 |
On Saturday, July 4, 2015 at 2:47:13 PM UTC-4, Ralph Cinque wrote:
> http://oswaldinthedoorway.
Ralph. You are not using your head, nor have you done your research. Mary> http://oswaldinthedoorway.
Moorman stated on national TV that when she snapped the picture that
"That's the only chance I had. Mine is a Polaroid and I can only take a
picture every 10 seconds". Either she was counting down 10 seconds as she
is tracking the limousine in her viewfinder and when she reached 10 she
snapped the picture, or, since Mrs. Kennedy was blocking her view of the
president, she waited until he also would show up in the photograph. If
you are aiming to turn this into something sinister, forget it.
Ralph Cinque:
I'm not turning it sinister for Mary Moorman; she's a victim.
But that is not her photo. I have communicated with Mary, and she has responded to me. She told me, as she has told others, and as she said from the very beginning, that she snapped her picture simultaneous with the first shot, and then she heard two more shots.
Well, the Moorman photo was definitely taken after the final shot. There were no shots following it. So, if Mary took her photo and then heard shots, she could not have taken the Moorman photo. Here are Mary's words to me:
“At the very instant I heard the first shot, I was snapping the photo. One (shot) with the camera to my face, then 2 more, bam, bam.”
It means that she could not have taken the Moorman photo.
Look, I know that you respect Vincent Bugliosi. Well, Bugliosi used the Moorman Photo as proof that all the Parkland doctors and nurses were full of it for saying that JFK had a big blow-out wound in the back of his head. Remember all the demonstrations from them? Here, I'll jog your memory.
So, if the Moorman photo was taken after the fatal head shot, then Mary Moorman could not have taken it because she heard shots after she took her picture.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.