Tuesday, August 5, 2025

This is from the Colorado Sun, an article about the two "iconic" photos from the Oswald shooting, Beers (left) and Jackson (right). It repeats the mantra that there was just 6/10 second between the two photos, with the shot going off in-between.

  



Let's consider whether it really was 6/10 seconds. If you look at them closely, the comparison is actually funny. For instance, the sliver of a guy holding a cigar in his left hand in Beers, along the right edge, is supposed to be the same guy who is smoking the cigar in Jackson. But, think about what that means. It means that he is seeing the shooter firing at Oswald, and in that 6/10 second, he brings the cigar to his mouth to take a pufff, and he also reaches for the gun with his right hand? What else could he be doing with his right hand? But, the funny part is him taking a drag from his cigar at a time like that, when it was clearly an emergency.  

And by the way, that cigar-smoking guy is supposed to be Detective Blackie Harrison. So, why does he look like Leonid Breznev? He certainly doesn't look like Blackie. 


Another weird thing is that in Beers, the Shooter's left leg is much longer than his right. You don't see all his left leg, but in your mind's eye, put in the rest of his leg and his foot. Now, compare that to the right leg and foot. Do you see what I mean that his left leg is both bigger and longer? And no, it's not because his left leg was closer to the camera because Beers was way back against the wall, standing on a ladder. 

Another weird thing is that in Beers, the Shooter's legs are spread wide apart. They are so wide apart, we can't even see his left foot. But, in Jackson, his legs are together, and they are beneath him, and he has no stretch going on. So, how could there be that much difference in 6/10 second? Also, the Shooter is in a different location. In Beers, he is to the side of Oswald, while in Jackson, he is in front of Oswald. So, could all that rearrangement take place in 6/10 second?

There are more discrepancies. I circled two men in Beers, Detective Tom McMillon and Reporter Ike Pappas. The reason I circled them is because we don't see them in Jackson. So, why aren't they there? Again: it's supposed to be just 6/10 second later.

So, how do I explain all this? I'll tell you. I've told you that these photos are not from the televised spectacle. They are from a photo-shoot was done prior to it. And it was right around that time that the real Jack Ruby arrived. And when he got there, they jumped him and dragged him up to the 5th flood. And the record shows that two of the officers involved in that were McMillon and Harrison. There is a detailed account of how it went. And both of them made excuses why they had to leave. They both said they had something pressing that they had to do. And I know what it was. It was to get back down to the basement to get in the picture. So, they were there for Beers, but they missed Jackson. 

I can't tell you why Pappas isn't in Jackson. But, in Beers, Pappas certainly proves that it was staged. And that's because the Shooter was a moving object. He darted right in front of Pappas to get to Oswald. And a person automatically looks at moving objects in their visual field. It's a reflex. So, Pappas should be looking at the Shooter, not at Oswald.  But, he is acting like he doesn't even see the Shooter. And why is McMillon looking down at the ground in Beers? And why in Jackson is Detective Lowery still clasping his hands in front when the shot has already gone off? Was he not the least bit startled by it? 

As for the leg length discrepancy in Beers, I think it had to do with Bookhout's short height. They were concerned, when they saw it, that Bookhout's short height was going to give it away that he wasn't Ruby, who was 5'9". So, I don't think Bookhout had all that stretch going on. I think they edited his left leg to give it that length to subliminally get people to think that he was a taller man. So, it was all about making him appear taller. 

Both those photos were staged. Posed and staged. Posed, staged, and edited. There is no doubt about it, and they have been lying to us about it for 62 years. And they're still lying because that article in Colorado Sun was published this year.  



Monday, August 4, 2025

 In case anyone has got any intention of harming me to silence me, I have been in touch with the JFK Oversight Committee in Washington, and I have informed them of them of the harassments I have had and the danger I am in. My lawyer knows too. 



Both these photos of Ruby were taken on the same day, 11/25/63, about 2 hours apart. On the left was on the way to the County Jail, and on the right was at the County Jail.  

Yet, he went from having corn rows to somebody taking a Sharpie to his head. Which is real? Neither! Ruby was practically bald on top. They had to give him hair because James Bookhout wore such a thick mop of a wig at the Garage Spectacle. 

I showed this discrepancy to Attorney Vince Salandria, and his reply was, "they didn't care." They didn't care how noticable it is. And that's because they knew the politicians were going to accept it; the Media was going to accept it; Academia was going to accept it; etc. Everybody was going to look out for #1 and accept it. 

But, it's over now. The jig is up. Ruby was innocent; framed and innocent. He was such a pathetically incompetent soul; like a sheep led to slaughter. 



 This is another collage of Ruby and the Shooter. The image of Ruby on the left is from Monday morning when they transferred him to the County Jail. He did not have hair like that: long, ropy strands, from front to back, over an otherwise bald head. And nobody does. They painted it on, and there is no doubt about it.

But, notice how stocky Bookhout was on the right. Perhaps pudgy is the better word. Look at the girth of his thigh, and compare it to both Oswald and Ruby, both of whom look like they have pencil legs, in comparison. It is very obvious that Ruby was not the Shooter.

What it means is the U.S. government killed Kennedy; then two days later, they killed Oswald. Attorney Vincent Salandria predicted it. He told everyone he knew that if Oswald dies, it means this was a coup.

