Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This is from the Colorado Sun, an article about the two "iconic" photos from the Oswald shooting, Beers (left) and Jackson (right). It repeats the mantra that there was just 6/10 second between the two photos, with the shot going off in-between.

  

Let's consider whether it really was 6/10 seconds. If you look at them closely, the comparison is actually funny. For instance, the sliver of a guy holding a cigar in his left hand in Beers, along the right edge, is supposed to be the same guy who is smoking the cigar in Jackson. But, think about what that means. It means that he is seeing the shooter firing at Oswald, and in that 6/10 second, he brings the cigar to his mouth to take a pufff, and he also reaches for the gun with his right hand? What else could he be doing with his right hand? But, the funny part is him taking a drag from his cigar at a time like that, when it was clearly an emergency.  

And by the way, that cigar-smoking guy is supposed to be Detective Blackie Harrison. So, why does he look like Leonid Breznev? He certainly doesn't look like Blackie. 

Another weird thing is that in Beers, the Shooter's left leg is much longer than his right. You don't see all his left leg, but in your mind's eye, put in the rest of his leg and his foot. Now, compare that to the right leg and foot. Do you see what I mean that his left leg is both bigger and longer? And no, it's not because his left leg was closer to the camera because Beers was way back against the wall, standing on a ladder. 

Another weird thing is that in Beers, the Shooter's legs are spread wide apart. They are so wide apart, we can't even see his left foot. But, in Jackson, his legs are together, and they are beneath him, and he has no stretch going on. So, how could there be that much difference in 6/10 second? Also, the Shooter is in a different location. In Beers, he is to the side of Oswald, while in Jackson, he is in front of Oswald. So, could all that rearrangement take place in 6/10 second?

There are more discrepancies. I circled two men in Beers, Detective Tom McMillon and Reporter Ike Pappas. The reason I circled them is because we don't see them in Jackson. So, why aren't they there? Again: it's supposed to be just 6/10 second later.

So, how do I explain all this? I'll tell you. I've told you that these photos are not from the televised spectacle. They are from a photo-shoot was done prior to it. And it was right around that time that the real Jack Ruby arrived. And when he got there, they jumped him and dragged him up to the 5th flood. And the record shows that two of the officers involved in that were McMillon and Harrison. There is a detailed account of how it went. And both of them made excuses why they had to leave. They both said they had something pressing that they had to do. And I know what it was. It was to get back down to the basement to get in the picture. So, they were there for Beers, but they missed Jackson. 

I can't tell you why Pappas isn't in Jackson. But, in Beers, Pappas certainly proves that it was staged. And that's because the Shooter was a moving object. He darted right in front of Pappas to get to Oswald. And a person automatically looks at moving objects in their visual field. It's a reflex. So, Pappas should be looking at the Shooter, not at Oswald.  But, he is acting like he doesn't even see the Shooter. And why is McMillon looking down at the ground in Beers? And why in Jackson is Detective Lowery still clasping his hands in front when the shot has already gone off? Was he not the least bit startled by it? 

As for the leg length discrepancy in Beers, I think it had to do with Bookhout's short height. They were concerned, when they saw it, that Bookhout's short height was going to give it away that he wasn't Ruby, who was 5'9". So, I don't think Bookhout had all that stretch going on. I think they edited his left leg to give it that length to subliminally get people to think that he was a taller man. So, it was all about making him appear taller. 

Both those photos were staged. Posed and staged. Posed, staged, and edited. There is no doubt about it, and they have been lying to us about it for 62 years. And they're still lying because that article in Colorado Sun was published this year.