For a long time, I have been pointing out that it is only natural that Oswald defenders and Oswald accusers be bitter enemies. So, when there is any fraternizing or back-patting between the two, I find it very disturbing and inexcusable.
Anyway, here is the letter I received ostensibly from Seamus Coogan. I realize there is a lot of phony emailing going on in the JFK world. Look at all the phony emails attributed to me. But in this case, it seems to be from Coogan, although he can deny it if he wants to.
* * * * * * * *
I actually have no idea who Bpete is I have never met him. I couldn't give a toss about his belief in Oswald either. Though he maybe incorrect in that instance. He is wholly correct in taking on your crackers organisation. Jim and I are considering actions against the "Oswald Insanity Group" you represent for a number of libelous claims. So keep on saying I am an associate of Bpete, I need the money. One of the most bizarre allegations is I live in the UK. I live in NZ, Figure out what the NZ initials mean and I will award you a big shiny star in your homework book.
Jim's belief in Oswald on the stair is not the OIP groups version of reality. Moreover, like me Jim is pretty coy on being 100 percent. Sadly, if Oswald really is on the stair you guys shat over any credibility the argument ever had. Jim would agree with me.
I wish you a happy new year sincerely. Moreover, I really do hope and pray that the issues pertaining to your lack of IQ (hell more initials for you to sort out) and obvious blunt force trauma you sustained as a child are resolved. I am sure when CTKA see you in court you can use this in your defense of Diminished Capacity!
* * * * * * * *
Coogan, I admit I got it wrong about you living in the UK, but since it isn't a crime to live in the UK, and there is no moral turpitude involved in living in the UK, I don't see what there is to sue about. In any case, I acknowledge that you live in New Zealand. Happy?
And I never said you were an "associate" of bpete. I never used that word. You said in your interview with Rob Clark that you were a "fan of his work," and that's what I pointed out. But, bpete advocates that Oswald "locked and loaded" on the 6th floor, so what is there to be a fan about if you claim Oswald was innocent?
That is the term bpete used: lock and load. He said it goes back to his military days with his M16 rifle.
And for your information, there was no "stair" involved; there were steps. And Oswald wasn't even on the steps; he was on the landing; on the very top. He was right outside the door on the top landing.
And you're right that Jim D's version of Oswald being outside is not the same as ours; he backs another horse. But, there isn't one physical feature of that man or his clothing that is a match to Oswald. There is complete utter total disparity and divergence between the two. It is insane to say that "A" is "Z", and that is what is involved in claiming that Prayer Man was Oswald.
But, between Oswald and Doorman there is a convergence of features of both the man and the clothing which the rationally-minded find compelling. The attached collage pretty much says it all. Who matches Oswald better, Doorman or Prayer Man? Go by what your eyes tell you and nothing else.
And, by publishing your letter, I mean to make you famous, Seamus. I want the world to see how you write, although I can't say it speaks well for the New Zealand school system. Uh-oh. Was that libelous? Well, I'm pretty sure that when I receive an email letter that it becomes my property, and I can do whatever I want with it. And let the record show that I haven't changed a single word in your letter, Coogan. It's all you.
But, it occurs to me that being a "researcher" would seem to imply at least a minimal ability to write coherently in the English language- if you are from New Zealand. But hey, that's just me. But, let the record show that I am not accusing Seamus Coogan of being a researcher. Ralph Cinque
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.