The deniers are just shovelling sand to stop the tide.

Sunday, August 3, 2025

 David Allan Lawlor made the outrageous claim that seconds after Oswald was shot, reporers went up and talked to the Shooter in the garage, who was supposedly Jack Ruby. It is not true, and it wasn't even possible because immediately after the shot, the Shooter dove into the cluster of police, and they pounced on him. The idea was that they were dragging him into the Jail Office, but really, they were covering him up so that no one would see that he wasn't Ruby. I refer to those cops as the Penguins because they remind me of a male penguin colony packed together during severe cold snaps in Antartica.

No reporters claimed to recognize Ruby in the garage. All came to know he was "Ruby" from the Police announcing it afterwards. If you watch the entire KRLD footage, you'll see the reporters talking about it afterwards, wondering who the guy was. Then, they question Sergeant Patrick Dean about it, and he claims to know who it was but won't tell them. However, he gives them some clues, such as that it was a local Dallas businsesman. They ask him a series of questions, and some of them he answers, while others he responds to with "I'd rather not say."

You can watch it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsGPnpAUEN8&t=806s I am posting an image of the reporters talking to Sergeant Dean.

The eminent reporter Hugh Aynesworth knew Jack Ruby and ate lunch with him that week. He said that the Shooter zipped right in front of him but he did not recognizea him as Ruby. He said he only came to know he was Ruby from the Police announcing it.

The same is true for reporter Ike Pappas. He had had a conversation with Ruby the day before at which time Ruby gave him a business card for the Carousel Club, which Pappas still had. But, he too did not recognize Ruby in the garage.

Nobody except lying cops claimed to recognize Ruby in the garage. And the Dallas Police killed Oswald. The whole ruse was their scheme. They grabbed Ruby from the garage an hour before, which is when he got there. Ruby told the WC that he sent the money wire at 10:17, and that was the truth. Upstairs, Ruby was stripped to his underwear and kept up there until 3:00, at which time, they got him dressed in his own clothes again. Then, they took him down to the 3rd floor to talk to Fritz. And that is when he was slipped into the story for the first time. It was a classic bait and switch.

Now, as the years passed, some of the reporters started recollecting it as though they had recognized Ruby at the time. They would say things like "And then I saw Ruby rush in and shoot him." But, it was based entirely on their long-held belief that the Shooter was Ruby that came from the Police. AT THE TIME, NO REPORTER IN THE GARAGE SAID THE NAME RUBY PRIOR TO THE POLICE SAYING IT. It is a complete and total lie that any reporter claimed to recognize Ruby in the garage during the spectacle. No one did, and that is an absolute and undeniable fact.


Saturday, August 2, 2025

It's really very simple: Either these two match as the same man, or they don't. And if they don't, based on the images alone, then it's over. It means Ruby didn't do it. It doesn't matter what anybody said- including Ruby. This trumps everything. It is the alpha and the omega. It is the sum of all fears. Look closely and see if they are the same man, jettisoning all other thoughts from your mind. Do you have the discipline  to do it? Apparently, few do. But, this collage is speaking to you. And it is the destiny of JFK truth.  


 
 

Friday, August 1, 2025

 You should read this about the progressive nature of the seizures from nerve agents, where it becomes self-compounding. 

"This paper proposes a three phase "model" of the neuropharmacological processes responsible for the seizures and neuropathology produced by nerve agent intoxication. Initiation and early expression of the seizures are cholinergic phenomenon; anticholinergics readily terminate seizures at this stage and no neuropathology is evident. However, if not checked, a transition phase occurs during which the neuronal excitation of the seizure per se perturbs other neurotransmitter systems: excitatory amino acid (EAA) levels increase reinforcing the seizure activity; control with anticholinergics becomes less effective; mild neuropathology is occasionally observed. With prolonged epileptiform activity the seizure enters a predominantly non-cholinergic phase: it becomes refractory to some anticholinergics; benzodiazepines and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists remain effective as anticonvulsants, but require anticholinergic co-administration; mild neuropathology is evident in multiple brain regions. Excessive influx of calcium due to repeated seizure-induced depolarization and prolonged stimulation of NMDA receptors is proposed as the ultimate cause of neuropathology. The model and data indicate that rapid and aggressive management of seizures is essential to prevent neuropathology from nerve agent exposure."

In JFK, we see his condition worsening. Top left is 225, where nothing stands out as unusual. Then in 232, he's doing the bizarre winging of his arms, which is not the normal way to raise your hands. Then, in 253, his arms are stuck; they're frozen; he can't put them down. Jackie is trying to coax his arms down, and in 263, you can see that she has tilted him, but, his spasms have not let up. And you can see that he is getting tighter in his neck and shoulders. Then in 312, the last frame before the fatal head shot finished him, he is tighter yet and even more contracted. He is also completely internalized.


 And if he wasn't hit again after 312, the spasms may have spread to his respiratory muscles, preventing him from breathing and causing death by suffocation. It was certainly possible considering how it was progressing.  

JFK's psycho and neuro pathology has been staring us in the face. I don't know how people ignored it. All I can surmise is that they had the mindset that it was JFK-land, and weird stuff happened in JFK-land, like it was its own unique world.