothing has happened yet, so why isn't she smiling and waving? Also, her hair in the Croft photo is wrong. Look at her on the right. Her hair was styled in a bouncy flip. It wasn't glued down. Her face in the Croft photo was taken from a tv broadcast she did in mid-January to thank the American people for their cards and letters. They horizontally flipped her image. And remember what Croft said, that the FBI took his photo on 11/22 and didn't return it until the end of January. So, why did they replace her head in the Croft photo? It was because she must have been turned and looking at him, knowing that something was wrong. And they extended her hair and sealed shut his eye and covered his mouth, all to hide the startled look on his face- from being shot in the back. And he is not waving. And because his jacket was disrupted by the shot, they put a rectangular panel over it. The white arrow is pointing to it. Fools said that that was his jacket "bunching up." It was not. If you look closely at it, you can see that it's panel.

In Betzner, what jumps out at you is the big obstruction of the man on the left. 

  Are you aware that Betzner denied that any such man existed? And he was looking through the viewfinder, so he ought to know. Why was the man put there? It was probably to hide Jackie still turned to her husband and showing concern for him. She knew that there was something wrong. And again, neither of them are waving. 

And by the way, most of those people at the freeway sign weren't there. How do I know? Look at the Bronson photo, where it's just Umbrella Man and Dark Complected Man close to the sign. It's the exact same time.

So, right about dead center you see the sign. You're only seeing the pole because the sign is in profile to us. But, it's just Umbrella Man and Dark Complected Man there. 

Then, the Willis photo is said to be the last image before JFK was shot. It is a weird image because it hardly looks photographic. It looks more like art. JFK's image looks like art, like it was done with paint. The people under the sign look like crude art and unphotographic. But JFK isn't waving, and neither are the people closest to him. Even Umbrella Man looks unphotographic. That is extremely crude imagery.  

JFK was shot in the back high on the hill, but it could not have been a regular bullet. If it were a regular bullet that, say, stopped short in his back, then his ride down the hill would have been very different. He would have known that he was shot, and there would have been nothing wrong with his mind. So, he would have taken action. And he would have spoken, since there would have been no reason why he couldn't. He would have been the sharp, quick-witted, fast-thinking guy that he normally was. He wouldn't have just ridden down the hill without saying anything or doing anything. But, that's what he did. He rode down the hill without saying anything or doing anything. 

So, it couldn't have been a regular bullet that hit him. And the fact is, a regular bullet couldn't have stopped that short anyway, because that would violate the laws of physics. However, an ice dart could, and an ice dart did. It was a toxin-laden ice dart. That is not far-fetched. It is the only plausible explanation for everything we see: JFK's mental vacancy and complete mental collapse, his spreading spastic dystonia and dyskinesia, and his complete aphasia (inability to speak). A metal bullet in the back that only went in an inch and a half, damaging only skin, fascia, and muscle, couldn't do that. It had to be what I'm telling you.